Finley88Beast
14 years ago
http://www.packers.com/news-and-events/article-1/Mike-McCarthy-Press-Conf-Transcript---Oct-18/4afbe793-cb17-4350-8029-0aa71c87d4b8 

OK, Ill start with the injuries from the game. Brady Poppinga will have arthroscopic surgery in the morning, and well have the details from that once Dr. Pat McKenzie completes the surgery. Donald Driver had a quad strain. He will probably miss some practice time this week. A.J. Hawk had a groin strain, and he should also probably miss some practice time. With that Ill take your questions.

(Did you get a chance to watch the penalty on Francois again on the punt?)
Sure did. I had an opportunity to watch all the tape. Had an opportunity to watch the punt after the game.

(You have used that formation a few times. Did anyone warn you in the past about it?)
Its a new rule this year. Its something that a lot of conversation during the preseason about the formation. Its a formation thats been used against us probably on a weekly basis. We used it throughout the game. The rule states that the player cannot be within a yard of the center. The intent of the rule is for the safety of the snapper. The origin of it really started on field goals, and it was carried over to punt. We had used that formation earlier in the game. Its a legal formation. Why it took so long for the flag and so forth, I do not understand that part. Its illegal formation, offsides, things like that. Just the process of it is whats disturbing. But Robert Francois was lined up a yard from the center. Thats what the film shows.

(Is there any advantage to him lining up a yard away? Should he maybe play it safe and line up 2 yards back?)
Let me ask you this, because I was asked the same question last night. What is the difference between lining up over the ball, if youre the nose guard? Would I tell the nose guard to line up six inches away from the football, just so maybe hes not offsides? Six inches is the difference in a lot of things, particularly at the line of scrimmage. The rule states not within a yard. Theres a reason why you have individuals lined up in certain positions. You want to get as close to a yard as you possibly can. I dont think thats any different as far as the teaching purpose that goes on throughout formations, defensive fronts, bump-and-run technique, where the receiver is crowding the ball, whether the defensive line is crowding the ball from the other side. The rule states not within a yard.

(Are you baffled by the call?)
Baffled? Ill just say this. When pre-snap penalties are called, illegal formations are called, offsides called, usually the flag comes out immediately. The same situation occurred in our Detroit game, the flag came out immediately. Now, just the timing of it is what sets you back a bit. After a timeout, to be in the huddle and then the flag to come out that late. I think the process is something that needs to be looked at. If someone lines up wrong, the flag should be thrown immediately, in my opinion.

(But you do think your guy was lined up legally?)
I think the film illustrates that, yes.

(How much longer can you go with some of these punts that are putting you in bad field position?)
The punting was not good yesterday. I think thats obvious. Tim has been inconsistent, and my mindset in preparation for Minnesota is to keep working with Tim and get him to be more consistent. Frankly I thought he did a good job with his inside the 20, the two punts going in, but the opportunity to change the field position did not happen, especially when we needed it there in overtime. So he needs to do a better job.

(What will your approach be with Al Harris and Atari Bigby?)
Well actually were going to start practicing all three guys coming off of PUP, and frankly, just want to see them out there in the group drills, in the team drills and just see where they are. Because they cant do any more than theyve done from a rehab standpoint. So its time to cut those guys loose. I know theyre excited about it, and were excited to get them on the practice field.

(Do you have any sense from talking to the doctors where they are or do you just have to see them in practice?)
Well, really when you get to this point from a rehab standpoint, really this is when the doctors turn them over to the coaches. Theres nothing else that they feel they can do for all three players as far as getting them ready to play. Its time for them to get into football activities and find out exactly where they are.

(Do you any sense that one of the three is ahead of the others?)
I think Ill answer that Wednesday. Really, I just want to see them out there in practice. If you talk to them, especially when youre the head coach and you talk to players about injuries, theyre always fine. Theyre always playing this week, and theyre always good. And you appreciate that. But well find out about those guys Wednesday.

(But the window to start practicing could be later, so I assume you are hearing good things from the doctors?)
Yes. Theyre professionals. If you just watch them go through the rehab with Mark Lovat and Flea (asst. athletic trainer Bryan Engel), theyre ready. Theyre ready to cross this last hurdle, so its been all positive, yes.

