Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Sun. 5 @ Lions 12:00 PM
Sun. 12 PATRIOTS 12:00 PM
Mon. 20 @ Vikings 7:30 PM
Sun. 26 JETS 12:00 PM
Sun. 2 @ Packers 12:00 PM

Dayum, that looks tougher than ours.



I agree with Porky on seemingly every one of his posts that I happen to read. With this particular post, I feel that he offers a great deal of levity to a conversation offers some much needed insight and calm wisdom. His words here will no doubt calm the general attitude held by the consensus of PackersHome's illustrious group of contributors (and non-contributors like that dickwad peteralan71 who choose to only post something as witless as +1). For his contributions I am awarding Porky88 with a plus one to his applause count and I'm mentioning it here because I'd like him to know that I appreciate what he's contributed, and am hoping that he continues to contribute such wisdom and general football knowledge to our discussions for years to come.

Well, shit, I guess I can't do that.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



::roll:


Regarding porky88, he is a great poster with great comments matched by very few on this site, that is definite. He knows his stuff.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
  • Greg C.
  • 50.25% (Neutral)
  • Registered
14 years ago

Sun. 5 @ Lions 12:00 PM
Sun. 12 PATRIOTS 12:00 PM
Mon. 20 @ Vikings 7:30 PM
Sun. 26 JETS 12:00 PM
Sun. 2 @ Packers 12:00 PM

Dayum, that looks tougher than ours.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Three divisional road games, and home games against arguably the two best teams in the league. It will be tough for the Bears, although like us, their "easiest" remaining game is the one next week.
blank
peteralan71
14 years ago

+1

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



That's all you can fucking say? Really fucking awesome contribution.


I wanted three FUCKING's so this is where the third has to be. :)

"peteralan71" wrote:



I believe the +1 portrays my mirroring of porky88's points. Also, the discussion that you and I had in Fan Shout last night mirrored it. I doubt you have forgotten that. It should be obvious that my +1 was sufficient in saying that I agree with everything he said.
Fucking.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
dhpackr
  • dhpackr
  • 60% (Friendly)
  • Registered
14 years ago
tru dat
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
peteralan71
14 years ago
I've seen it about 10 times now, and I get repeatedly upset when watching the Gonzales TD where Collins just watches him cut in and catch the ball. Completely blown coverage and no attempt to rectify it. Reminds me of last year against the Vikings when Al Harris had a blown coverage that resulted in a TD, and was throwing his arms up while the ball was still in the air. Giving up on plays cannot happen.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
14 years ago
All I learned yesterday is that Atlanta has no vertical game. I was amazed halftime adjustments were not made to take away the underneath. Their offensive line is too good to blitz so you make them throw short and do a better job tackling next time.

Our offense screwed the pooch again in the red zone. I have a real problem with play selection down there. Also Brandon Jackson should be 3rd down back only. Play the kid we stole from Atlanta's practice squad. If Clifton and Colledge could ever run block we couldn't be stopped.

We have now lost 4 games by 12 points total, 3 of which we got screwed by refs and this last one, we stepped on our own dicks. I feel good about our chances with our without Finley and Grant.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Dakota - I'd feel better with Finley as twice we were stopped at 4th and 1 and once we fumbled on their 1 yard line. Finley would be da bomb for 1 yard completions. I think if we're missing anyone, it's him.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
peteralan71
14 years ago

Dakota - I'd feel better with Finley as twice we were stopped at 4th and 1 and once we fumbled on their 1 yard line. Finley would be da bomb for 1 yard completions. I think if we're missing anyone, it's him.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Finley was clutch in any 3rd down situation. We definitely miss him for the conversions. Some argue that it was a good thing when he went down because it forced Rodgers to look at all the receivers, and I agreed, but all in all we would be better with him in the lineup, without a doubt.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
14 years ago

Dakota - I'd feel better with Finley as twice we were stopped at 4th and 1 and once we fumbled on their 1 yard line. Finley would be da bomb for 1 yard completions. I think if we're missing anyone, it's him.

"peteralan71" wrote:



Finley was clutch in any 3rd down situation. We definitely miss him for the conversions. Some argue that it was a good thing when he went down because it forced Rodgers to look at all the receivers, and I agreed, but all in all we would be better with him in the lineup, without a doubt.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



We suck at third and short because McCarthey insists on smash mouth but we have 2 lineman with TNS (tiny nut syndrome). Just throw the damn ball.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago
+1 to Dakota.

The more we throw, the more points we score. The more we run, the more we punt.

Points > punting.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Greg C.
  • Greg C.
  • 50.25% (Neutral)
  • Registered
14 years ago
[quote="DakotaT"]Our offense screwed the pooch again in the red zone./quote]

I don't understand the "again" part. The Packers have done very well in the red zone this season. Even in this game, the fumble was the only problem. In their other three red zone appearances, they got two TDs and a field goal.

