Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

Missed Parent-Teachers Conferences Could Result in Jail Time for Parents
 
by Honey Berk
Oct 22nd 2010 1:12PM

There have been plenty of reports about parents being jailed when their kids miss school, but now parents also may be locked up for their own absences -- from parent-teacher conferences.

Michigan prosecutor Kim Worthy is pushing for a new law that would require parents to attend at least one conference per year or face three days of jail time, the Detroit News reports.

Though she has started presenting her plan at the city level, Worthy staffers tell the News she is trying for a statewide mandate. Either way, the proposed law would be the first of its kind in the country.

In responding to an accusation by "Good Morning America" anchor George Stephanopoulos that her plan sounds like "the nanny state on steroids," Worthy cites the fact that the government already regulates many issues involving children and their well-being.

"A lot of people say that we shouldn't legislate morality, but we already do," Worthy tells "Good Morning America." "We legislate for children specifically that they have to be in car seats. We legislate that parents have to send their children to school if they're 6 to 15 years old. And, here in Michigan, you can go to jail for up to 30 days ... if you don't send your children to school ... So, we legislate all kinds of things already when it comes to children."

The proposed law is but one facet of a comprehensive package her office has put together, and one that is strictly targeted to repeat offenders, Worthy tells "Good Morning America."

"It's not like you miss one and you go jail -- that's not it at all," she says. "You schedule it; you have up to three opportunities to schedule your conferences at your convenience -- night, afternoons and midnight for parents who work."

In addition, there are some exemptions to the plan: parents of children who are doing well in school, those who have health issues that render them unable to travel to school and those who are "actively engaged" with their child's teachers through e-mail, phone calls or letters, the News reports. There is also a plan for intervention services that would kick in before the mandate for jail time.

"We have to find any means necessary to get parents involved," Worthy told the Detroit City Council, the News reports. "We have to start talking about prevention ... Some children don't have a chance the day they are born."

Wayne County Commissioner Laura Cox tells the News she thinks Worthy's intentions are admirable, but that the prospect of jailing parents is "inappropriate on a lot of levels."

Kevin McNamara, another colleague, tells the newspaper he fears the law would become a "tattletale version of pin the tail on the bad parent."

And one Livonia Public Schools board member tells the News: "You can't legislate parental involvement. If the law forces parents to go, what will it do other than fill up a room with parents who don't want to be there?"

But Worthy counters these arguments by drawing a link between parental involvement and youth crime.

"... We're seeing students as young as 10, 11, 12, 13 committing the most violent crimes, and guess what we find out?" she tells "Good Morning America." "They're not in school, they don't have parental supervision and that parent has not been up to that school. And so, again, this is but one in a series of things that we want to try introduce that will go right to parental responsibilities. And, ultimately, if our children are in school and doing well, they are not out doing crimes."


UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago
STUPID.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
4PackGirl
14 years ago
don't know what the answer is to this but i'm pretty sure it's not jailing the so-called parents. if they cared about their kids, they'd have them in school. how about taking the kids away from the 'parents' thusly reducing the amount of welfare benefits they receive? i dunno.
Porforis
14 years ago
That's it, I'm moving to France. Just kidding.
longtimefan
14 years ago

don't know what the answer is to this but i'm pretty sure it's not jailing the so-called parents. if they cared about their kids, they'd have them in school. how about taking the kids away from the 'parents' thusly reducing the amount of welfare benefits they receive? i dunno.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



So all the parents that dont show up are on welfare? I think you know the answer to that...

Hope no one losses focus of the point of all this...

Get the parents involved..

exemptions to the plan:

parents of children who are doing well in school, those who have health issues that render them unable to travel to school and those who are "actively engaged" with their child's teachers through e-mail, phone calls or letters



I AGREE sending parents to jail is stupid..Your going to take them away from the kids, which in turn leads to NO involvment at all, the very thing your trying to put an end to..

There has to be a different way to get them involved..

I know myself growing up in the early 70's my mom was at EVERY conference as were most of my friends moms and for most part we all did good in school..and stayed out of trouble..

I do recall one of my friends that didnt have the mom or dad show, ended up into drugs, alcohol, and skipping school in the 8th and 9th grade..After 9th grade he was gone..Dont even know where he went..