(How much can Starks help you, given the fact that he missed his senior season and most of OTAs and all of training camp?)
I think its obvious thats a huge question mark. Atari and Al Harris have battled, have played in games here, know our system of football. Youre talking about two veterans. Starks is really, we just want to get him out and see him in pads and get him in that environment. Were really evaluating him totally differently.

(When you look at the close games with Aaron, 1-11 is a pretty stark number. How do you break that down? What do you take from that?)
Its become a situation. Anytime you have a tendency and its produced negative results, you have to look at everything. You have to look at the plays youre calling, you have to look at the execution of it, the defenses that youre getting in those particular situations. Ive created a situation column on my call sheet for that, and well continue to evaluate that. I think were a different team than we were two years ago, and I do think this year is different because the result is the same, and I totally understand the point of the record and so forth, but there are positives within that. That last drive, to go down and to score to put the game into overtime. In Detroit, they go down and score, and then at the end of that game. And then you look at the Washington game, some of the things that happened, theyre correctible. I dont think its something that were doing wrong. Frankly, its a situation thats been evaluated, no different than third down and red zone and everything else has been evaluated on a weekly basis. Well just continue to work at it, and we need to do a better job. Theres no doubt about it.

(How much of it is on Rodgers, because there were also games in 2008 where you either missed field goals or the defense gave up a score after you took the lead?)
It is going to either be real good or real bad. That is just the nature of the quarterback position in the National Football League, and even more so our offensive system is built around making the quarterback successful. Its a quarterback-friendly system, and anybody that has knowledge of the history of the West Coast offense understands the teaching philosophy and the starting point of how the offense is built from the ground up. And he is a very accountable young man and hell continue to work. Its not going to change the way we approach games and so forth, but its a situation that we probably have to maybe spend time on, which is obviously a concern just the way we have been practicing lately just because of other circumstances. Its a situation we need to do a better job in.

(How much trouble did Cameron Wake give you and were there things you could have done differently?)
A good football player. We had chips and so forth and you have things built in, but also they have things that they can do too to take the back off of it and so forth. The five sacks, and just really going back to that penalty discussion, I dont want to take away anything from Miamis victory because I think if you look at the way their productivity in all three phases, they earned that victory yesterday. As far as the production they had with their offense, the 26 first downs, and they won the field-position battle on special teams. When you generate five sacks and they had the turnover against our offense, it definitely was a victory that they earned, so I dont want to take anything away from that. I am going to stand up here and look like I am complaining about penalties. But as far as Wake, he is a good football player. We did some very basic things. There is a lot of carryover this week from last week, really two similar defenses we played back-to-back. As far as did we line the tight end up over there a bunch and chip him and so forth? No, but as far as the timing and the throws and the protections we had in the plan with Bryan, I felt very comfortable with the position we put him in. But our timing is not where it needs to be, and that is everything. I am talking about the protection, the footwork of the quarterback, the route running. When we do it, we make it look very easy, and when we dont, we have moments like we did yesterday.

(Was there something they were doing with the sacks?)
You need to look at the sacks. Not all of those sacks were created by the defense. There are a couple of those sacks from our perspective, from our evaluation, that should not occur. Whether it was the timing and the footwork of the quarterback, the last sack on third down we just didnt pick up the Ted Thompson game with the Mike on the delayed blitz. We just didnt handle that very well at all. It is the same thing as last week. You have five sacks, those are big plays in the game. It changes field position, it changes momentum, there are a lot of things that come out of that, and we have done a good job up until the last two weeks. There has been a little carryover in last weeks game to this week, and we need to get that ready because we have an excellent defensive line in Minnesota coming in here Sunday.

(Do you have a feel for Matthews and Pickett this week?)
No, I dont. Like I said, they are going to play. That is what I am told. They want to play. They are going to do everything they can to get on the field. They both tested Sunday morning before Miami, but they werent ready to go. Well see how the week goes and Ill have a better feel probably Thursday I would think.

(Any clue on Tauscher?)
Getting better. I would say he is still a ways away, but he is getting better, getting stronger.