Let's not turn a failure on one drive into a chronic shortcoming.
blank
peteralan71
14 years ago

[quote="DakotaT"]Our offense screwed the pooch again in the red zone./quote]

I don't understand the "again" part. The Packers have done very well in the red zone this season. Even in this game, the fumble was the only problem. In their other three red zone appearances, they got two TDs and a field goal.

Let's not turn a failure on one drive into a chronic shortcoming.

"Greg C." wrote:



I wouldn't consider a FG a successful outcome when the team makes it down to the red zone, though. It is just the same as punting, the field position is the only difference. Obviously a FG is better than punting, but I still say that a FG is not exactly a success.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
LambeauEast
14 years ago
My thoughts...if Brickhands Johnson catches that one pass on the goal line, Rodgers never gets the chance to fumble, which turns into an eventual Falcon TD. 7 point swing right there, game!

Shoulda, woulda coulda though...oh well.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
  • Greg C.
  • 50.25% (Neutral)
  • Registered
14 years ago

[quote="DakotaT"]Our offense screwed the pooch again in the red zone./quote]

I don't understand the "again" part. The Packers have done very well in the red zone this season. Even in this game, the fumble was the only problem. In their other three red zone appearances, they got two TDs and a field goal.

Let's not turn a failure on one drive into a chronic shortcoming.

"peteralan71" wrote:



I wouldn't consider a FG a successful outcome when the team makes it down to the red zone, though. It is just the same as punting, the field position is the only difference. Obviously a FG is better than punting, but I still say that a FG is not exactly a success.

"Greg C." wrote:



So two TDs and a field goal is not good enough. Apparently they must score a TD every single time they are in the red zone. High standards.
blank
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
14 years ago

My thoughts...if Brickhands Johnson catches that one pass on the goal line, Rodgers never gets the chance to fumble, which turns into an eventual Falcon TD. 7 point swing right there, game!

Shoulda, woulda coulda though...oh well.

"LambeauEast" wrote:



Worst part.. the pass wasn't intended for him.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Greg C.
  • Greg C.
  • 50.25% (Neutral)
  • Registered
14 years ago

My thoughts...if Brickhands Johnson catches that one pass on the goal line, Rodgers never gets the chance to fumble, which turns into an eventual Falcon TD. 7 point swing right there, game!

Shoulda, woulda coulda though...oh well.

"pack93z" wrote:



Worst part.. the pass wasn't intended for him.

"LambeauEast" wrote:



Which is why it was nearly impossible to catch. Brick hands, my ass. If he's guilty of anything, he may have run the wrong route. Or maybe the other guy did. Or maybe Rodgers underthrew it.
blank
peteralan71
14 years ago

[quote="DakotaT"]Our offense screwed the pooch again in the red zone./quote]

I don't understand the "again" part. The Packers have done very well in the red zone this season. Even in this game, the fumble was the only problem. In their other three red zone appearances, they got two TDs and a field goal.

Let's not turn a failure on one drive into a chronic shortcoming.

"Greg C." wrote:



I wouldn't consider a FG a successful outcome when the team makes it down to the red zone, though. It is just the same as punting, the field position is the only difference. Obviously a FG is better than punting, but I still say that a FG is not exactly a success.

"peteralan71" wrote:



So two TDs and a field goal is not good enough. Apparently they must score a TD every single time they are in the red zone. High standards.

"Greg C." wrote:



Not at all. I'm just saying that coming out with a FG is good, but obviously we would much rather have a touchdown. If we force a turnover in the opposing team's 1-35 yard line, putting us in FG range immediately, we could do nothing and kick a FG on 4th and 10. Do you consider that series a success? Kind of, but in a tongue in cheek sort of way. Does Aaron Rodgers and his supporting 10 consider a FG a success, or are they upset that they didn't come away with 6? The field position is the only thing that changes how you feel about it, which in this case had nothing to do with the offense. I just don't like going to 4th down. Ever.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
A field goal at the end of a long drive is a success in a tongue-in-cheek way? Can you explain what you mean by this? I'm confused how considering a field goal to be a success is a humorous assessment.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Senior Member
14 years ago
Considering we lost all four freaking games by a FG and would have won the Redskins game with one at the end I'll take whatever points we can put up.

IMO I think it is wise to take the points whenever your on the road playing a good team. Especially in games where it's pretty obvious neither team is going to go up and down the field scoring a ton of points.

Now in certain games like possibly NE coming up when the scoreboard is more than likely going to get lit up and the team your playing isn't that stout on defense I say you go for it there.

On the other hand when we play teams like NY or the Bears I say put the 3 points on the board every time.
"The train is leaving the station."
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    beast (5h) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
    Zero2Cool (10h) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
    Zero2Cool (10h) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
    Zero2Cool (10h) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
    Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
    dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
    Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
    Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
    packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
    Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
    Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
    Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
    Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
    dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
    Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
    dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
    Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
    Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
    Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
    Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
    Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
    Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
    dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
    dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
    wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
    Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
    Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
    Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
    Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
    beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
    Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
    Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
    Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

    1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.