Now not saying it was all because his mom never showed, but it is odd that she didnt show and he was in trouble a lot..
Pack93z
14 years ago
I don't know what is more pathetic in this situation.

The fact that they are trying to pass such a law or the fact that the need is so apparent that they feel the need for such a law.

Most can have a child, but not everyone is fit to be a parent.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
4PackGirl
14 years ago

don't know what the answer is to this but i'm pretty sure it's not jailing the so-called parents. if they cared about their kids, they'd have them in school. how about taking the kids away from the 'parents' thusly reducing the amount of welfare benefits they receive? i dunno.

"longtimefan" wrote:



So all the parents that dont show up are on welfare? I think you know the answer to that...

Hope no one losses focus of the point of all this...

Get the parents involved..

exemptions to the plan:

parents of children who are doing well in school, those who have health issues that render them unable to travel to school and those who are "actively engaged" with their child's teachers through e-mail, phone calls or letters

"4PackGirl" wrote:



I AGREE sending parents to jail is stupid..Your going to take them away from the kids, which in turn leads to NO involvment at all, the very thing your trying to put an end to..

There has to be a different way to get them involved..

I know myself growing up in the early 70's my mom was at EVERY conference as were most of my friends moms and for most part we all did good in school..and stayed out of trouble..

I do recall one of my friends that didnt have the mom or dad show, ended up into drugs, alcohol, and skipping school in the 8th and 9th grade..After 9th grade he was gone..Dont even know where he went..

Now not saying it was all because his mom never showed, but it is odd that she didnt show and he was in trouble a lot..



i put the whole welfare thing in there just to see the reaction. bad julie. but honestly, take something from the parents that is of value besides their freedom. money came to mind the quickest.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
It amazes me that Americans actually think attendance at parent-teacher conferences should be mandatory by law -- and that failure to attend should be subject to penalty.
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
14 years ago
glad to hear it rourke. as long as we disagree on a subject, i'm happy. 😃
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
That made me grin. +1 😃
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (13h) : We have re-signed LB Isaiah McDuffie
Zero2Cool (2-Mar) : Jets taking calls for Davante Adams. That $38m cap number hurting lol
Zero2Cool (2-Mar) : Guess it's not official until the 12th
Zero2Cool (2-Mar) : Deebo went for a 5th to Commanders?
Martha Careful (1-Mar) : Just like my late husband!!
Zero2Cool (1-Mar) : Once fired up, it should be good
Zero2Cool (1-Mar) : Sometimes, the first page load will be slow. it's firing up the site.
Martha Careful (1-Mar) : The site is operating much faster...tyvm
Mucky Tundra (28-Feb) : It's the offseason and the draft is still nearly 2 months away, what can ya do?🤷‍♂️
Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : NFL teams were notified today that the 2025 salary cap has been set at $279,200,000 per club.
Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : sssllllooooow
Martha Careful (27-Feb) : is it just me, or has the website been slow the last couple of days?
buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Damnit 2026 2nd rnd pick!
buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Packers get Myles Garret and Browns 2926 2nd rnd pick.
buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Browns get Jaire, + Packers #1 2025 pick and 2026 3rd rnd pick.
beast (26-Feb) : Rams trying to trade Stafford and Kupp, then signing Rodgers and Adams? Just speculation, but interesting
Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Packers shopping Jaire Alexander per Ian Rapoport
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : Gutekunst and Jaire Alexander’s agent, John Thornton, are meeting this week in Indianapolis to determine the future of the Packers’ 28-year-
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : Gutekunst says Mark Murphy told him he can trade their first-round pick despite the draft being in Green Bay.
Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : Packers. 🤦
Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : One team.
Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : One team petition NFL to ban Brotherly Shove.
beast (23-Feb) : Seems like he was just pissed because he was no longer the starter
beast (23-Feb) : Campbell is right, he's rich and he doesn't have to explain sh!t... but that attitude gives teams reasons to never sign him again.
dfosterf (22-Feb) : I have some doubt about all that
dfosterf (22-Feb) : I read De'Vondre Campbell's tweet this morning (via the New York Post) Florio says that if he invested his earnings wisely, he will be good
beast (20-Feb) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.
dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16h / Random Babble / dfosterf

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

28-Feb / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

24-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.