musccy
  • musccy
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
It's been 12 hours so we can be critical now :)

What on earth was going on with the backshoulder passes last night? ESPN was showing the Rodgers interview as he was addressing that specific question, but then cut away because lord burt was talking.

The wrs/aaron weren't just a little off, they were MILES off on those throws last night. Typically, if it was a mistake by the wr, you see aaron showing more emotion and yelling at his wrs, which leads me to believe he just threw some ducks out there.
yooperfan
14 years ago
Yeah, what the hell was up with that!
I was really questioning Rodgers but maybe it was the recievers.
At anyrate being the QB Rodgers was the one who came off looking really bad.
Had the Packers lost I think this would have turned into a bigger deal than it will be.
Hopefully they get that aspect of the game straightened out.
Greg C.
14 years ago
It was weird. I kept thinking, which of these QBs didn't attend training camp? It must've been mostly Aaron's fault, because it happened with several different receivers.

I think they've become overly reliant on those back shoulder throws this year. I've always liked those plays, but they shouldn't be run so often because they rely on an element of surprise. They were lucky that none of those throws were picked off last night. One of them got picked off against the Lions.
blank
mi_keys
14 years ago
They weren't ducks as they had tight spirals. Aaron and the receivers were not on the same page. On a lot of those back shoulder throws the receivers never stopped. Clearly Rodgers thought they were stopping and the receivers thought they had fly routes. I tend to agree with Greg that Rodgers was probably off because these issues happened with Jennings, Jones, and Jordy. The common factor was Rodgers. It was one of the few consistently disappointing aspects of last night and it's something that probably kept us from scoring a few more times.
Born and bred a cheesehead
14 years ago
I'm sure it's a matter of how the defender is playing his coverage and what type of coverage there is by the safeties. Sort of an option route, either go or do the back shoulder. They just weren't seeing the same thing. It's the only time it has happened like this all season so I'm assuming the Vikings were doing something to confuse either Rodgers or the WRs.

Regardless, it's something they have to correct.
gbguy20
14 years ago

I'm sure it's a matter of how the defender is playing his coverage and what type of coverage there is by the safeties. Sort of an option route, either go or do the back shoulder. They just weren't seeing the same thing. It's the only time it has happened like this all season so I'm assuming the Vikings were doing something to confuse either Rodgers or the WRs.

Regardless, it's something they have to correct.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



Thats what it is. They are option routes based on the defense. The only problem with this design is the WR and QB always have to be reading the defense the same way, or we get the results we saw last night. It's going to be pretty hard to determine who had the faulty reads without going back to watch the game film. I really don't care who is to blame, I just want this mistakes to few and far between.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
You guys aren't going to get perfection from a QB. Ever.

The highest pass completion % in a season is 70.6% and that was done by both Drew Brees and Ken Anderson. I don't remember whether or not 100% was ever done in a game.

I noticed four or five of them. They were uncatchable by everyone, including (and especially including) the defense. It's not like those were wobbly balls that were catchable by the defender. They were tight spirals that went far out of bounds.

Good. If you're not going to complete a pass, make sure the defender doesn't have a shot at it either.

I really don't see the purpose of dissecting these. I see it as an anomaly, but one that didn't hurt us.

This is something that will be discussed in practice and it's more than likely a freak occurrence. I don't think it's something to be overly concerned about.
My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Yerko
14 years ago
Even if the correct route was ran on most throws, the balls were completely off target.

It was strange seeing Rodgers and his receivers so off last night. They were never really on the same page.
musccy
  • musccy
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

You guys aren't going to get perfection from a QB. Ever.
The highest pass completion % in a season is 70.6% and that was done by both Drew Brees and Ken Anderson. I don't remember whether or not 100% was ever done in a game.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



The throws I'm referencing had nothing to do with accuracy, more being on the same page with the WRs as others have alluded to with reading the defense.

On 5 or so throws Rodgers obviously wanted to throw a back sholder pass, and not once did the wr read the same route. It's a curiosity in communication, not accuracy that I'm inquiring about.
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago
I think it was Rodgers. Besides the throws they were calling back shoulder, that were no where close. There were others that were just uncatchable. The throw to Jordy, they were saying well he stopped. Even if he hadn't that ball was no place close to where Jordy would even have a chance.

Rodgers is making bad throws, and has for many games. Not terrible overall, but not what we expect.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (17h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

37m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

19h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.