GermanGilbert
15 years ago

I'm not rooting against Favre. I'm rooting against the Vikings. It just so happens he's their starting quarterback.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



nuff said, +1
blank
zombieslayer
15 years ago

We have tradition and order around here. The Vikings not winning in the SB is a tradition that should be kept. (The Vikings not making the SB even better.)

"wpr" wrote:



Well, the Vikings letting their fans down in their official Viking tradition. Cheer loudly in their stupid dome, blow that stupid horn, get their fans all excited, then lose in the Playoffs. I'd be an alcoholic if I were a Vikings fan.

You just gotta love their playoff history.

4 times losing Super Bowls
4 times losing the Championship Game.
12 times losing in the Division round
5 times losing the Wild-card game

Kind of makes me want them to get past their division opponent just to give their fans one more week of false hope. :walk:
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
isocleas2
15 years ago
Voted losing to the vikings although I didn't see the "vikings win it all" option. Probably would have gone with that one.

The Cardinals are the defending NFC champions. When their offense is going they are as unstoppable as any team, and their d has improved too. Losing to them wouldn't be the end of the world.
vikesrule
15 years ago

...You just gotta love their playoff history.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Yo ZS, does that include January 9th, 2005? :icon_smile:
dfosterf
15 years ago

...You just gotta love their playoff history.

"vikesrule" wrote:



Yo ZS, does that include January 9th, 2005? :icon_smile:

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Typical Vikings fan. Always dragging up some piece of ancient history in order to try and somehow bolster their arguments. :danceme:
vikesrule
15 years ago

...You just gotta love their playoff history.

"dfosterf" wrote:



Yo ZS, does that include January 9th, 2005? :icon_smile:

"vikesrule" wrote:



Typical Vikings fan. Always dragging up some piece of ancient history in order to try and somehow bolster their arguments. :danceme:

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Good morning to you too Dave.

But cheer up my delusional cheesehead (redundant, I know) amigo.
For after this Sunday, the only NFCN team that will be left in the playoffs will be the Minnesota Vikings, and this part of the Vikings/Packers discussion will be a moot point! :pottytrain1:
dfosterf
15 years ago

...You just gotta love their playoff history.

"vikesrule" wrote:



Yo ZS, does that include January 9th, 2005? :icon_smile:

"dfosterf" wrote:



Typical Vikings fan. Always dragging up some piece of ancient history in order to try and somehow bolster their arguments. :danceme:

"vikesrule" wrote:



Good morning to you too Dave.

But cheer up my delusional cheesehead (redundant, I know) amigo.
For after this Sunday, the only NFCN team that will be left in the playoffs will be the Minnesota Vikings, and this part of the Vikings/Packers discussion will be a moot point! :pottytrain1:

"zombieslayer" wrote:



That beatdown the Cards put on the Vikes in week 13 is still painful, I would imagine. Doesn't fit with subsequent events- Cards/Vikes/Pack-wise, to a queen fan, anyway.

I understand why you have such an incredible need for the Cards to take out the Pack. Getting your asses handed to you by the Bares, pinning your hopes on a concept that your team is ready because they supposedly "righted the ship" against a Giants team that so obviously totally mailed it in... These things must weigh on you.

Clinging to the last vestiges of a theory that the Pack is who you thought they were, or for that matter, the Vikes are as well...all due to some minor slip-ups during the early part of the regular season by Green Bay.

You could be right...we might be done after this weekend. Shit happens in the playoffs. If you are not, prepare for a world-class ass-whipping. Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Foster! I only hope we are afforded the chance to destroy the Vikes and all of their fan's illusions before someone like the 'Boys beat us to the opportunity to send them back into the back-waters of obscurity, where they rightfully live and dwell, when not re-emerging onto our consciousness due to yet another character failing by yet another member of their so-called "team"... I prefer to think of them as an assemblage of mercenaries attempting to "resurrect" some measure of pride in a state that never truly had any.

