Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

Missed Parent-Teachers Conferences Could Result in Jail Time for Parents
 
by Honey Berk
Oct 22nd 2010 1:12PM

There have been plenty of reports about parents being jailed when their kids miss school, but now parents also may be locked up for their own absences -- from parent-teacher conferences.

Michigan prosecutor Kim Worthy is pushing for a new law that would require parents to attend at least one conference per year or face three days of jail time, the Detroit News reports.

Though she has started presenting her plan at the city level, Worthy staffers tell the News she is trying for a statewide mandate. Either way, the proposed law would be the first of its kind in the country.

In responding to an accusation by "Good Morning America" anchor George Stephanopoulos that her plan sounds like "the nanny state on steroids," Worthy cites the fact that the government already regulates many issues involving children and their well-being.

"A lot of people say that we shouldn't legislate morality, but we already do," Worthy tells "Good Morning America." "We legislate for children specifically that they have to be in car seats. We legislate that parents have to send their children to school if they're 6 to 15 years old. And, here in Michigan, you can go to jail for up to 30 days ... if you don't send your children to school ... So, we legislate all kinds of things already when it comes to children."

The proposed law is but one facet of a comprehensive package her office has put together, and one that is strictly targeted to repeat offenders, Worthy tells "Good Morning America."

"It's not like you miss one and you go jail -- that's not it at all," she says. "You schedule it; you have up to three opportunities to schedule your conferences at your convenience -- night, afternoons and midnight for parents who work."

In addition, there are some exemptions to the plan: parents of children who are doing well in school, those who have health issues that render them unable to travel to school and those who are "actively engaged" with their child's teachers through e-mail, phone calls or letters, the News reports. There is also a plan for intervention services that would kick in before the mandate for jail time.

"We have to find any means necessary to get parents involved," Worthy told the Detroit City Council, the News reports. "We have to start talking about prevention ... Some children don't have a chance the day they are born."

Wayne County Commissioner Laura Cox tells the News she thinks Worthy's intentions are admirable, but that the prospect of jailing parents is "inappropriate on a lot of levels."

Kevin McNamara, another colleague, tells the newspaper he fears the law would become a "tattletale version of pin the tail on the bad parent."

And one Livonia Public Schools board member tells the News: "You can't legislate parental involvement. If the law forces parents to go, what will it do other than fill up a room with parents who don't want to be there?"

But Worthy counters these arguments by drawing a link between parental involvement and youth crime.

"... We're seeing students as young as 10, 11, 12, 13 committing the most violent crimes, and guess what we find out?" she tells "Good Morning America." "They're not in school, they don't have parental supervision and that parent has not been up to that school. And so, again, this is but one in a series of things that we want to try introduce that will go right to parental responsibilities. And, ultimately, if our children are in school and doing well, they are not out doing crimes."


UserPostedImage
Formo
13 years ago
STUPID.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
4PackGirl
13 years ago
don't know what the answer is to this but i'm pretty sure it's not jailing the so-called parents. if they cared about their kids, they'd have them in school. how about taking the kids away from the 'parents' thusly reducing the amount of welfare benefits they receive? i dunno.
Porforis
13 years ago
That's it, I'm moving to France. Just kidding.
longtimefan
13 years ago

don't know what the answer is to this but i'm pretty sure it's not jailing the so-called parents. if they cared about their kids, they'd have them in school. how about taking the kids away from the 'parents' thusly reducing the amount of welfare benefits they receive? i dunno.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



So all the parents that dont show up are on welfare? I think you know the answer to that...

Hope no one losses focus of the point of all this...

Get the parents involved..

exemptions to the plan:

parents of children who are doing well in school, those who have health issues that render them unable to travel to school and those who are "actively engaged" with their child's teachers through e-mail, phone calls or letters



I AGREE sending parents to jail is stupid..Your going to take them away from the kids, which in turn leads to NO involvment at all, the very thing your trying to put an end to..

There has to be a different way to get them involved..

I know myself growing up in the early 70's my mom was at EVERY conference as were most of my friends moms and for most part we all did good in school..and stayed out of trouble..

I do recall one of my friends that didnt have the mom or dad show, ended up into drugs, alcohol, and skipping school in the 8th and 9th grade..After 9th grade he was gone..Dont even know where he went..

Now not saying it was all because his mom never showed, but it is odd that she didnt show and he was in trouble a lot..
Pack93z
13 years ago
I don't know what is more pathetic in this situation.

The fact that they are trying to pass such a law or the fact that the need is so apparent that they feel the need for such a law.

Most can have a child, but not everyone is fit to be a parent.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
4PackGirl
13 years ago

don't know what the answer is to this but i'm pretty sure it's not jailing the so-called parents. if they cared about their kids, they'd have them in school. how about taking the kids away from the 'parents' thusly reducing the amount of welfare benefits they receive? i dunno.

"longtimefan" wrote:



So all the parents that dont show up are on welfare? I think you know the answer to that...

Hope no one losses focus of the point of all this...

Get the parents involved..

exemptions to the plan:

parents of children who are doing well in school, those who have health issues that render them unable to travel to school and those who are "actively engaged" with their child's teachers through e-mail, phone calls or letters

"4PackGirl" wrote:



I AGREE sending parents to jail is stupid..Your going to take them away from the kids, which in turn leads to NO involvment at all, the very thing your trying to put an end to..

