Packers Strength,Weakness and How to Win the game.

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

Finley88Beast
Registered Topic Starter

14 years ago

Strength-The Packers strength in this game will be are Pass Rush no Clay Matthews or not(Pretty Confident he could play but im no expert 😛 )
More Players than Clay Matthews got pressure on the QB last game.Cullen Jenkins is so consistent at least 1 sack in each game so exciting to watch him and he got so much pressure as well.Mike Neal is also a good pass rusher he emerged last game with a sack and getting some pressure.And many more players that can pass rush BJ Raji,Zombo,Bisop,Woodson.We should give a young struggling QB in Chad Henne trouble and force maybe turnovers.

Weakness-It's hard to choose there is a couple of options...I could say are run game but it is improving each week.Are Offensive line could be the weakness especially with a good pass rusher in Cameran Wake watched him last week against the Pats hes like another Clay Matthews a moter that never stops.Bulaga could start again he did i guess a nice job on orakpo but we gave up a season high 4 sacks last game.This could be are weakness for the game.

How we will win the game-we need to be more balanced on offense believe it or not passing the whole game won't cut it.Jackson is improving each week lets get him the ball more.

Lets get back to the west coast offense and not a sort of spread offense Ik we want all are playmakers out but we need a rhythm in are offense.We should throw more screens it was a part of are offense that was a success last year.I saw 2 screens last game both plays worked out well 1 pass to jackson that got a good amount of yards,a staple that used to be in are offense were it was a run/pass bubble screen that got good yards.

So to win we need to be balanced on offense and get into a rhythm we dont need to spread it out all the time to get into a rhythm.

A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

Chutzpah515
Registered

14 years ago

Jackson is better, but anyone can improve from zero!

djcubez
Senior Member

14 years ago

I agree we need to get the screen back in our game plan. We don't have the greatest o-line and the screen is a play designed to cover that weakness.

nerdmann
Premier Member

14 years ago

Bjack can catch, but not well enough to run screens. For that we need Starks or Porter.
As far as Clay, I would hold him out in preparation for the Queens game the following week. Make sure you have him for that game. MM's career will be over if he gets de-pantsed by Favre again this year.
So let Clay rest that hammy, and run a 4-3 for this week. It's our Dlinemen who will be getting penetration. Neal, Raji, Jenkins mainly. I wouldn't be relying on Brad Jones or Poppinga. Zombo might get a little pressure, but I wouldn't count on it being consistent.
And put Bishop in the middle. Let Hawk be second string. If Bishop is capable of calling the defensive signals.
In fact, I'd even line Zombo up as a down lineman at defensive end. That's the position he played in college. He might be more effective in that position than as a 3-4 OLB.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

14 years ago

Strength should still be the D.

Weakness is Special Teams.

To win, use Jackson better. Run and catch. and get out of the shotgun once in a while. Shotgun is an advantage for Dline over Oline(except C)

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Finley88Beast
Registered Topic Starter

14 years ago

Bjack can catch, but not well enough to run screens. For that we need Starks or Porter.
As far as Clay, I would hold him out in preparation for the Queens game the following week. Make sure you have him for that game. Mike McCarthy's career will be over if he gets de-pantsed by Favre again this year.
So let Clay rest that hammy, and run a 4-3 for this week. It's our Dlinemen who will be getting penetration. Neal, Raji, Jenkins mainly. I wouldn't be relying on Brad Jones or Poppinga. Zombo might get a little pressure, but I wouldn't count on it being consistent.
And put Bishop in the middle. Let Hawk be second string. If Bishop is capable of calling the defensive signals.
In fact, I'd even line Zombo up as a down lineman at defensive end. That's the position he played in college. He might be more effective in that position than as a 3-4 OLB.

"nerdmann" wrote:

Switching schemes is not a good idea in which i dont think we would ever do that for one game.We will play 3-4 the whole season even thoe we use 2-4-5 package a lot.To sum it up that will prob. never happen,just because matthews is hurt doesn't mean we switch schemes.

