Packer Grading· Page 2

porky88
Veteran Member

15 years ago

Hawk lead the team in tackles. He played with great pursuit and was as stout as he's been in along time. He made a few tackles on Jackson that saved what would've been much bigger gains.

Shit is not the right word to use for Hawk's performance.

Jenkins, Woodson, Rodgers, Driver minus his drop, and Jolly all played solid games.

I thought the Packers did a nice job of containing the backside as that's what Jackson likes to do. They'll have to do the same next week.

http://www.row12.com/

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#12

I see his effort every week, and every week I am more and more convinced that he truly is muscle-bound. he's got the motor, but he just looks like he's running through a vat of molasses.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#13

"porky88" wrote:

did u notice the at least 2 plays where he took TERRIBLE angles and gave up at least 10 more yards than he should have?

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Kingkoopa
Registered

15 years ago

#14

For whatever reason hawk always looks very slow. He is timed as our fastest LB, but he plays like our fattest. I'm not sure why he plays so slow. I thought it may have been the old scheme, but he is still plays the same way in the new scheme.

blank

wpr
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#15

Once again I am not assigning a grade and I know statistics are not everything but their were plenty of areas of concern in this game considering that they played a team that has now lost 13 consecutive games.

GB only had 2 more first downs than the inept Rams. Part of that is due to their huge plays on offense. Part of that is not being able to shut down Jackson who had a 117 yards on the ground.

GB won the time of possession by only 40 seconds. Big plays helped but it shows they did not dominate a team they should have.

Being 2-9 on 3rd down is something that could hurt them in future games.

Not finishing the 1st Q drives by getting TDs instead of FGs.

When you consider that GB got 149 of their 250 yards passing on only 3 plays it does not look good that they only got 101 yards on the other 21 plays.

I saw the dropped passes in 3rd Q I don't know if they dropped other ones but they are a better team than that.

If GB is going to have any hope of winning next week they must play a whole lot better than they did today.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#16

"wpr" wrote:

agreed completely. anyone who was happy with how we played today didn't watch much of the game.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

RedSoxExcel
Registered

15 years ago

#17

There is no doubt that if we play like we did today, we are unlikely to beat the Vikings on the road but there were goods signs I saw for sure.

blank

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#18

I said it before the game, I will say it again now. I'm more optimistic about the Vikings game than I was for this one.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#19

Chillar was smoked for ONE TD, not two. The second TD was a excellent throw and the coverage was good. No one could have done better on the coverage. Watch the replays.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I have to say he was scorched on two. He may have been closer, but he was giving it all he had just to keep close. Never had a chance of defending either pass.

Over all. Jolly,Woody had good games, the rest of the defense was average. I didn't like the 5/6 LBer experiment. It looked at time like they did not know exactly what they were doing. Think this was a move to work Martin in slower.

Offense was slow off the start, but settled in fairly nicely. Barbre still needs to work on his drop step, and Colledge needs to watch for inside moves, and the protection should be better.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#20

what's the story with Barnett's absence in the second half? Bishop played pretty well in replacing barnett.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (6h) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24