Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Prescriptive grammarians would say to use "that" for essential clauses and "which" for nonessential clauses.

Essential: "I need to remember to get the dog that I bought last month fixed." Without the subordinate clause, we wouldn't know which dog is being referenced.

Nonessential: "The dog that I bought last night, which I personally believe is the most beautiful specimen I've ever seen, still needs to get fixed." The specific dog has already been referenced; the subordinate clause adds nonessential information.

As for "that that" and "that which," here are some examples:

"I didn't have the heart to tell her that that picture was worthless."

"That which does not kill you will only make you stronger."
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago
Wade stole my thunder. I always remember how to state this stuff correctly by eliminating the 2nd person in the sentence and refer to it as if it were just me. So, I'd look at those statements and determine which is grammatically correct by like this:

A) Jimmy and me went to the ice cream shop. Me went to the ice cream shop. Nope.
B) Jimmy and I went to the ice cream shop. I went to the ice cream shop. Sounds great.

A) Mom gave Jimmy and I an ice cream cone. Mom gave I an ice cream cone. Nope.
B) Mom gave Jimmy and me an ice cream cone. Mom gave me an ice cream cone. Yuppers.

As far as the last one, neither sounds right, but I would personally use the first option. Only because I wouldn't know how to state it correctly.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

Which of the following constructions are correct? +1 to whomever gets all of them correctly and can explain why they are correct.

A) Jimmy and me went to the ice cream shop.
B) Jimmy and I went to the ice cream shop.

A) Mom gave Jimmy and I an ice cream cone.
B) Mom gave Jimmy and me an ice cream cone.

A) Aren't I the right person for the job?
B) Ain't I the right person for the job?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



B. It's Jimmy and I if you are the subject

B. It's Jimmy and me if you are the object

A. Because the B option sounds too gangsta and just plain wrong.

I really don't know about the subject/object thing, I just picked whichever option sounded better and tried to rationalize it in some random way lol.
This is a placeholder
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

Which of the following constructions are correct? +1 to whomever gets all of them correctly and can explain why they are correct.

A) Jimmy and me went to the ice cream shop.
B) Jimmy and I went to the ice cream shop.

A) Mom gave Jimmy and I an ice cream cone.
B) Mom gave Jimmy and me an ice cream cone.

A) Aren't I the right person for the job?
B) Ain't I the right person for the job?

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



B. It's Jimmy and I if you are the subject

B. It's Jimmy and me if you are the object

A. Because the B option sounds too gangsta and just plain wrong.

I really don't know about the subject/object thing, I just picked whichever option sounded better and tried to rationalize it in some random way lol.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Finland's approach is actually pretty sound.

It's generally my approach.

I'm convinced that the way to learn grammar and usage is by reading. I've never had particularly good grammarians as teachers. Oh, I've picked up a piece here and there from teachers, and more from books like Strunk and White, Fowler, etc (I have a couple dozen lying around in various places).

But the way you change your language practices is largely by osmosis -- as a result of who you listen to. And reading is a form of listening. Questions like Rourke's that ask for a "rule" tend to stump me, because I don't know the rules by name.

I just know what works, and what doesn't. And what sounds barbarous.

About the only rules I try to live by in my writing are Orwell's. (Of course, as Dakota and others will point out, trying is often not succeeding. 🙂 )

Anyway, this is probably a good time to quote Orwell, and give a link to what I think is the most important essay ever written on why attention to language matters.

Orwell's 6 rules:
1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

Orwell's original article can be found lots of places. Here's one: Politics and the English Language 

I wish I would have remembered to post this before people voted.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
The answers to the first two questions have been successfully identified repeatedly. (Good job, by the way.) I'm still waiting for someone to step up on the third. 🙂
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
14 years ago
don't say ain't cuz ain't ain't a word. well it wasn't when i learned that little diddy. i'm sure by now its been added to the dictionary.
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

The answers to the first two questions have been successfully identified repeatedly. (Good job, by the way.) I'm still waiting for someone to step up on the third. :)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I'm guessing it's neither. Would it be "Am I not the right man for this job?" then?
This is a placeholder
Cheesey
14 years ago
"Grammer Police?"
Are those the cops that arrest Kelsey Grammer every time he gets drunk???

Oh....and Wade gets a +1 from me! FUNNY answer!!!
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago

Prescriptive grammarians would say to use "that" for essential clauses and "which" for nonessential clauses.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


What would you use for "Santa Clauses?"
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago

The answers to the first two questions have been successfully identified repeatedly. (Good job, by the way.) I'm still waiting for someone to step up on the third. :)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I'm under the impression they're both wrong. "Aren't I" is a contraction for "Are not I" and that should really be "Am I not." "Ain't" is always wrong because it's slang. However, if we count slang, "Ain't" would be more correct than "Aren't I."

Oh and props to Formo. I correct my own English by the same method Formo does.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
    buckeyepackfan (13h) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
    Zero2Cool (19h) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
    wpr (20h) : I made it through the 1st Q.
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
    beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
    Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
    TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
    beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
    beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
    Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
    Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
    beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
    beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
    beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
    Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
    wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
    Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
    Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
    Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
    Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
    dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    6h / Around The NFL / packerfanoutwest

    13h / Fantasy Sports Talk / buckeyepackfan

    14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    10-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    10-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.