Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Prescriptive grammarians would say to use "that" for essential clauses and "which" for nonessential clauses.

Essential: "I need to remember to get the dog that I bought last month fixed." Without the subordinate clause, we wouldn't know which dog is being referenced.

Nonessential: "The dog that I bought last night, which I personally believe is the most beautiful specimen I've ever seen, still needs to get fixed." The specific dog has already been referenced; the subordinate clause adds nonessential information.

As for "that that" and "that which," here are some examples:

"I didn't have the heart to tell her that that picture was worthless."

"That which does not kill you will only make you stronger."
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago
Wade stole my thunder. I always remember how to state this stuff correctly by eliminating the 2nd person in the sentence and refer to it as if it were just me. So, I'd look at those statements and determine which is grammatically correct by like this:

A) Jimmy and me went to the ice cream shop. Me went to the ice cream shop. Nope.
B) Jimmy and I went to the ice cream shop. I went to the ice cream shop. Sounds great.

A) Mom gave Jimmy and I an ice cream cone. Mom gave I an ice cream cone. Nope.
B) Mom gave Jimmy and me an ice cream cone. Mom gave me an ice cream cone. Yuppers.

As far as the last one, neither sounds right, but I would personally use the first option. Only because I wouldn't know how to state it correctly.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

Which of the following constructions are correct? +1 to whomever gets all of them correctly and can explain why they are correct.

A) Jimmy and me went to the ice cream shop.
B) Jimmy and I went to the ice cream shop.

A) Mom gave Jimmy and I an ice cream cone.
B) Mom gave Jimmy and me an ice cream cone.

A) Aren't I the right person for the job?
B) Ain't I the right person for the job?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



B. It's Jimmy and I if you are the subject

B. It's Jimmy and me if you are the object

A. Because the B option sounds too gangsta and just plain wrong.

I really don't know about the subject/object thing, I just picked whichever option sounded better and tried to rationalize it in some random way lol.
This is a placeholder
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

Which of the following constructions are correct? +1 to whomever gets all of them correctly and can explain why they are correct.

A) Jimmy and me went to the ice cream shop.
B) Jimmy and I went to the ice cream shop.

A) Mom gave Jimmy and I an ice cream cone.
B) Mom gave Jimmy and me an ice cream cone.

A) Aren't I the right person for the job?
B) Ain't I the right person for the job?

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



B. It's Jimmy and I if you are the subject

B. It's Jimmy and me if you are the object

A. Because the B option sounds too gangsta and just plain wrong.

I really don't know about the subject/object thing, I just picked whichever option sounded better and tried to rationalize it in some random way lol.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Finland's approach is actually pretty sound.

It's generally my approach.

I'm convinced that the way to learn grammar and usage is by reading. I've never had particularly good grammarians as teachers. Oh, I've picked up a piece here and there from teachers, and more from books like Strunk and White, Fowler, etc (I have a couple dozen lying around in various places).

But the way you change your language practices is largely by osmosis -- as a result of who you listen to. And reading is a form of listening. Questions like Rourke's that ask for a "rule" tend to stump me, because I don't know the rules by name.

I just know what works, and what doesn't. And what sounds barbarous.

About the only rules I try to live by in my writing are Orwell's. (Of course, as Dakota and others will point out, trying is often not succeeding. 🙂 )

Anyway, this is probably a good time to quote Orwell, and give a link to what I think is the most important essay ever written on why attention to language matters.

Orwell's 6 rules:
1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

Orwell's original article can be found lots of places. Here's one: Politics and the English Language 

I wish I would have remembered to post this before people voted.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
The answers to the first two questions have been successfully identified repeatedly. (Good job, by the way.) I'm still waiting for someone to step up on the third. 🙂
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
14 years ago
don't say ain't cuz ain't ain't a word. well it wasn't when i learned that little diddy. i'm sure by now its been added to the dictionary.
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

The answers to the first two questions have been successfully identified repeatedly. (Good job, by the way.) I'm still waiting for someone to step up on the third. :)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I'm guessing it's neither. Would it be "Am I not the right man for this job?" then?
This is a placeholder
Cheesey
14 years ago
"Grammer Police?"
Are those the cops that arrest Kelsey Grammer every time he gets drunk???

Oh....and Wade gets a +1 from me! FUNNY answer!!!
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago

Prescriptive grammarians would say to use "that" for essential clauses and "which" for nonessential clauses.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


What would you use for "Santa Clauses?"
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago

The answers to the first two questions have been successfully identified repeatedly. (Good job, by the way.) I'm still waiting for someone to step up on the third. :)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I'm under the impression they're both wrong. "Aren't I" is a contraction for "Are not I" and that should really be "Am I not." "Ain't" is always wrong because it's slang. However, if we count slang, "Ain't" would be more correct than "Aren't I."

