Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Prescriptive grammarians would say to use "that" for essential clauses and "which" for nonessential clauses.

Essential: "I need to remember to get the dog that I bought last month fixed." Without the subordinate clause, we wouldn't know which dog is being referenced.

Nonessential: "The dog that I bought last night, which I personally believe is the most beautiful specimen I've ever seen, still needs to get fixed." The specific dog has already been referenced; the subordinate clause adds nonessential information.

As for "that that" and "that which," here are some examples:

"I didn't have the heart to tell her that that picture was worthless."

"That which does not kill you will only make you stronger."
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago
Wade stole my thunder. I always remember how to state this stuff correctly by eliminating the 2nd person in the sentence and refer to it as if it were just me. So, I'd look at those statements and determine which is grammatically correct by like this:

A) Jimmy and me went to the ice cream shop. Me went to the ice cream shop. Nope.
B) Jimmy and I went to the ice cream shop. I went to the ice cream shop. Sounds great.

A) Mom gave Jimmy and I an ice cream cone. Mom gave I an ice cream cone. Nope.
B) Mom gave Jimmy and me an ice cream cone. Mom gave me an ice cream cone. Yuppers.

As far as the last one, neither sounds right, but I would personally use the first option. Only because I wouldn't know how to state it correctly.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

Which of the following constructions are correct? +1 to whomever gets all of them correctly and can explain why they are correct.

A) Jimmy and me went to the ice cream shop.
B) Jimmy and I went to the ice cream shop.

A) Mom gave Jimmy and I an ice cream cone.
B) Mom gave Jimmy and me an ice cream cone.

A) Aren't I the right person for the job?
B) Ain't I the right person for the job?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



B. It's Jimmy and I if you are the subject

B. It's Jimmy and me if you are the object

A. Because the B option sounds too gangsta and just plain wrong.

I really don't know about the subject/object thing, I just picked whichever option sounded better and tried to rationalize it in some random way lol.
This is a placeholder
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

Which of the following constructions are correct? +1 to whomever gets all of them correctly and can explain why they are correct.

A) Jimmy and me went to the ice cream shop.
B) Jimmy and I went to the ice cream shop.

A) Mom gave Jimmy and I an ice cream cone.
B) Mom gave Jimmy and me an ice cream cone.

A) Aren't I the right person for the job?
B) Ain't I the right person for the job?

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



B. It's Jimmy and I if you are the subject

B. It's Jimmy and me if you are the object

A. Because the B option sounds too gangsta and just plain wrong.

I really don't know about the subject/object thing, I just picked whichever option sounded better and tried to rationalize it in some random way lol.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Finland's approach is actually pretty sound.

It's generally my approach.

I'm convinced that the way to learn grammar and usage is by reading. I've never had particularly good grammarians as teachers. Oh, I've picked up a piece here and there from teachers, and more from books like Strunk and White, Fowler, etc (I have a couple dozen lying around in various places).

But the way you change your language practices is largely by osmosis -- as a result of who you listen to. And reading is a form of listening. Questions like Rourke's that ask for a "rule" tend to stump me, because I don't know the rules by name.

I just know what works, and what doesn't. And what sounds barbarous.

About the only rules I try to live by in my writing are Orwell's. (Of course, as Dakota and others will point out, trying is often not succeeding. 🙂 )

Anyway, this is probably a good time to quote Orwell, and give a link to what I think is the most important essay ever written on why attention to language matters.

Orwell's 6 rules:
1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

Orwell's original article can be found lots of places. Here's one: Politics and the English Language 

I wish I would have remembered to post this before people voted.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
The answers to the first two questions have been successfully identified repeatedly. (Good job, by the way.) I'm still waiting for someone to step up on the third. 🙂
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
14 years ago
don't say ain't cuz ain't ain't a word. well it wasn't when i learned that little diddy. i'm sure by now its been added to the dictionary.
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

The answers to the first two questions have been successfully identified repeatedly. (Good job, by the way.) I'm still waiting for someone to step up on the third. :)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I'm guessing it's neither. Would it be "Am I not the right man for this job?" then?
This is a placeholder
Cheesey
14 years ago
"Grammer Police?"
Are those the cops that arrest Kelsey Grammer every time he gets drunk???

Oh....and Wade gets a +1 from me! FUNNY answer!!!
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago

Prescriptive grammarians would say to use "that" for essential clauses and "which" for nonessential clauses.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


What would you use for "Santa Clauses?"
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago

The answers to the first two questions have been successfully identified repeatedly. (Good job, by the way.) I'm still waiting for someone to step up on the third. :)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I'm under the impression they're both wrong. "Aren't I" is a contraction for "Are not I" and that should really be "Am I not." "Ain't" is always wrong because it's slang. However, if we count slang, "Ain't" would be more correct than "Aren't I."

Oh and props to Formo. I correct my own English by the same method Formo does.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    beast (5h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
    Martha Careful (9h) : meh
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
    Zero2Cool (13h) : It's so awesome.
    Zero2Cool (13h) : new site fan shout post fast
    wpr (16h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
    wpr (16h) : Only 4
    wpr (16h) : Only 4
    Zero2Cool (19h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
    dfosterf (20h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
    wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
    beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
    wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
    Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
    dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

    16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

    28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.