Packer Grading· Page 2

porky88
Veteran Member

15 years ago

Hawk lead the team in tackles. He played with great pursuit and was as stout as he's been in along time. He made a few tackles on Jackson that saved what would've been much bigger gains.

Shit is not the right word to use for Hawk's performance.

Jenkins, Woodson, Rodgers, Driver minus his drop, and Jolly all played solid games.

I thought the Packers did a nice job of containing the backside as that's what Jackson likes to do. They'll have to do the same next week.

http://www.row12.com/

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#12

I see his effort every week, and every week I am more and more convinced that he truly is muscle-bound. he's got the motor, but he just looks like he's running through a vat of molasses.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#13

"porky88" wrote:

did u notice the at least 2 plays where he took TERRIBLE angles and gave up at least 10 more yards than he should have?

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Kingkoopa
Registered

15 years ago

#14

For whatever reason hawk always looks very slow. He is timed as our fastest LB, but he plays like our fattest. I'm not sure why he plays so slow. I thought it may have been the old scheme, but he is still plays the same way in the new scheme.

blank

wpr
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#15

Once again I am not assigning a grade and I know statistics are not everything but their were plenty of areas of concern in this game considering that they played a team that has now lost 13 consecutive games.

GB only had 2 more first downs than the inept Rams. Part of that is due to their huge plays on offense. Part of that is not being able to shut down Jackson who had a 117 yards on the ground.

GB won the time of possession by only 40 seconds. Big plays helped but it shows they did not dominate a team they should have.

Being 2-9 on 3rd down is something that could hurt them in future games.

Not finishing the 1st Q drives by getting TDs instead of FGs.

When you consider that GB got 149 of their 250 yards passing on only 3 plays it does not look good that they only got 101 yards on the other 21 plays.

I saw the dropped passes in 3rd Q I don't know if they dropped other ones but they are a better team than that.

If GB is going to have any hope of winning next week they must play a whole lot better than they did today.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#16

"wpr" wrote:

agreed completely. anyone who was happy with how we played today didn't watch much of the game.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

RedSoxExcel
Registered

15 years ago

#17

There is no doubt that if we play like we did today, we are unlikely to beat the Vikings on the road but there were goods signs I saw for sure.

blank

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#18

I said it before the game, I will say it again now. I'm more optimistic about the Vikings game than I was for this one.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#19

Chillar was smoked for ONE TD, not two. The second TD was a excellent throw and the coverage was good. No one could have done better on the coverage. Watch the replays.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I have to say he was scorched on two. He may have been closer, but he was giving it all he had just to keep close. Never had a chance of defending either pass.

Over all. Jolly,Woody had good games, the rest of the defense was average. I didn't like the 5/6 LBer experiment. It looked at time like they did not know exactly what they were doing. Think this was a move to work Martin in slower.

Offense was slow off the start, but settled in fairly nicely. Barbre still needs to work on his drop step, and Colledge needs to watch for inside moves, and the protection should be better.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#20

what's the story with Barnett's absence in the second half? Bishop played pretty well in replacing barnett.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (30m) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (31m) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (10h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (10h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (12h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (13h) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (14h) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (14h) : Thank you

wpr (14h) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (14h) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (14h) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (14h) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (14h) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (15h) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (15h) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (15h) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (15h) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (15h) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE

packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.

Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22