There has to be a different way to get them involved..

I know myself growing up in the early 70's my mom was at EVERY conference as were most of my friends moms and for most part we all did good in school..and stayed out of trouble..

I do recall one of my friends that didnt have the mom or dad show, ended up into drugs, alcohol, and skipping school in the 8th and 9th grade..After 9th grade he was gone..Dont even know where he went..

Now not saying it was all because his mom never showed, but it is odd that she didnt show and he was in trouble a lot..



i put the whole welfare thing in there just to see the reaction. bad julie. but honestly, take something from the parents that is of value besides their freedom. money came to mind the quickest.
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
It amazes me that Americans actually think attendance at parent-teacher conferences should be mandatory by law -- and that failure to attend should be subject to penalty.
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
13 years ago
glad to hear it rourke. as long as we disagree on a subject, i'm happy. 😃
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
That made me grin. +1 😃
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (11h) : @DavidBearmanPFN · 18h Vegas has watched Will Levis for 3 weeks and installed them as a 1-point favorite in Miami next week. Let that sink
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Martha, they did play much better with Dalton yesterday
Zero2Cool (13h) : Test results on Sam Darnold’s knee showed a knee bruise and no structural damage. He is not expected to miss any time.
Martha Careful (16h) : Not with Dalton apparently
Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : Not sure what to make of the NFC South so far this season (outside of the Panthers being a dumpster fire)
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : of course I say that and then they overturn that play that put them on the 49ers 2 yard line
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : *without
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : Even with Nacua and Kupp out, Rams looking fiesty on offense
Martha Careful (22-Sep) : Tim Boyle is playing for the Dolphins
Martha Careful (22-Sep) : I love seeing Dallas lose
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : The Red Rifle is on fire in Las Vegas! 3 TDs in the first half!
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : @mattschneidman · 2m The fire alarm is going off inside the Packers locker room here in Nashville.
Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : Gonna need a drink after looking at my picks for the early games in Pick'em
Zero2Cool (22-Sep) : James Jones. Y’all must not know, Dr. Mackenzie🤣 he was not going to let Jordan love play today.
Zero2Cool (22-Sep) : Malik to start. Love inactive. Per report. Let's go!!
buckeyepackfan (22-Sep) : I think J-10VE will be inactive, a little twist that could be put in is run a wildcat with Wicks at qb. Have him as emergency qb if needed.
Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : I think that's how it works.
Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : I'd go 3 QB regardless this game.
Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : Clifford was elevated, not activated. He doesn't play, it doesn't count.
hardrocker950 (21-Sep) : If Clifford is active, not likely to see Jordan play this weekend
Mucky Tundra (21-Sep) : QB Sean Clifford and CB Robert Rochell elevated from the PS for the Titans game
Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : Love questionable. Morgan is out. Valentine is doubtful
Martha Careful (20-Sep) : Rodgers and Lazard off to a very strong start
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Josh Jacobs. Limited.
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Can't find anything on Jacobs :(
wpr (19-Sep) : Do you know if they gave Jacobs an extra day off? I hope so.
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : WR Jayden Reed (calf) and G Elgton Jenkins (illness/glute) returned after sitting out Wednesday.
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Packers are in pads and so is Jordan Love. Second straight day of practice for QB1.
bboystyle (18-Sep) : If Love comes back, we win in a blow out
Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Jordan Love just spoke with reporters and said he’s giving himself the week but hopeful to play Sunday against the Titans.
Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Practicing is Jordan Love!
Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Packers are signing WR Cornelius Johnson to the Practice Squad per sources. Johnson was a 7th round pick this year.
Zero2Cool (17-Sep) : Packers placed RB MarShawn Lloyd on injured reserve.
Zero2Cool (16-Sep) : Rams won’t have Cooper Kupp or Puka Nacua when they host the Packers in Week 5.
Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : Or is that the Rusty Red Rifle because of his age?
Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : The Red Rifle Returns!
Zero2Cool (16-Sep) : Panthers are benching former No. 1 overall pick Bryce Young and starting veteran Andy Dalton beginning this week.
Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : bears still have slim chance here
Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : and there's another one!
Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : oh crap macbob has the Texans K and he keeps hitting these long FGs
Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : Hope the Texans beat the brakes off the Bears
Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : LaFleur: “I asked Malik why he didn’t throw it on that third down and he told me Josh threw up on the ball.”
Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : i was wondering why it was just you, me, beast and macbob by the end
Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : Yeah it was weird today for some reason
Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : Oh my, marvin harrison jr might be as good as he was billed out to be
Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : and none of the chats on my phone are showing up on the desktop chat
Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : weird, i was on my phone for chat during the game but now on my desktop I look at chat and there's tons of chats i didn't see on my phone
Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : Oh yeah, for sure. That's just not fair thoguh.
Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : Zero, what I meant was that surely a tech and IT genius such as yourself would find a way to change the pick
Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : Well, I mean, I know I did, but might not have waited for it to register and went into Chat. Oh well
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
7h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

21-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

18-Sep / Random Babble / wpr

18-Sep / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

18-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

18-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.