Your right Non you got me Ted Thompson does sign people with troubled pasts, Woodson noone wanted him and Robinson noone wanted.
"Rockmolder" wrote:
But isn't it about the eventual result? Apparently, he saw something in Woodson. He might not go out and break the bank and we have all put down our concerns about not signing anyone for the O-line for instance, but why do you have to second guess him even when he actually makes a signing?
Then to top it off he drafted a guy that has failed drug tests, so you are right he does take those huge steps.
"dhazer" wrote:
I hope that you're not refering to Raji, because that claim has been shot down harder than Dick Cheney shot Harry Whittington. Multiple times.
How was it shot down Raji him self said he made a mistake and smoked pot in college and failed a drug test ?
oops Almost forgot him signing Smith away from the Steelers where he was benched because of his character.
"dhazer" wrote:
I recall you wanting to have Haynesworth here. He got sent off of the field because he stomped an O-lineman on the face. Smith has a big ego, but isn't a drug user or anything. From what I've heared, his big mouth combined with getting burned got him off the field. There's worse things than that. Not saying that I want a safety who can't help in pass coverage, but there's room for progression and he's better than Peprah and most likely Rouse.
I never once said i wanted haynesworth in fact i was against it bigtime. He got over paid for a player that is injury prone.
But then again he will not sign the big name player with character issuses AKA Randy Moss.
"dhazer" wrote:
Got offer in, got upped by the Patriots, got traded there. You're not going to pay $20.000,- for a car you can get for $15.000, right?
you folks to seem to forget that after the 2008 season Moss was a free agent and ended up resigning with the Pats and the very next day Favre retired.
I do not even see a hint of Vick in Green Bay, I bet you could bring it up to Ted Thompson and he would just laugh at you.
"dhazer" wrote:
And I agree with you on that one. The Raiders would be a perfect destination if you ask me. I don't know how creative Tom Cable is, but he could be the perfect wildcat. Maybe even just have a rotation of QBs? I mean, if you can rotate at nearly every other potition, why not change the line-up for QBs as well from time to time. If Jamarcus could get a little more accurate, it'd just be scary. The defense would have to back up and move in constantly.
"dhazer" wrote: