Yeah, right Cheesey...
(and Favre shouldn't be a first ballot HOF'er when he retires either, right?)
I'm sure you can think up alot of useless excuses and "reasons" that you think pose as facts to deny him.
Like, "He threw alot of interceptions". "He only won 1 SB"...and "He hasn't won another in 10 years"..
:lol:
"dingus" wrote:
Yeah right Roddyboy
#1 all time in interceptions (getting up there on the fumbles lost as well).
You Also forgot #1 in TD's, Yardage, etc, etc...DingusTrent Dilfer has as many SB rings.
Dan Marino has 0 SB rings as does Aaron Rodgers. Elway only got his because of Terrell Davis. I love these non-points you people make out of context. 3-7 in the playoffs since 1998.
You also somehow conveniently forgot 14-4 last year, MVP runner up to Brady, over 4,000 passing, over 20 TD's. And lest we not forget, Ray Rhodes and Mike Sherman. But I guess you are a Rhodes and Sherman fan, since you don't think they are handicaps that contributed greatly to theat record. eh?39 in a couple of weeks.
Big deal....You people have been bitching about his age for 5 years now. What's the point. (See last year's statistics above)Those are all undeniable facts RB.
But had your idol come back for 1 more year we would be assured that championship.
14-3 last year. Led team to NFC Championship game. Do I keep having to remind you? At this point in the season the GBP are far from being a SB contender, with or without Lord Favre Almighty.
Why would you say that? Last year they made it to the NFC Championship Game. Lord Ted, whom you all seem to think is bigger than the GB Packer organization is supposed to IMPROVE the team, not take a step backwards. Oh...that's right. He promoted Rodgers over Favre....that's why we're no where near the SB this year. Is that your point?It's the 4th week of a 17 week season, We are playing a conference team that beat a division foe last week. Our secondary has had the shit kicked out of it and I still expect us to win on Sunday.
I love the Green Bay Packers!
You don't.
I have faith in Aaron Rodgers Mike McCarthy and Ted Thompson .
You don't.
We are all aware of these "undeniable facts".
Here's another undeniable fact. Ted Thompson is not "above" the Green Bay Packers. I think that some of you think that he is, or at least, equivalent to the GB Packers. I'm sorry to break it to some of you, but that's not how it works. He WORKS for the GB Packers. He is NOT the GB Packers. Get it straight, will you? Isn't it time to move on?
"Roddyboy" wrote: