Pack93z
15 years ago
There was no major gaffs from him today.. sometimes you just gotta tip your hat to the opposition..

I don't think he is a front line player.. but I can't fault him for his play today.. other than the false start on special teams.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Yerko
15 years ago
Agreed z93. He looked fine and like someone said previously...like a tenth of a second behind. He did have a nice open field tackle.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
15 years ago


Jarret Bush had just as much to do with this win as anybody else on the team.

"Kyle" wrote:



Can't agree with that statement, sorry. Bush is a liability and needs to be gone.

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:



Who's gonna take his place? Right now, who on the roster is better? If that guy is there I am sure Mike McCarthy would have him playing.

IT'S A FU#$%#NG TEAM GAME!!! YOU WIN AS A TEAM, YOU LOSE AS A TEAM.

What if The Bears would have won today, and the winning score was the td Woodson gave up, would he be blamed 100% for the loss, would he all of a sudden be a liability?

Of course not, but because Jarrett Bush has been tagged by some on this forum as a guy who can't do anything right, the only time people talk about him is when he gets beat. Nothing is said about the 90% of the plays where he does his job.

Look back at this game and everyone should be real happy the defense played as well as they did, because the offense did not have a stellar game.

A winning team doesn't have a roster full of superstars. Usually there are a few exceptional players, then there are the rest of the guys who go out there and bust their asses and do whatever they can to get the team a win.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
coltonja
15 years ago
No, he is not learning on the run he has been with the team since Favre's worthless game against the Cowboys (what 3 years ago? same game Rodgers came in for us) and he was just as "solid" then.

He has not improved at all. Seriously solid coverage? Solid game? The guy he was supposively covering had 8 catches EIGHT CATCHES!! Going into that game this Bears player had 6 catches in his career!!!

Stop sticking up for this kid if any of us posted numbers like his at our jobs we would be fired. And you say we have to deal with him this year?!?!? Why? Put in Bell or Underwood, they can't do any worse.
Bush is lost out there. Sticking up for him does no good for anyone.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to pack93z for the sig!!!
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Woodson was covering the guy who had the eight catches and the TD was on Woodson too.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Post repeated. Sorry. The site screwed up.

"Greg C." wrote:

You double posted, and it's the sites fault? 🙂 lol

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



The site said I made an error by posting twice in a short time span, even though it was my first post in several hours. So I waited, then tried again, and it showed up twice.

Maybe I double-clicked on the SEND button or something. It's happened twice in the past week, though it had never happened before.

"Greg C." wrote:



I've seen that happen, if you click the Submit button twice. First click, post is sent to the db, second click, it checks for that post, find its, returns the error message.

I just don't think one should blame the site for doing as it's coded to do, not allow flooding. 🙂 (im bias, i know lol)
UserPostedImage
Lynn_Dickey
15 years ago
Sorry, I did not mean to pick on Bush. I just found it very interesting and fustrating to listen to an opposing team's opinion of us (well their anouncers anyways) and hear clearly where are weakness is. THere was something like 3 completions in a row where Bush was covering. Yes Woodson got burned, but he also made big plays. You are right though, cannot get rid of him until we know we have an improvement. Clearly that coaching staff knows there is a problem (re the secondary coaches comments from a week or 2 ago). If/when we play the vikings again (or saints) they will attack us here.
blank
Greg C.
15 years ago

If/when we play the vikings again (or saints) they will attack us here.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



The Cardinals could also kill our weakened secondary. It seemed like today Bush was playing the TE a lot and also playing near the line of scrimmage. This is what's best for him, due to his lack of ball skills.
blank
nerdmann
15 years ago

he does an adequate enough job (had a nice open field tackle), but he was never meant to be more than a special teamer. It's a shame we lost Blackmon and Lee so early.

"Scottish_Packer" wrote:




He's holding up far, far better than expected. After all, how many teams have an 8th DB who's that good?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
coltonja
15 years ago

Woodson was covering the guy who had the eight catches and the TD was on Woodson too.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Woodson covered him after he had already caught at least 5 balls.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to pack93z for the sig!!!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (22h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
46m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.