A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

14 years ago

[quote="nerdmann"]Bjack can catch, but not well enough to run screens. For that we need Starks or Porter.
As far as Clay, I would hold him out in preparation for the Queens game the following week. Make sure you have him for that game. Mike McCarthy's career will be over if he gets de-pantsed by Favre again this year.
So let Clay rest that hammy, and run a 4-3 for this week. It's our Dlinemen who will be getting penetration. Neal, Raji, Jenkins mainly. I wouldn't be relying on Brad Jones or Poppinga. Zombo might get a little pressure, but I wouldn't count on it being consistent.
And put Bishop in the middle. Let Hawk be second string. If Bishop is capable of calling the defensive signals.
In fact, I'd even line Zombo up as a down lineman at defensive end. That's the position he played in college. He might be more effective in that position than as a 3-4 OLB.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

If we want a pass rush, I would say 3-3-5. Shift Jenks outside, with Raji and Neal and Zombo/Jones. I think that would still get good pressure without blitzing

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

nerdmann
Premier Member

14 years ago

Bjack can catch, but not well enough to run screens. For that we need Starks or Porter.
As far as Clay, I would hold him out in preparation for the Queens game the following week. Make sure you have him for that game. Mike McCarthy's career will be over if he gets de-pantsed by Favre again this year.
So let Clay rest that hammy, and run a 4-3 for this week. It's our Dlinemen who will be getting penetration. Neal, Raji, Jenkins mainly. I wouldn't be relying on Brad Jones or Poppinga. Zombo might get a little pressure, but I wouldn't count on it being consistent.
And put Bishop in the middle. Let Hawk be second string. If Bishop is capable of calling the defensive signals.
In fact, I'd even line Zombo up as a down lineman at defensive end. That's the position he played in college. He might be more effective in that position than as a 3-4 OLB.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

"nerdmann" wrote:

I disagree. If anyone is willing to taylor his formations to his players, it's Capers. Hell, he's gone with ONE Dlinemen at times. LOL.
I'll tell you something else. We might be BETTER OFF if Flynn starts in place of Rodgers this week. I said that about Brad Jones last year when Kampy went down. I say it again.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Finley88Beast
Registered Topic Starter

14 years ago

Bjack can catch, but not well enough to run screens. For that we need Starks or Porter.
As far as Clay, I would hold him out in preparation for the Queens game the following week. Make sure you have him for that game. Mike McCarthy's career will be over if he gets de-pantsed by Favre again this year.
So let Clay rest that hammy, and run a 4-3 for this week. It's our Dlinemen who will be getting penetration. Neal, Raji, Jenkins mainly. I wouldn't be relying on Brad Jones or Poppinga. Zombo might get a little pressure, but I wouldn't count on it being consistent.
And put Bishop in the middle. Let Hawk be second string. If Bishop is capable of calling the defensive signals.
In fact, I'd even line Zombo up as a down lineman at defensive end. That's the position he played in college. He might be more effective in that position than as a 3-4 OLB.

"nerdmann" wrote:

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

"nerdmann" wrote:

Well you sounded like we should change the scheme completely i got misleaded a little bit.But basicly the phyco package is a sub package and not a scheme idk if capers will use a 4-3 defense just because matthews cant go or not.But if we use a 3-4 i say still use it what will a 4-3 defense do better than a 3-4?I mean we dont got the personal anymore that can rush like that.4-3 is a bad D imo i hate it i love the 3-4 its unpredictable plus we barley used the 3-4 this year we play alot of 2-4-5.I dont like the idea is what im trying to say.

"taylor his formations to his players" is what you said,Well are personal this time won't fit a 4-3 better than a 3-4 ik he does taylor his formations to the personal lets see what he does is we have athletic LB's and a big guy in jenkins thats a pass rusher so we took that and made it the phyco.Now lets look at if we went for some 4-3 packages jenkins,raji,?,neal not gonna work.Don't like it..Even if we put zombo as a Defensive end it would leave less depth at OLB.I think it would make it confusing and it would not work out well.I mean Ik what your trying to say but i dont think that will happen when matthews may play or he misses a week he is not the defense and if he's out we dont need a 4-3 more so than a 3-4.

A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (1h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (1h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (1h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (1h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (2h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (2h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (2h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (3h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (3h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (3h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (6h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (13h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (14h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (20h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (20h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (22h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS