Pack93z
15 years ago
I wonder how Sutton would have performed behind this line in the regular season..

My opinion, we have been lacking a change of pace back for years.. Jackson and Grant are the same type of players without a big burst or quick feet.. Wynn is a (should be) bruiser.. I dare say none on this roster could have "elusive" pinned to their resume..

I would love to have a "speed" or "scat" back type to drop in here on certain situations just to add that element to our attack..

Ryan Torain is a little more of the same of what we have.. Quinton Ganther is a bowling ball type runner that packs a little thump.. shorter Wynn type?
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
evad04
15 years ago
To be fair to McCarthy, he stressed that balanced playcalling was a big reason why the Pack's offense was able to move the ball more consistently against St. Louis. I think he does seem committed to running the ball more -- but that isn't the strength of this team, and when you play a team like Minnesota you don't play a relative weakness of your own into their strength.

It's like people have completely forgot we're only four games in. I'm not making a huge generalization here about all the responses -- I'm referring specifically to the notion that McCarthy abandons the run after the first quarter. I don't think there's enough evidence this season to suggest that.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Stevetarded
15 years ago
At this point I wouldn't be against dumping Wynn to give Lumpkin a look. With the way Wynn has played so far I think Lump is a more promising 3rd down back replacement for B. Jackson while he is injured.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Sutton runs a 40 in 4.7.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
15 years ago
I don't look at our run game as any major concern.

For one thing three out of the four teams we've played rank in the top twelve in run defense. Having said that we average about 17 yards less a game than the Vikings and all anybody talks about is how great they are at running the ball.

McCarthy has the right balance in the play calling. When your in a dogfight of a game you go with what you do best most and offset that with the other phase just enough to stay effective.

If we can get a hundred yards a game out of it I'm fine with it.

If anything the passing game needs to start clicking better and it will help our run game. That's when you can slip in those runs and break a big one now and then. Until we get better production in the pass protection area it will affect the run game because when down and distance is against the offense it's not a recipe for the run game to be successful.
"The train is leaving the station."
packfan4
15 years ago

Sutton runs a 40 in 4.7.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Not to mention he is God awful in pass protection, making him a poor fit as a 3rd down back. People need to let go of the thought that Preseason standouts like Tyrell Sutton and Anthony Smith are missing links on this roster. They played well in the Preseason, well guess what? So did our Offensive Line! Sutton has been active for 1 game thus far, when Carolina's 3rd RB Mike Goodson was out with a concussion and Anthony Smith has yet to be active for the Rams.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago

Sutton runs a 40 in 4.7.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



First, 40 times verse elusive are two different things.. quick feet, rapid cuts, body control can't be measured in a 40. Most overrated measurement ever created..

Second, I just wondered out loud how he would have ran behind this line.. he seems to be able to make one or two defenders miss once in a while.. something lacking on the roster currently... maybe Jackson brings that element in a small dose.

Third, Mr. Packfan4, taking player A from Team A, then sticking him on Team B and expecting the same results or activity isn't valid always. Look at the depth on the Carolina Running Backs... not a lot of reason to give carries past Williams or Stewart is there. But Carolina for all the flaws they have, see enough potential in Sutton to make a roster spot for him on a team with two excellent backs sitting one, two.

And if you are going to use the pass blocking as the primary reason not to retain him, then you might as well cut Jackson as well.. and he has been taught how many years.

Smith fits because of experience in the scheme over Martin, Bush, Rouse or Giordano at this point.. I certainly don't think he is an elite safety, but he fit better than what we kept in the short term.

People need to jump off that crap.. saying it was a mistake not to retain a player like Smith isn't out the realm.. it was a freaking mistake.. Ted, Mike and company made it.. it is what it is. Just as they made some great calls as well, building a roster in the NFL is a hit and miss proposition by nature.. call them as we see them.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
IronMan
15 years ago

[People need to let go of the thought that Preseason standouts like Tyrell Sutton and Anthony Smith are missing links on this roster. They played well in the Preseason, well guess what? So did our Offensive Line!

"packfan4" wrote:


+1
djcubez
15 years ago


I would love to have a "speed" or "scat" back type to drop in here on certain situations just to add that element to our attack..

"pack93z" wrote:


I've thought this for a long time. Last two years I thought it would be Lumpkin, but first it was practice squad and then IR. This year I thought maybe Sutton would get through (even though he's technically not really a scat back). I mean, Lumpkin is on our practice squad now right? I wonder why he hasn't gotten a chance?
Felipe7777777
15 years ago
I agree we dont have a good change of pace back, ala Ahmad Bradshaw/Darren Sproles, etc...i thought Sutton would be at least close to that but apparently not...
blank
Fan Shout
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.