RashaanSalaami
14 years ago
Posted this over on another forum, but here it is for you guys!

Welcome to Week 1's Results of my review of the game with an emphasis on the defensive secondary. I charted the results of the game, while hopefully doing a slightly better job than PFF. Instead of assigning catches to the nearest defender, I attempted to do a better job of trying to figure out responsibilities and put the blame on the defender that was most responsible for the catch. In some instances, if I really can't figure it out, I'll throw it into the "Hole in a Zone/Screen" category and describe the play. I don't claim 100% accuracy, but hope to do a good enough job where the information here is relevant. Other than that, I hope you enjoy this weekly piece, so long as I have access to a replay of the game. I will try to get it up before the "next" week's game if possible.

Week 1 @ Philadelphia Eagles:

UserPostedImage

The QB Rating and Completion Percent may point to Charles Woodson, but Tramon Williams was our best Cover Corner in Week One. He played a spectacular game at LCB for virtually the whole game, which allowed Woodson to move inside and get physical with receivers in the slot, namely Avant. Woodson's numbers probably reflect a better game than he actually had, with Vick missing at least a pass or two under his watch that should have been completions with an accurate QB. Tramon was draped on his receiver in man coverage and quickly found his assignments in zone coverage. He made several highlight plays on the ball and was unfortunate to not come down with at least one.

Though the QB rating is the worst possible against Sam Shields, he actually played an outstanding first game, given his situation. With only 1 year of CB experience under his belt, Shields started his career as a starter for a largely Nickel defense. To be targeted only twice, while going up against Maclin and DeSean Jackson for most of the game is a very good result, even if the two times he was targeted ended up in a TD and a first down (which a tough completion in his zone).

Our safeties played one heck of a game. I didn't see too much of them in the picture and given the explosiveness of the opposing offense, that's a damn good result.

Chillar was our most targeted on the day and also let up the most completions, but that's more the nature of the offense and defense on the field. The Eagles were relegated to attacking us solely with short routes in the middle of the field. Our DBs were taking away too much on the outside, so most of their receivers made catches in the middle of the field. Chillar was almost always a sure tackle soon after the catch.

Brad Jones was victimized on the 27 yard pass to Celek up the seam. He was also the OLB on the screen side, which I officially didn't chalk up to his credit. The play was a 3 man rush while dropping 8 deep into coverage. Seemed like they were playing for a deeper pass, but our DL bit right into the trap, leaving a trio of blockers in front of Jones who was already 10 yards downfield at the time of the pass.

All in all, the Eagles took advantage of deep safeties, finding their long completions in front of them, while eating up the defense on short crossing routes and slants. It's tough to fault the pass D for the near comeback in Week 1. It was Vick's legs and a couple screen passes that did most of the damage on offense.


(Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to add, within reason.)
blank
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago
This is the best post, to date, on this forum - and I cannot compliment your post higher than that. Outstanding effort and great analysis. Excellent work chrisbozz. +2

I have to disagree with one thing: I do not feel the Eagles tried to work the Sam Shields predicament to their favor all that much: they did not try to isolate him a whole lot (Packers usually had Burnett over top of him) and then on the TD Shields gave up, we saw the risk involved with Shields 1-on-1 because he got beat wicked. While the sample size on Shileds is not large enough, it does show a need to be concerned at our nickel position (should opposing defenses try to exploit it).

This next bit though, I do not feel is fair enough to ask of you but I would be very intrigued to get an analysis of the snap breakdowns, so we could get some idea of what Dom is thinking and how he is trying to manage having two rookies (Shields and Burnett) take some major responsibilities in our D (is he asking Collins to stay in the box more, blitzing and calling more bump-and-run, pass-rushing ILBs more - observations of this nature). However, as I said above it is very unfair to ask you to do this, and beyond providing some more context to your work it would not make a huge difference in the reliability of your stats / analysis (assuming your stats are accurate). I do not really have any suggestion for the direction I think you want to take your work in, but one interesting observation might be to catalog the snaps each player plays (or the players you catalog). Again, this may be asking too much of you, but since you asked for suggestions I wanted to try and give you one idea rather than none at all. I think your work is fantastic in its current format as it is. Maybe you might want to consider having a spreadsheet tallying the stats as the season progresses, in addition to week-to-week stats (if you do not plan to do this already).

I would like to add one more thing: I hope that you (or anyone else) do (does) NOT compare your work to that of PFF. You do not have their resources and experience to churn out metrics for our team like they do. It would be a big disservice to compare your work to theirs; their work is outstanding, but so is yours considering (I assume) you are not an "expert" and you probably have a life outside of doing this type of work.

Once again, excellent work. The fact that you point out we had deep safties makes me wonder to what extent Vick was able to run on us as a result of us trying to take the pass away first.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
yooperfan
14 years ago
Excellent piece of work. Thanks for your time and effort. +2
RashaanSalaami
14 years ago

This is the best post, to date, on this forum - and I cannot compliment your post higher than that. Outstanding effort and great analysis. Excellent work chrisbozz. +2

I have to disagree with one thing: I do not feel the Eagles tried to work the Sam Shields predicament to their favor all that much: they did not try to isolate him a whole lot (Packers usually had Burnett over top of him) and then on the TD Shields gave up, we saw the risk involved with Shields 1-on-1 because he got beat wicked. While the sample size on Shileds is not large enough, it does show a need to be concerned at our nickel position (should opposing defenses try to exploit it).

This next bit though, I do not feel is fair enough to ask of you but I would be very intrigued to get an analysis of the snap breakdowns, so we could get some idea of what Dom is thinking and how he is trying to manage having two rookies (Shields and Burnett) take some major responsibilities in our D (is he asking Collins to stay in the box more, blitzing and calling more bump-and-run, pass-rushing ILBs more - observations of this nature). However, as I said above it is very unfair to ask you to do this, and beyond providing some more context to your work it would not make a huge difference in the reliability of your stats / analysis (assuming your stats are accurate). I do not really have any suggestion for the direction I think you want to take your work in, but one interesting observation might be to catalog the snaps each player plays (or the players you catalog). Again, this may be asking too much of you, but since you asked for suggestions I wanted to try and give you one idea rather than none at all. I think your work is fantastic in its current format as it is. Maybe you might want to consider having a spreadsheet tallying the stats as the season progresses, in addition to week-to-week stats (if you do not plan to do this already).

I would like to add one more thing: I hope that you (or anyone else) do (does) NOT compare your work to that of PFF. You do not have their resources and experience to churn out metrics for our team like they do. It would be a big disservice to compare your work to theirs; their work is outstanding, but so is yours considering (I assume) you are not an "expert" and you probably have a life outside of doing this type of work.

Once again, excellent work. The fact that you point out we had deep safties makes me wonder to what extent Vick was able to run on us as a result of us trying to take the pass away first.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Great suggestions, I'll definitely see what I can do to try and incorporate one of your ideas. You're definitely making me work though! :icon_smile:

I do plan on keeping the yearly numbers in addition to the weekly ones.

Considering PFF plans on getting people to pay for their services, I'll try to bring you a portion of what they offer, but free.

Glad to see you enjoyed it! I'll try to get the Buffalo game done as soon as I can.
blank
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Rude!
beast (2h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (6h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (8h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (10h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.