wils0646
15 years ago
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/65706132.html 

Green Bay There's no disputing it, the Green Bay Packers are the worst team in the league when it comes to penalties.

They are tied with the Buffalo Bills at the bottom with an average of 8.6 penalties per game. The Packers are all by themselves in yards (71.8).

They also happen to be 3-2 and would be in the playoffs if they started today.

Do the Packers need to clean up their sloppy play? Yes. Are they going to make the playoffs if they finish their current pace of 136 penalties for 1,149 yards? Probably not.

But here's the thing about penalties. Sure, it makes great talk-radio fodder. But the truth is, penalties don't matter as long as you are solid in other areas, namely protecting the quarterback and taking care of the ball.

And you don't need to go back very far back in Packers history for proof.

The Packers' last two NFC North division titles came in 2004 and '07. Those teams stand fourth and fifth, respectively, for most penalties in a season (116 and 113) in team history.

Brett Favre was sacked 14 times total in '04 and 19 in '07.

Aaron Rodgers has been dropped 25 times in five games.

The numbers also show the Packers are capable of doing damage if they cut down on the sacks.

The Packers average 2.13 points per drive this season when you eliminate run-out-the-clock scenarios.

When they don't have a sack or penalty on a drive, the Packers average 3.18 points. For comparison, the New Orleans Saints, with the NFL's top offense, average 3.84. The third-ranked Indianapolis Colts average 2.7.

When the Packers have a penalty on a drive, their average slips to 2.07. When they have a sack, it falls off a cliff to 0.75.

So basically, if the Packers cut back a little on the penalties and greatly improve on the offensive line they should be fine.

Want further proof of penalties' nominal effect on a team's success?

Of the 20 teams to advance to the league title games the previous five seasons, five (25%) finished in the top seven for penalties, including the Arizona Cardinals (fifth) and Baltimore Ravens (seventh) last year. The teams allowed 28 and 33 sacks, respectively.

And of the four most penalized teams in league history, none finished worse than 7-9. The 1989 Houston Oilers, who are fifth with 149 penalties, made the playoffs at 9-7.

The 1998 Kansas City Chiefs still rank as the most penalized in NFL history with 158 fouls and 1,304 yards. The quarterbacks coach on Marty Schottenheimer's staff was a mustachioed fellow by the name of Michael John McCarthy.

"It's 11 years ago," McCarthy said. "I don't think it has anything to do with what's going on here. It's a different team. I think it's a stretch (to draw any conclusion). I'll say this, Marty Schottenheimer won over 200 football games in the National Football League."

Schottenheimer also fielded some highly aggressive teams, probably because they had to go blow-for-blow in the AFC West with the Los Angeles Raiders, who led the league in penalties just about every year during that stretch.

McCarthy was on Schottenheimer's staff from 1993-'98 with the Chiefs. They ranked in the top four in penalties five times in that span and seventh once. The Chiefs also went 13-3 twice, advanced to the AFC championship at 11-5 and had just one losing record, in '98.

After that season, Schottenheimer resigned.

McCarthy still said he thinks penalties are important.

"Well, penalties are a negative," McCarthy said. "I think the way you approach them is no different than other things. I mean, pre-snap penalties, there's no excuse for them. I think anybody in football would say that. And that's really the thing we need to get rid of.

"We had five in one game. That's why our numbers are blown out of proportion after five games. We address it, we practice it and we train it. But we're creating a competitive, aggressive culture so there's some times where we may cross the line, and those are the things we work on every day. That's football."

In their 2007 Pro Football Prospectus, Aaron Schatz and Bill Barnwell from footballoutsiders.com studied penalties from 2002-'06. They found there was "almost zero" correlation between record and defensive or special-team penalties. There was, however, a much stronger correlation with offensive penalties.

And in that respect, the Packers are still doing well, even after Sunday's display against the Detroit Lions when they had six offensive infractions. It brought their total to 14, which is one more than the Colts (13) and fewer than the Saints (16).


The Packers do as much, maybe more, to prevent penalties as other teams. They have local referees at every practice. They go over it in film study. McCarthy yanks players when they commit an infraction in practice. Yes, he doesn't get red in the face as Mike Holmgren used to.

McCarthy could decide to have his players run laps after penalties, which is what Cleveland Browns coach Eric Mangini continues to do.

"Last year at this time, we were 32nd in the league in penalties," Mangini said. "This year, we're third. That's progress."

The Browns finished 4-12 last year.

They are 1-5 entering Sunday's game against the Green Bay Packers.


The Pack Will Be Back.
obi1
15 years ago
Good article. Thus the Packer Oline shuffle. I don't think he wrote anything the bosses on the team didn't know but I think it adds fuel to the fodder that our Oline is in need of work.

It seems that our oline offers the double whammy as it is penalty AND sack prone...

I await the time when Rodgers gets the time to throw... Hopefully right soon!
blank
wils0646
15 years ago
Seriously, even if we just cut our sack totals to 2 or 3 per game, we'd be scoring more and obviously winning more.

An 80 sack pace is ridiculous and hurting our team more than anything.
The Pack Will Be Back.
Pack93z
15 years ago
Hmm and people wonder why we are hammering the oline topic over and over.. Sacks don't even tell the whole "pressure" story and its impact.

BTW.. I don't discount the penalties as much as the article... but I will buy into the importance of offensive penalties over defensive.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Porforis
15 years ago
This article isn't really news. Yes, giving up sacks is going to hurt more than a false start or holding penalty because...

1. You'll lose just as many yards, or more, as well as lose a down
2. Your QB will get banged up
3. Large number of sacks reflects poorly on the O line and QB, which snowball into larger issues

Kind of a "duh" article for me. Yes, there's more important things to worry about. Yes, the penalties need to be cleaned up.
bozz_2006
15 years ago
So all they have to do is cut down on all the penalties and greatly improve their offensive line play? No problem! lol.