(Is there anything that stands out on third down, and do you know why you are seeing so much two-man?)
I think the two teams that we just played are really similar defenses. That is what they believe in, and it isnt like they came in and did a bunch of new things for us. Two-man, if you can keep Aaron Rodgers in the pocket, thats a good coverage to play. But it starts with protection, it starts with the footwork and the timing and everything of your quarterback and making the right decisions, and us winning the one-on-one battles. We had some one-on-one battles, especially earlythe thing that is frustrating about us on third downs is the third-and 1 to 5s. We hit on two third-and-11-pluses yesterday, and we start the game with two one-on-ones in the third-and-1 to 5 area and we dont convert those. So we need to do a better job winning the one-on-one battles, whether it is the catch, the separation, and its just really football. Its technical football.

(Are you close to acquiring Anthony Smith?)
Yes, we are in the process of acquiring Anthony Smith. Im not supposed to say that until it is done, but I think it may be here shortly. Anthony has a history with us, has played in this defense, and we think he is a good fit. It will be great to have him back.

(Are you looking at him more to fill the special-teams spot created by Martins injury?)
We have lost two safeties, so were looking at him at both the safety position and special teams.

(Have you made a decision yet on Finley?)
That is actually where the spot will come from. Jermichael Finley will go to IR and Anthony Smith will come on the 53.

(Was there any way IR could have been avoided?)
This is completely in the best interests of Jermichael Finleys future, so that was not avoidable.


A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Wow, he was pretty straightforward about putting Finley on IR for his future. Didn't expect that.

He seems pretty pissed about that punt (as he should be). Yeah, that's something weird. I wonder why it wasn't called right away. And he says we've been doing that all game long and why was it called then? And why was it called late, after the fact?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Finley88Beast
14 years ago
MM is smarter than a lot of you guys account him for he explains things well when other head coaches just speak lightly on key things.Thing is we need more execution out of are football team its not MM its not the playcalling its pure execution need to get into a rhythm and start making plays.Whole team should be blamed not just the coaches.Im pretty confindent we can get things fixed.

Edit:MM brought up a good thing smith will improve are ST.Hope he gets time playing there too.
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
twebdonny
14 years ago
Mike McCarthy is a BUFFOON!
www.travel-ascending.com
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I read a comment from someone claiming to have been at the game and they said there was no flag even thrown. (on the punt formation crap)
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Mike McCarthy is smarter than a lot of you guys account him for

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



Finley - I just wanted to touch on this and this alone.

MM is a smart man. I don't doubt that. Loved him in '07. He made all the right calls, except for one - he failed to take over the D against the Giants. He let his DC be stubborn and not make adjustments. Had I been MM, I would have overruled the DC as the HC has the authority to do that.

Now, MM isn't adjusting. So I'm wondering what happened to the MM I used to love? Is this guy an imposter who looks like MM?

You cannot keep the same game plan if you have key injuries. You also have to change the game plan if it has become clear the other team has found weaknesses in it.

MM used to be good at that. He isn't any more. I can't answer why as I don't know him personally.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
coltonja
14 years ago

Mike McCarthy is smarter than a lot of you guys account him for he explains things well when other head coaches just speak lightly on key things.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



I'm shocked no one has gone crazy on you for saying this. Mike McCarthy has been the prime example of the exact opposite of a coach like that (see Rex Ryan). Don't believe me? Ask any reader on this forum about "pad level." lol
UserPostedImage
Thanks to pack93z for the sig!!!
Pack93z
14 years ago

I read a comment from someone claiming to have been at the game and they said there was no flag even thrown. (on the punt formation crap)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Yes.. and that the Fins approached the officials during the TV.. can't say that they brought that to the refs attention.. but the math says probably.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Finley88Beast
14 years ago

Mike McCarthy is smarter than a lot of you guys account him for he explains things well when other head coaches just speak lightly on key things.

"coltonja" wrote:



I'm shocked no one has gone crazy on you for saying this.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



lmao me to
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
Chutzpah515
14 years ago
They forgot to put all McCarthy's "Umms" and stupid pauses into this transcript. Plus you miss out on his signature "glazed over" look.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.