Tyrell Sutton· Page 2 · PACKERSHOME

Felipe7777777
Registered

15 years ago

I think/hope he sticks, i think it'll be Grant, Jackson, Sutton and stick Wynn on the PS...

I've been seeing many people being enamored with Wynn and i honestly dont see why, YES he is a good pass protector but him being a GOOD running back? Not to me, when he "broke out" before he got injured i still wasnt impressed, i thought it had more to do with the blocking than Wynn's skills, i like sutton due to his agility and the way he hits the holes, and with Wynn his pass protection is a big plus but im sure/hope Sutton can pick that up ASAP so he can make the team, Lumpy has been kinda dissapointing lately hasnt made much noise though so im not sure what they will do wit him......either way Sutton makes it!

blank

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

#12

I think Jackson could be a good short yardage back. He's deceptively strong and he rarely gets hit for a loss. He almost always pushes forward for another yard.

Felipe7777777
Registered

15 years ago

#13

I think Jackson could be a good short yardage back. He's deceptively strong and he rarely gets hit for a loss. He almost always pushes forward for another yard.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:

I agree, Jackson SHOULD be able to work in short yardage situations, but hopefully he gets many chances to showcase it

blank

masseyattack
Registered

15 years ago

#14

My problem with keeping Sutton over Wynn is that we do not have a banger back that can get the 3rd and short and 4th and 1's.

You saw it again Saturday, Sitton whiffs on his block and Grant gets stuck for a loss. I don't know why McCarthey is so fricken stubborn. Put 4 wides on the field and pick up the first down. Let Grant run out of that formation, at least you won't have 9 in the box.

I'll take Sutton over Lumpkin, but not Wynn. The way to retain Sutton is keep 4 backs and go with less at another position. No way in hell he clears waivers.

"DakotaT" wrote:

Great point. It's worth adding that as Kuhn looks like the odd-man out in the full-back competition the Packers wouldn't be able to use him to carry the ball in short yardage as they did at times last season (unless Johnson carries the ball?).

blank

packersfan99
Registered

15 years ago

#15

I think they should keep both Lumpkin and Sutton. I like very much what Lumpkin did last year on the preseason games before he got injured. I still believe he can develop into a nice RB and also like how Sutton plays this last games. So i would put Wynn in the waivers

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

TengoJuego
Rookie

15 years ago

#16

Practice squad. He doesn't make the team. Hall, QJ and Kuhn will be kept on before adding a 4th RB.

Dulak
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#17

Just watched the 3rd and 4th quarter here ... I really liked suttons running ... small guy but good reads - I wonder how he could do as a return man also.

LambeauEast
Rookie

15 years ago

#18

I really like what Sutton has to offer, minus blitz pick-up. All I know for sure is that McCarthy is going to have a tough time with his decision. Because if he's put on the practice squad, he won't be there for long...IMO.

I like Wynn also, but him and those injuries worry me.

Screw it, keep Grant, Jackson, Wynn, Sutton, Hall and and Johnson!

Sorry Blumpkin and Kuhn!

millertime
Member

15 years ago

#19

I like him a lot, but I'd also like to see Wynn get some more touches. Kid's got so much talent if he can stay healthy and keep his head straight.

nyrpack
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#20

keep him , the way grant and jackson get banged up, you never have enough healthy backs !!

jimmy b.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (1h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (1h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (1h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (1h) : now 3

Zero2Cool (2h) : Who? What?

beast (11h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (15h) : meh

Zero2Cool (20h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (20h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (20h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (23h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (23h) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24