I like the stats in the article though.
UserPostedImage
matteogb4
15 years ago
i dont care...stop the penalites either way....


...and stop allowing sakcs...

that means playoff almost for sure
blank
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
Penalties have a habit of creating more penalties. The more desperate the team gets, the more they will create. Outside of Clifton, I was fairly happy with penalties besides ST last game. Throw out the good Driver and Colledge flags, and there were 3 penalties on the offense and defense. ST is another story.

I hope Lang plays well and removes any consideration of Chad returning to the starting lineup. We can have sacks now and then, those coverage sacks that happen. It is the quick sacks that are killers. There should never be pressure on a 3 step drop, and as MM said during his show. There should never be a LBer coming through like they did last game. Mental mistakes we can fix, technique we can coach.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
wils0646
15 years ago
Did you guys realize that defensive/special teams penalties don't hurt as much as people think? That's one of our main "problems", but statistics show that there is no correlation between that and losing games. We are lower in the league in offensive penalties, which are more detrimental to the team's success. I just like this article because it shows that there is really only one thing (albeit a huge one) to fix our team.

A little optimism I guess.
The Pack Will Be Back.
15 years ago

The Packers do as much, maybe more, to prevent penalties as other teams. They have local referees at every practice. They go over it in film study. McCarthy yanks players when they commit an infraction in practice. Yes, he doesn't get red in the face as Mike Holmgren used to.



That was my favorite part of the article.

This is sort of where i was going with my thread on how important 3rd down and medium or short is.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (1h) : RIP Junior Bridgeman. An excellent businessman and NBA er
Zero2Cool (3h) : It's better to have $17m to use on players who will be on the field. That's why trade/release is talked
Zero2Cool (3h) : post june is $7m cap hit with $17m saving
Zero2Cool (3h) : oops meant $10m cap hit
Zero2Cool (3h) : And pre june is $10m savings
Zero2Cool (3h) : Can't make him play.
dhazer (3h) : I am curious why the big need to release Jaire, we have 29 million cap space we arent spending and would only gain $6 million/ make him play
Zero2Cool (4h) : Joey Bosa signed with Bills?
dfosterf (4h) : What they are offering is a left over case of Leinies from the Chippewa Falls plant
Zero2Cool (4h) : 27, 59, 91, 129 gets you Jaire and our 3rd
Zero2Cool (4h) : they give us those five, or even first four, they can have Jaire.
Zero2Cool (4h) : 27, 59, 91, 129 and 136 are only ones worth having of theirs.
dfosterf (4h) : What they don't have is cap space, at least presently at 5.6 mil
dfosterf (5h) : Poor bastards only have 11
Zero2Cool (5h) : Ravens ain't got crap for picks.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Aaron Rodgers is choosing between Steelers and Giants. The Vikings are officially out on him, per RapSheet
dfosterf (5h) : Current cap space 29.6 million.
dfosterf (5h) : Hobbs 2025 cap hit just under 6 million. Banks 2025 cap hit just over 9 million
Mucky Tundra (12h) : beast, this is news to me! Tell me more about these, "draft picks." They seem mighty mysterious! 😉
beast (14h) : Yes, the Ravens have draft picks
dfosterf (15h) : Good luck to him.
Zero2Cool (16h) : Eric Stokes signs with Raiders
Martha Careful (17h) : Tyler Linderbaum C
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Cap space?
Zero2Cool (17h) : Do Ravens have anything we'd even entertain to have?
Mucky Tundra (19h) : I've seen trade ideas of Jaire going to the Ravens all offseason
beast (20h) : A probably false rumor is suggesting CB Jaire Alexander is being traded to the Ravens, again probably false
beast (20h) : Commanders might have a dominant offense the next 3 years at least
Zero2Cool (22h) : San Francisco 49ers announced they have released DL Leonard Floyd.
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Er getting traded twice like that
Mucky Tundra (11-Mar) : Huh, LT Laremy Tunsil traded from Houston to Washington. Never heard of a top OT getting traded in his career like that
Martha Careful (11-Mar) : Minnesota Vikings cornerback Byron Murphy Jr. is returning on a three-year, $66 million deal
Zero2Cool (11-Mar) : Damn
Martha Careful (11-Mar) : Saints are re-signing DE Chase Young to a three-year, $51 million deal worth up to $57 million.
Martha Careful (11-Mar) : 49ers releasing FB Juszcyk any interest?
Zero2Cool (11-Mar) : digits of four
Zero2Cool (11-Mar) : four digits
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : Eh, don't think so. better to split
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : on new site, would Fan Shout and GameDay Chat show same messages?
Mucky Tundra (10-Mar) : The Hall of Fame stuff probably came from a scout as Zero said; at this point though it's hard to see them moving ZT from RT
Mucky Tundra (10-Mar) : Regarding ZT at C, Gute had said he felt C was ZTs best position after he was drafted.
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : LB Oren Burks to sign a 2-year, $5M deal with the Bengals.
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : Based on how it was worded at the time, probably scout.
beast (10-Mar) : I don't think the media person ever told the public the source, but Gute or LaFleur did say they thought Tom has earned his spot at OT
beast (10-Mar) : I think it was supposedly unnamed Packers source
buckeyepackfan (10-Mar) : Was that Gute or Lefleur or someone else?
buckeyepackfan (10-Mar) : Zach Tom could be a really good guard, an all pro tackle, but probably be a HOF Center. Who said that?
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : It's March 10th. I don't think anything is done.
Martha Careful (10-Mar) : if we think CB is done, we have a poor roster
Mucky Tundra (10-Mar) : CB and OG in FA, narrows down the top of the draft board a little
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
50m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

11-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

4-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.