Tyrell Sutton· Page 2 · PACKERSHOME

Felipe7777777
Registered

15 years ago

I think/hope he sticks, i think it'll be Grant, Jackson, Sutton and stick Wynn on the PS...

I've been seeing many people being enamored with Wynn and i honestly dont see why, YES he is a good pass protector but him being a GOOD running back? Not to me, when he "broke out" before he got injured i still wasnt impressed, i thought it had more to do with the blocking than Wynn's skills, i like sutton due to his agility and the way he hits the holes, and with Wynn his pass protection is a big plus but im sure/hope Sutton can pick that up ASAP so he can make the team, Lumpy has been kinda dissapointing lately hasnt made much noise though so im not sure what they will do wit him......either way Sutton makes it!

blank

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

#12

I think Jackson could be a good short yardage back. He's deceptively strong and he rarely gets hit for a loss. He almost always pushes forward for another yard.

Felipe7777777
Registered

15 years ago

#13

I think Jackson could be a good short yardage back. He's deceptively strong and he rarely gets hit for a loss. He almost always pushes forward for another yard.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:

I agree, Jackson SHOULD be able to work in short yardage situations, but hopefully he gets many chances to showcase it

blank

masseyattack
Registered

15 years ago

#14

My problem with keeping Sutton over Wynn is that we do not have a banger back that can get the 3rd and short and 4th and 1's.

You saw it again Saturday, Sitton whiffs on his block and Grant gets stuck for a loss. I don't know why McCarthey is so fricken stubborn. Put 4 wides on the field and pick up the first down. Let Grant run out of that formation, at least you won't have 9 in the box.

I'll take Sutton over Lumpkin, but not Wynn. The way to retain Sutton is keep 4 backs and go with less at another position. No way in hell he clears waivers.

"DakotaT" wrote:

Great point. It's worth adding that as Kuhn looks like the odd-man out in the full-back competition the Packers wouldn't be able to use him to carry the ball in short yardage as they did at times last season (unless Johnson carries the ball?).

blank

packersfan99
Registered

15 years ago

#15

I think they should keep both Lumpkin and Sutton. I like very much what Lumpkin did last year on the preseason games before he got injured. I still believe he can develop into a nice RB and also like how Sutton plays this last games. So i would put Wynn in the waivers

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

TengoJuego
Rookie

15 years ago

#16

Practice squad. He doesn't make the team. Hall, QJ and Kuhn will be kept on before adding a 4th RB.

Dulak
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#17

Just watched the 3rd and 4th quarter here ... I really liked suttons running ... small guy but good reads - I wonder how he could do as a return man also.

LambeauEast
Rookie

15 years ago

#18

I really like what Sutton has to offer, minus blitz pick-up. All I know for sure is that McCarthy is going to have a tough time with his decision. Because if he's put on the practice squad, he won't be there for long...IMO.

I like Wynn also, but him and those injuries worry me.

Screw it, keep Grant, Jackson, Wynn, Sutton, Hall and and Johnson!

Sorry Blumpkin and Kuhn!

millertime
Member

15 years ago

#19

I like him a lot, but I'd also like to see Wynn get some more touches. Kid's got so much talent if he can stay healthy and keep his head straight.

nyrpack
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#20

keep him , the way grant and jackson get banged up, you never have enough healthy backs !!

jimmy b.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Martha Careful (6h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (6h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Rude!

beast (10h) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (14h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (16h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (18h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22