Oh and props to Formo. I correct my own English by the same method Formo does.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (4m) : According to reports, Mel Kiper is furious that Sanders wasn't selected as the new Pope
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Time taken to get picked:
    Zero2Cool (1h) : New Pope: 2 days | Shedeur Sanders: 3 days
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Collin Whitchurch @cowhitchurch · 1h Chicago got a pope before it got a QB to throw for 4,000 yards in a season.
    Mucky Tundra (2h) : New Pope from Chicago; in other words, the city produced a Pope before a 4000 yard passer
    beast (7-May) : My first name starts with R and my beer belly is quite voluptuous! Thank you for noticing 😏
    Zero2Cool (7-May) : beast, you're just one R from being voluptuous.
    Zero2Cool (7-May) : And now some Packers blogger is like Doubs to Steelers makes sense!!!!
    Zero2Cool (7-May) : You saw me Tweet???
    beast (7-May) : Supposedly Steelers will be trading WR George Pickens to the Cowboys for a 3rd and late round pick swap
    Zero2Cool (5-May) : Ravens release Justin Tucker, err D. Watson Jr?
    Zero2Cool (5-May) : Cardinals have signed TE Josiah Deguara.
    Zero2Cool (5-May) : If I were to "Google" it, then I wouldn't read it in your words.
    Martha Careful (5-May) : Yes, in the military S2’s work on IPB, PERCEC, PHYSEC and IO
    dfosterf (4-May) : FYI civilian companies swipe the S2 designation from the military. S2 is the intelligence branch up to brigade level. G2 is division level.
    dfosterf (4-May) : Google it. Make sure to tack NFL on it or you will get the military meaning
    Zero2Cool (4-May) : S2?
    beast (4-May) : Seems like the S2 has a love/hate relationship with professional scouts.
    beast (4-May) : In theory, the S2 test how quickly a QBs brain can solve game like issues and how quickly they can do it.
    dfosterf (4-May) : Are you gentlemen and at least one lady familiar with the S2 cognition
    Zero2Cool (4-May) : Maybe there isn't an issue.
    beast (4-May) : NFL really needs to fix their position labeling issue, but I don't think they care
    Zero2Cool (1-May) : Packers did not activate the fifth-year options for linebacker Quay Walker, with the goal of signing him to a contract extension.
    Zero2Cool (1-May) : Matthew Golden spoke with Randall Cobb before draft. Looked like chance encounter.
    packerfanoutwest (1-May) : from a head left turn?
    packerfanoutwest (1-May) : someone drunk?
    Zero2Cool (1-May) : Unlikely.
    dfosterf (30-Apr) : How long until Jeff Sperbeck's family sues John Elway ?
    Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : Packers are exercising the fifth-year option on DT Devonte Wyatt, locking in a guaranteed $12.9M for the 2026 season.
    beast (30-Apr) : Sounds like P Luke Elzinga has a rookie try out opportunity from the Titans
    dfosterf (30-Apr) : Luke Elzinga Punter Oklahoma stil unsigned. Green Bay has been mentioned as good fit
    beast (30-Apr) : The Packers re-signed three exclusive rights free agents WR Melton, P Whelan and RB Wilson.
    Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : February 5, 2002 (age 23) ok no. packers.com is wrong
    Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Micah Robinson is only 19??
    Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : 6 first rounders on Packers defense now
    Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : LB Isaiah Simmons. Signed. Called it!!! Oh yeah!
    Martha Careful (29-Apr) : ty bboystyle...fat fingers
    bboystyle (29-Apr) : Tom*
    Martha Careful (28-Apr) : RIP Packer Safety Tim Brown
    beast (27-Apr) : Yeah, but also some of the wording suggestions Jax only pranked called the QB, not the others... and if he had an open spreadsheet & 3 calls
    beast (27-Apr) : Thank goodness he's not leaving the Turtle in the Red Tide
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Cowboys 1st round pick Tyler Booker will indeed be bringing his pet turtle to Dallas with him
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : that contained all prospects info and contact
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : beast, according the Falcons statement Jax came across it on an ipad. If I had to guess, probably an open spread sheet or something
    Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : Simmons put up an emoji with cheese.
    beast (27-Apr) : Not sure anyone is interested in Isaiah Simmons... Collin Oliver might of taken his potential slot
    beast (27-Apr) : I'm going with Jax Ulbrich is not telling the whole truth... he accidentally came across it? Why would a defensive coordinator have a QB #?
    Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : He's not that great, but final piece of the script.\
    Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : If we add Isaiah Simmons, book your Super Bowl tickets
    Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Colts 1st round TE Tyler Warren also got prank called, was that Jax Ulbrich as well?
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    3-May / Packers Draft Threads / Martha Careful

    3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.