The same gameplan is playing two much nickle coverage. Two Dline man rushing with 2 lbers. We needed to have the extra big body inside.
"dd80forever" wrote:
Last time the emphasis was on stopping Peterson.
Clearly the Nickel package was geared towards countering the Vikings pass offense.
Big Okie is different from the Nickle.
"doddpower" wrote:
We didn't and do not win the majority of matchups due to a lack of talent not the gameplan, which is sometimes screwy as well.
"dd80forever" wrote:
I just don't understand the talent argument though. I think we have more then enough talent to have a top 10 + defense. Of course we have a few weak spots, but what D doesn't? Just look at Denver and the Saints. You can't tell me we don't at least have as much talent on D as those teams, if not more. Then how come they are having so much success and we are not? How about the Titans D this year? Surely Haynesworth wasn't responsible for their entire D collapsing this year?
It has to be coaching.
"all_about_da_packers" wrote:
I don't think there is as much Talent as you think.
Woodson is the best player on this defense. After that Harris is overrated these days. Hawk, Barnett, Chillar and Poppinga are average. Kampman is out of position, though he did get to rush more with his hand down against the Vikes. Collins is overrated by Packer fans, Bigby flat out stinks. The D-Line is again average and there is NO DEPTH whatsoever.
Like Jennings, you overhype guys at times. Some good players but nothing that the 85 Bears are going to be threatened by.
"PackFanWithTwins" wrote: