Rockmolder
15 years ago

I don't think the Packers brought Ahman back for the running game but for his blocking abilities. He was a good blocker in the good days when he was with the packers. But, I don't like this move at all, I'd rather have Dominic Rhodes on our team than Green. Let's see if he can teach Ryan Grant how to run the football and not just fall down when some lays a pinkie on him.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



Bingo....

This was clearly a move based on blocking and receiving skills. If the Packers were looking for a player to run in between the tackles, Kregg Lumpkin would've been promoted from the practice squad.

Grant isn't much of a third down back nor much of a receiver and Jackson has always been a work in progress with his blocking. Like it or not, that was a weakness. I personally like the move. Nobody out there is going to solve the Packers' running game problems, but blocking is a whole different story. The Packers looked at a key area which is 3rd down, receiving, and blocking and they upgraded. Nothing wrong with that.

"porky88" wrote:



Yep. Put this in context - McCarthy's been revisiting early '07 lately with more short, quick passes - Green is a great screen guy - Green's also good pass blocker. It makes sense. no, it isn't a tackle or some big name like Jackson, but I think we as fans are going to have to accept that Thompson just doesn't do that much.

I'd rank this with the Chillar pickup - he's got skills they can use, and unlike with Chillar the unit as a whole isn't that far off course.

"Kingdom22" wrote:



We'll see how much of a screen guy he still is.

Grant can't catch a ball to save his life. Neither could Wynn. Jackson isn't much of a blocker, but a good screen guy and good in space. Problem is, how good is Green still at screens? When our O-line can't even get in front of our RB, I'd rather have Grant out there than Green at this point in his career.

And he always was a decent blocker with the Packers. Not so much with the Texans.

Chris Perry is still out there. So is JJ Arington. Maybe they're a little less in the blocking department, but not by much. And they haven't hit that 30s wall that hit Green so horribly hard.

I don't think that this is a horrible signing at all. He's an ok player. I just think that we could've gotten more out of guys like the two that I mentioned earlier, because Green has declined horribly in the last two years.
Pack93z
15 years ago
UserPostedImage
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
aa-rod_is_cool
15 years ago

Kuhn wont give up #30 eh?

"TengoJuego" wrote:



Nor should he.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



If Ahman asked for it, he should. Or I would if I were Kuhn.

"TengoJuego" wrote:




Maybe he'll pay him for the number like he did in Houston
blank
musccy
15 years ago
i think rockmolder spoke for the 'critics' very well. If Ted is going to make a move, though I'm glad that he did, it seems that there were other options that could have been better.

Of course we're not going to find our ticket to the superbowl lying on the couch in October, but Ahman has been borderline awful since hitting about 29 Y.O. where guys such as Arrington or Rhodes showed some glimmer of life recently.
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

I don't think the Packers brought Ahman back for the running game but for his blocking abilities. He was a good blocker in the good days when he was with the packers. But, I don't like this move at all, I'd rather have Dominic Rhodes on our team than Green. Let's see if he can teach Ryan Grant how to run the football and not just fall down when some lays a pinkie on him.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Bingo....

This was clearly a move based on blocking and receiving skills. If the Packers were looking for a player to run in between the tackles, Kregg Lumpkin would've been promoted from the practice squad.

Grant isn't much of a third down back nor much of a receiver and Jackson has always been a work in progress with his blocking. Like it or not, that was a weakness. I personally like the move. Nobody out there is going to solve the Packers' running game problems, but blocking is a whole different story. The Packers looked at a key area which is 3rd down, receiving, and blocking and they upgraded. Nothing wrong with that.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



Yep. Put this in context - McCarthy's been revisiting early '07 lately with more short, quick passes - Green is a great screen guy - Green's also good pass blocker. It makes sense. no, it isn't a tackle or some big name like Jackson, but I think we as fans are going to have to accept that Thompson just doesn't do that much.

I'd rank this with the Chillar pickup - he's got skills they can use, and unlike with Chillar the unit as a whole isn't that far off course.

"porky88" wrote:



We'll see how much of a screen guy he still is.

Grant can't catch a ball to save his life. Neither could Wynn. Jackson isn't much of a blocker, but a good screen guy and good in space. Problem is, how good is Green still at screens? When our O-line can't even get in front of our RB, I'd rather have Grant out there than Green at this point in his career.

And he always was a decent blocker with the Packers. Not so much with the Texans.

Chris Perry is still out there. So is JJ Arington. Maybe they're a little less in the blocking department, but not by much. And they haven't hit that 30s wall that hit Green so horribly hard.

I don't think that this is a horrible signing at all. He's an ok player. I just think that we could've gotten more out of guys like the two that I mentioned earlier, because Green has declined horribly in the last two years.

"Kingdom22" wrote:




Well, clearly it's neither a big signing or a big deal. Frankly, neither would Perry or Arrington - at least Green did produce at a high level at some point in his career, which is hard to say about either of those two backs.

The way I see it, at worst Green retires in GB, where he belongs - and maybe they get something out of him. Bonus, if that's the case.

Bottom line is that Thompson isn't going to get us anything substantial via trade or FA, and certainly will never make the kinds of moves that get bandied about this board. It is what it is.

I hope Green's got more in the tank than we suspect - if so, he could do a lot to open up those underneath routes and provide a good safety net for Rodgers. Like you said, we'll see.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

If Ahman asked for it, he should. Or I would if I were Kuhn.

"TengoJuego" wrote:



Why? What's in it for him? At this point Green is the #3 halfback. Kuhn leads the team with 3 TDs.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago

If Ahman asked for it, he should. Or I would if I were Kuhn.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Why? What's in it for him? At this point Green is the #3 halfback. Kuhn leads the team with 3 TDs.

"TengoJuego" wrote:



PR? Just being a nice guy? Sentiment? I would change my number if I where Kuhn for such a Packers legend as Green.
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I suppose. I guess I just don't think of Ahman Green as a legend. My main memories of him are of wondering when he was going to fumble the ball. Then again, this was during the period when I was limited to listening to the games on the radio, so I didn't get to see much of him on the field. I have far more memories of Dorsey Levins than I do of Ahman Gren.

I still don't think I'd give him the number. He chose to leave the Packers for greener pastures and has done essentially nothing since. And like I said, he's coming in as the #3 halfback, not the featured horse.

But I'm an iconoclast, so I'm sure that colors things too.
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
15 years ago
I love the signing. I wouldn't mind seeing a two back system between Green and Grant. That would be pretty good, IMO.

Although, I did hear in a previous post that JJ Arrington was still available. That would be a good change of pace back.....good speed out of the backfield. Also would help our return game....

I'm very thankful to see Green back in the Green and Gold, and I'm glad that he will retire a Packer.
UserPostedImage
rodgehodge
15 years ago
I don't see how anybody can feel anything but maybe nostalgic about this signing. There's nothing but upside to bringing Green in at a #3. I mean, with Grant struggling to reach 20 carries in a game so far, how much impact has our #3 RB had up to this point? If Green can come in and contribute, that's fantastic. If he can't, we aren't any worse off.


Personally, I'd like to see our coaching staff really dig in and work with what we have rather than have Thompson out there trying to bring in new pieces. I feel like we have the talent to be a serious contender, even with our OL issues. I haven't been impressed with the play calling on both offense and defense so far the past couple weeks. I think we need to be out there utilizing our players the best way we can before we go out and try to make blockbuster trades like some people were hoping for.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (1h) : meh
Zero2Cool (5h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (5h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (5h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (8h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (8h) : Only 4
wpr (8h) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (11h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (11h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.