Yeah, I noticed this and said something about it. I of course was mocked and basically told how stupid I was and didn't know what I was talking about.
"Silentio" wrote:
Me too! I don't know why Rodgers deserves to be exempt from criticism. IMO Rodgers has a long way to go until he is truly is as good as Farve.
"Chutzpah515" wrote:
Okay, this is a stupid comment. Everyone take a minute and read what Chutzpah wrote. Go ahead, I'll wait.
Now, we all had many years to watch Favre as a Packer and now we get to watch him as a god-forsaken Viking. Now everyone imagine in your mind what it is like to watch Favre play football. What kind of player is he? What kind of "fundamentals" does he have? What do announcers constantly say about the way he plays?
Favre is the KING of throwing the ball on the move, from his back foot, from he knees, while falling down. I can't remember the number of times Favre HEAVED the ball across his body from side line to side line while standing on his back foot and falling out of bounds. Special quarterbacks don't need to take a long beautiful stride into the throw the way John Kitna does. Chris Collinsworth said as much last night about Rodgers footwork.
Is Rodgers footwork weird? Yeah, but he's good enough that it isn't the end of the world. In fact, it's a benefit. Bringing in Favre to critique Rodgers fundamentals is laughable.
"Zero2Cool" wrote: