Hawk lead the team in tackles. He played with great pursuit and was as stout as he's been in along time. He made a few tackles on Jackson that saved what would've been much bigger gains.

Shit is not the right word to use for Hawk's performance.

Jenkins, Woodson, Rodgers, Driver minus his drop, and Jolly all played solid games.

I thought the Packers did a nice job of containing the backside as that's what Jackson likes to do. They'll have to do the same next week.

"porky88" wrote:

Once again I am not assigning a grade and I know statistics are not everything but their were plenty of areas of concern in this game considering that they played a team that has now lost 13 consecutive games.

GB only had 2 more first downs than the inept Rams. Part of that is due to their huge plays on offense. Part of that is not being able to shut down Jackson who had a 117 yards on the ground.

GB won the time of possession by only 40 seconds. Big plays helped but it shows they did not dominate a team they should have.

Being 2-9 on 3rd down is something that could hurt them in future games.

Not finishing the 1st Q drives by getting TDs instead of FGs.

When you consider that GB got 149 of their 250 yards passing on only 3 plays it does not look good that they only got 101 yards on the other 21 plays.

I saw the dropped passes in 3rd Q I don't know if they dropped other ones but they are a better team than that.

If GB is going to have any hope of winning next week they must play a whole lot better than they did today.

"wpr" wrote:

Chillar was smoked for ONE TD, not two. The second TD was a excellent throw and the coverage was good. No one could have done better on the coverage. Watch the replays.

"Zero2Cool" wrote: