British
15 years ago
Sounds like a close call.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/3342/questionable-call-illegal-contact-on-harris 

Todays topic comes from Sunday nights Chicago-Green Bay game. Jeff of Naperville, Ill., wrote that it was appalling to see the game nearly decided on an illegal contact call against Packers cornerback Al Harris in the fourth quarter.

Indeed, officials whistled Harris for illegal contact against receiver Devin Hester on a third-down play at the Packers 40-yard line with 8:39 remaining in the game. Green Bay held a 13-12 lead at the time, and quarterback Jay Cutlers pass to receiver Earl Bennett had fallen incomplete. (In fact, cornerback Charles Woodson made a diving tip to alter its trajectory.) Its highly unlikely the Bears would have attempted a 57-yard field goal, and they almost certainly would have punted.

This type of call is especially frustrating, knowing it happened away from the play. When you watch the replay, it doesnt look like Cutler considered throwing to Hester. (Maybe he should have. After the contact, Hester was wide open.)

I scoured the NFL rule book to see what applied to this play. Heres what the rules allow (Section 4, Article 1 if youre interested):

Within five yards of the line of scrimmage, a defensive player may chuck an eligible receiver in front of him. The defender is allowed to maintain continuous and unbroken contact within the five-yard zone, so long as the receiver has not moved beyond a point that is even with the defender.

When you watch the replay, you see Harris lightly shove Hester just as he crossed the 35-yard line. At that point, its a judgment call by the official to determine Hesters distance from the line of scrimmage. Even though Harris contact was a routine chuck for a cornerback passing off the receiver in zone coverage, the power of the contact is not part of the rule.

But lets say you disagree that Hester was past the 5-yard marker, or you believe it was too close to call. There is another part of this rule that I cant say I was aware of (Section 4, Article 2):

Within the five-yard zone, if the player who receives the snap remains in the pocket with the ball, a defender may not make original contact in the back of a receiver, nor may he maintain contact after the receiver has moved beyond a point that is even with the defender.

When you watch the replay, Harris definitely shoves Hester on the back of his right shoulder. It wasnt hard and it didnt really knock Hester off his route. But if you want to make a strict interpretation of this rule, you can say Harris made original contact in the back of a receiver, an illegal play even if it occurs within the 5-yard radius.

I cant read the mind of the officials who made the call. But in retrospect, you can produce a rule to match the call. I acknowledge that similar plays go uncalled all the time. But was it in error? Im not sure we can make that argument. Whether the rule should be in place is another debate entirely.



Added

tags for attribution purposes. --NSD


UserPostedImage
Brettizzle
15 years ago
No way, that should never be called. If Harris was a few yards back then I would understand. But at that point in the game and where the contact happened that should never be called. If it was a corner that doesn't have a history of being aggressive then the flag would not have been thrown.
Jermichael Finley

We will be in Indianapolis

bozz_2006
15 years ago
only he didn't "make original contact in the back of a receiver". Harris jammed him in the front of Hester's right shoulder with his right hand, and the side of Hester's right shoulder with his left hand. I don't see how that is open to interpretation; he most certainly did not make original contact in Hester's back in any way, shape, or form
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago

only he didn't jam him in the back of the shoulder.

"bozz_2006" wrote:




Seifert joined ESPN.com in 2008 after covering the Minnesota Vikings for the Minneapolis Star Tribune for eight years. He lives in the Twin Cities with his wife and daughter.

bozz_2006
15 years ago
thanks for illustrating that foster, but still, what he's proposing isn't even a stretch. it's a flat out load of bullshit. I live in the twin cities, and I haven't talked to a single vikings fan who thought that was a legit penalty.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago
I find him infuriating at times.

This would be one of those.

I bet his relatives are some of those judges deciding the Williams' wall cases.
Patlee22
15 years ago
Yeah, it's BS. Barely any contact and to have it be called in a rivarly game is a little nitpicky. Again, this kind of stuff that usually seems to get us in crucial moments.
blank
Yerko
15 years ago
The fact that someone even went into the rule book for this is beyond me. I watched the game with my father, a die-hard Chicago fan and he even said what the hell is that ref calling?

Horrible call, end of story.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
That article doesn't even deserved to be printed on a piece of toilet paper. The chuck was no were near having initial contact on Hester's back. The only logical explanation is that the Ref couldn't tell how far from the LOS the check happened because of Hester being lined up off the ball to start. And Hester's play acting after the contact, because he wasn't even an actual option for that pass.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
gbguy20
15 years ago
regardless of whether that call was "legit" (it was ridiculous either way and should have never been called), the bears should have been flagged immediately after they snapped the ball for illegal formation. The refs fucked up bad and nearly cost us the game. There's no place for calls like that and honestly that ref deserves a good talking to and a swift kick in the ass.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (44m) : Never. But gonna be looking different in few days :D
yooperfan (1h) : Whew, I got it back. I was afraid that I lost this site for good.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Harrisburg Packers
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yes
Zero2Cool (2h) : No.
dfosterf (3h) : The man carried us a lot of the time
dfosterf (3h) : I think a Kenny Clark tribute is in order
Zero2Cool (11h) : new site, text editor gooder even on phone
beast (11h) : Oh yes, sometimes they make using a cellphone tough. I just wanted to make sure it was the correct article, & thank you for pointing it out.
jdlax (13h) : I can't believe one of my teams went out and wablammo just up and acquired one of the best players in the world overnight
dfosterf (17h) : I do very much appreciate when Beast and others pick up my slack 😊
dfosterf (17h) : I accept Beast's admonishment regarding my failure to link stuff I reference. I simply never learned to link from my cell phone.
beast (18h) : That's not what your she said 😌, she said keep going 😏
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Anything over 4 hours means he needs to get to the hospital
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Someone might want to check on Hafley and make sure his erection has gone down
Zero2Cool (23h) : LaFleur texts "bleep me I cannot sit down"
Zero2Cool (23h) : YouTube has had me last hour or two lol
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Ugh this trade happened right as my shift started and it's killing me
Zero2Cool (23h) : Parsons wore 23 in high school.
Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers just cost Lions more money with Hutchinson too huh
Zero2Cool (28-Aug) : That is fair by me.
buckeyepackfan (28-Aug) : Kenny Clark is the player, 2 1st rnd picks
Zero2Cool (28-Aug) : umm... what?
wpr (28-Aug) : I am stunned
Mucky Tundra (28-Aug) : RICKEY SCOOPS WAS RIGHT AGAIN!!!
Mucky Tundra (28-Aug) : ITS HAPPENING
buckeyepackfan (28-Aug) : DEAL IS DONE
buckeyepackfan (28-Aug) : MICAH IS COMING TO GREEN BAY!!!!!!!!!
wpr (28-Aug) : Me do-ed it gooderly,
Zero2Cool (28-Aug) : Bahah, I was like WTF why isn't anyone posting on PP.com ... oops no one has permissions
dfosterf (27-Aug) : tell her I reckon
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Micah Robinson cut. Probable PS player tomorrow. Has to call mom back and t
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : New site so much better. Might make switch and deal with it.
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Mecole Hardman to our practice squad
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Nick Nieman from Texans our 5th linebacker. Special teams signing
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Looks like we signed Clayton Tune as QB3
wpr (27-Aug) : TKT people lose their minds over QB3. Point is almost none of them are ready that's why they are on the PS and other teams don't take them.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Unfortunately he doesn't seem ready to be an emergency QB.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : As a Canadian and a follower of Canadian University football. I am rooting for him
dfosterf (27-Aug) : I bet a lot of us will follow the Taylor Elgersma journey with interest. Personally, got a Kurt Warner vibe goin' on. I like him
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Not sure if either will be claimed though.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Tune or Hooker would make sense
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Clayton Tune cut by the Cards? Don't know if that's the guy, we shall see
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Per Bill Huber, the Packers will not be bringing back Taylor Elgersma or Sean Clifford on the practice squad, so a new third quarterback
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Schefter must have deleted his tweet
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Hopefully Jerry reaches under the seat cushions and ashtrays of his jet and scrapes up the 45 million apr and spares us further nonsense
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Have to admit the PO'd Cowboy fan videos would be fun to watch. Problem with draft picks is half their fanbase barely knows what that is
beast (27-Aug) : I think Cowboys fans are ready to get their pitch forks and burning sticks if Jerry were to trade Micah
dfosterf (27-Aug) : If Jerry traded Micah to GB, here in northern Va. they would have to quick build yet another data center to handle the internet hate traffic
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : its signing and trades that you don't hear about, other then announced
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

27-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.