get_louder_at_lambeau
15 years ago

we're 10-5 not 11-5.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:


As far as 11-5, give it time. :thumbleft:

"mi_keys" wrote:



OK, NOW we're 11-5.
http://packersnews.net 
mi_keys
15 years ago

we're 10-5 not 11-5.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:


As far as 11-5, give it time. :thumbleft:

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



OK, NOW we're 11-5.

"mi_keys" wrote:



hell yeah!
Born and bred a cheesehead
get_louder_at_lambeau
15 years ago
So they showed this during the game-

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers. Obviously the skill players get the lion's share of the credit for that, but that just does not happen if the OL is as bad as many think they are/were this year.

The OL is plenty good enough to win in the playoffs, as evidenced by the consistent production of the offense all year long. If our defense can keep the opposition from scoring 30 points or more, the Packers have a great shot at winning any game.
http://packersnews.net 
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Four teams scored 30 points or more on our defense this year (Minnesota did it twice). The Packers went 0-5 in these games. That represents every single loss for the season.

So yes, 30 points seems to be an important threshold.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
15 years ago

So they showed this during the game-

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers. Obviously the skill players get the lion's share of the credit for that, but that just does not happen if the OL is as bad as many think they are/were this year.

The OL is plenty good enough to win in the playoffs, as evidenced by the consistent production of the offense all year long. If our defense can keep the opposition from scoring 30 points or more, the Packers have a great shot at winning any game.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



You can't deny that they were terrible until Tauscher was able to come back as a starter.
warhawk
15 years ago

So they showed this during the game-

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers. Obviously the skill players get the lion's share of the credit for that, but that just does not happen if the OL is as bad as many think they are/were this year.

The OL is plenty good enough to win in the playoffs, as evidenced by the consistent production of the offense all year long. If our defense can keep the opposition from scoring 30 points or more, the Packers have a great shot at winning any game.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



You missed the fact that the record was for TWO YEARS IN A ROW.

'08 and '09 the Packers had a 4000+ QB, 1000+ RB, and two 1000+ WR's.
"The train is leaving the station."
get_louder_at_lambeau
15 years ago

So they showed this during the game-

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers. Obviously the skill players get the lion's share of the credit for that, but that just does not happen if the OL is as bad as many think they are/were this year.

The OL is plenty good enough to win in the playoffs, as evidenced by the consistent production of the offense all year long. If our defense can keep the opposition from scoring 30 points or more, the Packers have a great shot at winning any game.

"yooperfan" wrote:



You can't deny that they were terrible until Tauscher was able to come back as a starter.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



I deny that they were as bad as advertised. I think they were performing poorly, and were the weakest link in a relatively strong chain, and that gets exaggerated into "OMG most extra super worstest OL ever". Yes, I know they gave up a ton of sacks, but that was partially on the QB too, and the offense was still very productive, averaging 27 points in the 7 games before Tausher took his first snap against Tampa Bay. So yes, I deny that they were terrible. I'd go with "below average".
http://packersnews.net 
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



They're the first team in NFL history two accomplish this feat two years in a row.
UserPostedImage
get_louder_at_lambeau
15 years ago

So they showed this during the game-

The 2009 Packers are the 2nd team in the history of the NFL to have a 4000 passer, a 1200 yard rusher, and two 1000 receivers. Obviously the skill players get the lion's share of the credit for that, but that just does not happen if the OL is as bad as many think they are/were this year.

The OL is plenty good enough to win in the playoffs, as evidenced by the consistent production of the offense all year long. If our defense can keep the opposition from scoring 30 points or more, the Packers have a great shot at winning any game.

"warhawk" wrote:



You missed the fact that the record was for TWO YEARS IN A ROW.

'08 and '09 the Packers had a 4000+ QB, 1000+ RB, and two 1000+ WR's.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



Yep. I missed that. I was watching in a bar with all the games on, lotsa beer and no audio volume for the Packer game.

Two years in a row, so even better, right? This OL has been criticized strongly both years.
http://packersnews.net 
zombieslayer
15 years ago
It just amazes me how productive this O is despite our OL being so bad.

So...

We are no longer alone at #1 in sacks allowed. Pitts is tied with us. And they won the SB last year with that crappy OL.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (2h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (6h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (6h) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (7h) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (7h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (7h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (7h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (7h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (7h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (7h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (7h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (7h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (8h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (8h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (8h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (8h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (10h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (10h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (10h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
    Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
    dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
    Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
    wpr (9-Apr) : yay
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
    Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
    Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
    Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
    Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    10 - 22
    Recent Topics
    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

    28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

    25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.