get_louder_at_lambeau
15 years ago

we're 10-5 not 11-5.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:


As far as 11-5, give it time. :thumbleft:

"mi_keys" wrote:



OK, NOW we're 11-5.
http://packersnews.net 
mi_keys
15 years ago

we're 10-5 not 11-5.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:


As far as 11-5, give it time. :thumbleft:

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



OK, NOW we're 11-5.

"mi_keys" wrote:



hell yeah!
Born and bred a cheesehead
get_louder_at_lambeau
15 years ago
So they showed this during the game-

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers. Obviously the skill players get the lion's share of the credit for that, but that just does not happen if the OL is as bad as many think they are/were this year.

The OL is plenty good enough to win in the playoffs, as evidenced by the consistent production of the offense all year long. If our defense can keep the opposition from scoring 30 points or more, the Packers have a great shot at winning any game.
http://packersnews.net 
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Four teams scored 30 points or more on our defense this year (Minnesota did it twice). The Packers went 0-5 in these games. That represents every single loss for the season.

So yes, 30 points seems to be an important threshold.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
15 years ago

So they showed this during the game-

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers. Obviously the skill players get the lion's share of the credit for that, but that just does not happen if the OL is as bad as many think they are/were this year.

The OL is plenty good enough to win in the playoffs, as evidenced by the consistent production of the offense all year long. If our defense can keep the opposition from scoring 30 points or more, the Packers have a great shot at winning any game.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



You can't deny that they were terrible until Tauscher was able to come back as a starter.
warhawk
15 years ago

So they showed this during the game-

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers. Obviously the skill players get the lion's share of the credit for that, but that just does not happen if the OL is as bad as many think they are/were this year.

The OL is plenty good enough to win in the playoffs, as evidenced by the consistent production of the offense all year long. If our defense can keep the opposition from scoring 30 points or more, the Packers have a great shot at winning any game.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



You missed the fact that the record was for TWO YEARS IN A ROW.

'08 and '09 the Packers had a 4000+ QB, 1000+ RB, and two 1000+ WR's.
"The train is leaving the station."
get_louder_at_lambeau
15 years ago

So they showed this during the game-

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers. Obviously the skill players get the lion's share of the credit for that, but that just does not happen if the OL is as bad as many think they are/were this year.

The OL is plenty good enough to win in the playoffs, as evidenced by the consistent production of the offense all year long. If our defense can keep the opposition from scoring 30 points or more, the Packers have a great shot at winning any game.

"yooperfan" wrote:



You can't deny that they were terrible until Tauscher was able to come back as a starter.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



I deny that they were as bad as advertised. I think they were performing poorly, and were the weakest link in a relatively strong chain, and that gets exaggerated into "OMG most extra super worstest OL ever". Yes, I know they gave up a ton of sacks, but that was partially on the QB too, and the offense was still very productive, averaging 27 points in the 7 games before Tausher took his first snap against Tampa Bay. So yes, I deny that they were terrible. I'd go with "below average".
http://packersnews.net 
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



They're the first team in NFL history two accomplish this feat two years in a row.
UserPostedImage
get_louder_at_lambeau
15 years ago

So they showed this during the game-

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers. Obviously the skill players get the lion's share of the credit for that, but that just does not happen if the OL is as bad as many think they are/were this year.

The OL is plenty good enough to win in the playoffs, as evidenced by the consistent production of the offense all year long. If our defense can keep the opposition from scoring 30 points or more, the Packers have a great shot at winning any game.

"warhawk" wrote:



You missed the fact that the record was for TWO YEARS IN A ROW.

'08 and '09 the Packers had a 4000+ QB, 1000+ RB, and two 1000+ WR's.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



Yep. I missed that. I was watching in a bar with all the games on, lotsa beer and no audio volume for the Packer game.

Two years in a row, so even better, right? This OL has been criticized strongly both years.
http://packersnews.net 
zombieslayer
15 years ago
It just amazes me how productive this O is despite our OL being so bad.

So...

We are no longer alone at #1 in sacks allowed. Pitts is tied with us. And they won the SB last year with that crappy OL.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. šŸ‡¹šŸ‡¹ šŸ‡²šŸ‡² šŸ‡¦šŸ‡·
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (5m) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
    dfosterf (34m) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
    dfosterf (50m) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
    dfosterf (56m) : *Friday*
    dfosterf (59m) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
    dfosterf (1h) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
    dfosterf (1h) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
    dfosterf (1h) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
    Zero2Cool (1h) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
    dfosterf (1h) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
    dfosterf (1h) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
    beast (1h) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
    beast (1h) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
    beast (1h) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
    beast (1h) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
    dfosterf (2h) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
    dfosterf (2h) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
    dfosterf (2h) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
    dfosterf (2h) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
    beast (8h) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: ā€œA great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.ā€
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates ā€œmany Packers gamesā€ being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
    Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if heā€™s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
    Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgersā€™s first pass of first team period was picked off
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Oh, it's toe injury
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    3m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.