Whatever accomplishments they have to date also have a nice big fat asterisk attached, thanks to the continued violation of league rules regarding the Williams', and were they to luck into any further accomplishments, that asterisk remains prominent to all fans outside the state of Minnesota.

I will rescind this perspective as soon as the queens voluntarily forfeit 4 games. :thumbleft:

Cheaters should not prosper.

Losing to the Vikings would bother me, yes. (To the thread, lol, and there is a small measure of tongue-in-cheek in this post)



:horse:
Cheesey
15 years ago

Wow....how depressing would that be if the Packers lost to the
Vikings in the playoffs, and then those "purple horn-blowing cunts" went on to win the Superbowl! ::wink:

Not to mention that if the Vikings win the Superbowl, Cheesey has promised to run down the streets in nothing but his underwear!

<shudder....delete that last image>

"vikesrule" wrote:


Yeah....ol' "Vikey Poo" would be the first one outside my place with his video camera in hand, so he could watch me over and over and over!!! :thumbright:
UserPostedImage
vikesrule
15 years ago

...You just gotta love their playoff history.

"dfosterf" wrote:



Yo ZS, does that include January 9th, 2005? :icon_smile:

"vikesrule" wrote:



Typical Vikings fan. Always dragging up some piece of ancient history in order to try and somehow bolster their arguments. :danceme:

"dfosterf" wrote:



Good morning to you too Dave.

But cheer up my delusional cheesehead (redundant, I know) amigo.
For after this Sunday, the only NFCN team that will be left in the playoffs will be the Minnesota Vikings, and this part of the Vikings/Packers discussion will be a moot point! :pottytrain1:

"vikesrule" wrote:





That beatdown the Cards put on the Vikes in week 13 is still painful, I would imagine. Doesn't fit with subsequent events- Cards/Vikes/Pack-wise, to a queen fan, anyway.

I understand why you have such an incredible need for the Cards to take out the Pack. Getting your asses handed to you by the Bares, pinning your hopes on a concept that your team is ready because they supposedly "righted the ship" against a Giants team that so obviously totally mailed it in... These things must weigh on you.

Clinging to the last vestiges of a theory that the Pack is who you thought they were, or for that matter, the Vikes are as well...all due to some minor slip-ups during the early part of the regular season by Green Bay.

You could be right...we might be done after this weekend. Shit happens in the playoffs. If you are not, prepare for a world-class ass-whipping. Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Foster! I only hope we are afforded the chance to destroy the Vikes and all of their fan's illusions before someone like the 'Boys beat us to the opportunity to send them back into the back-waters of obscurity, where they rightfully live and dwell, when not re-emerging onto our consciousness due to yet another character failing by yet another member of their so-called "team"... I prefer to think of them as an assemblage of mercenaries attempting to "resurrect" some measure of pride in a state that never truly had any.

Whatever accomplishments they have to date also have a nice big fat asterisk attached, thanks to the continued violation of league rules regarding the Williams', and were they to luck into any further accomplishments, that asterisk remains prominent to all fans outside the state of Minnesota.

I will rescind this perspective as soon as the queens voluntarily forfeit 4 games. :thumbleft:

Cheaters should not prosper.

Losing to the Vikings would bother me, yes. (To the thread, lol, and there is a small measure of tongue-in-cheek in this post)

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Whoa...rabble, rabble, rabble.
Suffering from a little verbal diarrhea this morning, huh Dave?

I'm sensing a touch of animosity here foster-son, a sure sign of a despondent, nay desperate mind.

But be of cheer my friend, for when the history of the 2009 Green Bay Packers is written, they will only be known as the NFC North 2nd place team...
...otherwise referred to as the 1st losers! :thumbright:

Bwaahaaa!
Silentio
15 years ago
One and done sucks. Losing to the Vikings would hurt but it would mean that we win at least one game, if not too. But I voted for the Vikings winning the SB. That would just be terrible.
blank
Fan Shout
dfosterf (now) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (2m) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (7h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (8h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (9h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (9h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (11h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
15m / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.