Sorry my purple friends.. but yes that was a dose of pure joy.. the single play. If it is any comfort, we can relate to the pain two years removed.
"pack93z" wrote:
I have no problem with your post, except for this last comment..
Honestly, that's an insult to us Viking backers. Trying to relate to the pain we've been through?! Impossible! So don't try.
4 Super Bowls.
5 NFC Championship games.
Countless playoff games.
Each and every one of them ended in getting our hopes up, only to have the rug being pulled out from underneath us.
Take the pain you guys felt 2 years ago, and multiply it by at least 9. Then you can relate.
=)
"Formo" wrote:
It really isn't an insult when you think in these terms... which is what has always laid in my craw a bit.
We had a top 10 all time QB (by many different types of listings) for a decade and a half, had one of the best cumulative records in the 90's and we only won the super bowl once.
Is that really in the same class as your trials as a fan? Probably not.. but more so than not, you have always been short on consistency at QB year after year holding your franchise somewhat hostage.
A great year and there by the likes of Johnson, Culpepper, and Cunningham.. but they never we able to string a few years together to really have a open window at the big game. So you were somewhat limited to single shots at the big dance.
We on the other hand didn't have that excuse.. we had stability at QB, even though the position is over valued, we should have made the big dance more than two times in Brett's era.. and that is a bitter pill all of its own.
Sorry.. didn't mean to insult, but believe me when I say expectations verse production has fallen short over Brett's GB career.
Call it sour grapes.. probably.. but we had more than enough chances to get it done only to see it go up in INT flames.
"pack93z" wrote: