Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
You are an asshole, but you make me laugh.
15 years ago

You are an asshole, but you make me laugh.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



story of my life. 😉

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


dingus
15 years ago
That last exchange was comedy gold!
blank
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago

*avoids kick by angling slightly to the left, and gaining a few extra yards in the process*

"TwinkieGorilla" wrote:



+1 :onfloor:
evad04
15 years ago
There are some really great examples in highlight video of a fully functioning 3-4 defense. Baltimore's run offense could never get it going, and you can see why. Raji played a great game; the linebackers swarmed to the ball. Once the initial barrage of fat men engaged the o-line there'd be three or four guys coming up, cutting off an angle and making a play.

Rodgers ... what is there to say? We are indeed blessed to have a quarterback this good, this soon. While he won't do the same things with his legs five years from now, if he still has that arm AND can make decisions a little faster (hard to believe he won't seeing as how that's the usual progression for good quarterbacks) then it's scary to think about how his career projects.

As always, thanks for the highlight Zero. I was smiling throughout that entire clip.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

On the Rodgers run, I'm only relating what I saw in the rear-angle replay. Obviously, I didn't get to see the game, so I couldn't see the entire field. There was a pretty big hole up the middle, but that doesn't mean Rodgers could have outrun pursuit from the periphery.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



In the first post of this thread, there's a video that contains two angles of the play. That's where I based my reply on. You can clearly see there was no chance he could have outrun the four defenders as they had positioned themselves well.

Edit, watched the angles again. There's absolutely no way whatsoever that if Rodgers cut left would he have scored. Once he cuts left, there's a defender who is barely in the screen who would have got him, plus there was two defenders in front of him.

I tried to see the potential touchdown, but there just is none. Anyone who wants to argue, you're arguing for the sake of arguing. Watch the play in slow motion, just 1/2 speed and you'll see it too.
15 years ago
I don't understand why there is an argument over whether a 25 yard run down the middle of the field by our franchise QB on 2nd and 17 should have been 30 yards... Maybe I'm missing something here?
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
What the hell. I stated that I was relating a subjective opinion, I stated the limits of my opinion, I even stated I think he made the right decision. Where is the argument here?
15 years ago
I don't know. This thread is confusing the shit out of me.
15 years ago
up left a b a up up down a b b left right

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Fan Shout
dfosterf (2h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (2h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (2h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (9h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (11h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (11h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (12h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (13h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.