Not to sound like a jerk or something. But of course a sack is more damaging. It is just common sense. It is a loss of yards and down. A penalty is usually just a lost of yards.
This is close to saying an INT is more damaging than and incomplete. Or allowing a TD is more damaging than allowing a FG.
"wils0646" wrote:
I think the point I wanted to emphasize is the zero correlation between defensive/special teams penalties and success.
And yes, I think it is obvious that sacks impact the game more than penalties.
"PackFanWithTwins" wrote: