DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Three points to make before I leave this thread and DD80 and Dhazer come in and ruin this beautiful day:

1. Aaron Rodgers is the least of my worries. He's shown so far that he is more than a capable quarterback. In ways he will be an improvement on Favre because I don't believe he will be as reckless. Being a gunslinger is storybook and romantic and and all that crap, but being responsible with the football wins football games.

2. Sherman and Favre are gone - get over it finally, please. Can we maybe start discussing the 09 Packers moving forward.

3. I believe the defense this year will be greatly improved just because of the coaches we have installed, but not to be overshadowed by personnel adjustments. I recommend some of you go over to (cough, cough) Chatters and read their articles and threads on the defensive coaches.

We're in for a good year boys, now lets quit the bickering and enjoy the ride.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
15 years ago

Three points to make before I leave this thread and DD80 and Dhazer come in and ruin this beautiful day:

1. Aaron Rodgers is the least of my worries. He's shown so far that he is more than a capable quarterback. In ways he will be an improvement on Favre because I don't believe he will be as reckless. Being a gunslinger is storybook and romantic and and all that crap, but being responsible with the football wins football games.

2. Sherman and Favre are gone - get over it finally, please. Can we maybe start discussing the 09 Packers moving forward.

3. I believe the defense this year will be greatly improved just because of the coaches we have installed, but not to be overshadowed by personnel adjustments. I recommend some of you go over to (cough, cough) Chatters and read their articles and threads on the defensive coaches.

We're in for a good year boys, now lets quit the bickering and enjoy the ride.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Great post + 1
TheOldMan
15 years ago

Big deal.

Two games.

He carried them for, what...how many seasons?

Get real.

"Coddling"?

"I just love the smell of delusional Ted Thompson apologists in the morning. Smells like victory.."

"longtimefan" wrote:



You dont get it?

Brett had the defense pick him up in those 2 games...Which to me means it is a TEAM game

Rodgers played a few bad games in my eyes last year just like Brett did in 07..

Rodgers didnt have the luxury to have a good defense behind him like Brett did.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Really? So you're saying that Aaron Rodgers is just as good as Brett Favre?

hahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks for the laugh. I needed that!
Truth be known, I'm TT's baby!
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

Three points to make before I leave this thread and DD80 and Dhazer come in and ruin this beautiful day:

1. Aaron Rodgers is the least of my worries. He's shown so far that he is more than a capable quarterback. In ways he will be an improvement on Favre because I don't believe he will be as reckless. Being a gunslinger is storybook and romantic and and all that crap, but being responsible with the football wins football games.

2. Sherman and Favre are gone - get over it finally, please. Can we maybe start discussing the 09 Packers moving forward.

3. I believe the defense this year will be greatly improved just because of the coaches we have installed, but not to be overshadowed by personnel adjustments. I recommend some of you go over to (cough, cough) Chatters and read their articles and threads on the defensive coaches.

We're in for a good year boys, now lets quit the bickering and enjoy the ride.

"DakotaT" wrote:




Someone will characterize this optimism as baiting, but I'll just give it a +1.

Not to say I don't have some concerns, but at this point I can either just piss and moan because things didn't go exactly as I wished they would, or I can concentrate on what IS and root for my favorite football team.
blank
15 years ago

Big deal.

Two games.

He carried them for, what...how many seasons?

Get real.

"Coddling"?

"I just love the smell of delusional Ted Thompson apologists in the morning. Smells like victory.."

"TheOldMan" wrote:



You dont get it?

Brett had the defense pick him up in those 2 games...Which to me means it is a TEAM game

Rodgers played a few bad games in my eyes last year just like Brett did in 07..

Rodgers didnt have the luxury to have a good defense behind him like Brett did.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Really? So you're saying that Aaron Rodgers is just as good as Brett Favre?

hahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks for the laugh. I needed that!

"TheOldMan" wrote:



If you look at their entire body of work? Of course not.

Just looking at 2008? Or looking ahead to 2009? Not exactly a laugh-worthy argument.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

Big deal.

Two games.

He carried them for, what...how many seasons?

Get real.

"Coddling"?

"I just love the smell of delusional Ted Thompson apologists in the morning. Smells like victory.."

"TheOldMan" wrote:



You dont get it?

Brett had the defense pick him up in those 2 games...Which to me means it is a TEAM game

Rodgers played a few bad games in my eyes last year just like Brett did in 07..

Rodgers didnt have the luxury to have a good defense behind him like Brett did.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Really? So you're saying that Aaron Rodgers is just as good as Brett Favre?

hahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks for the laugh. I needed that!

"TheOldMan" wrote:




He didn't say anything of the sort, and anyone without a transparent agenda can see that.

Seriously, is anyone aware that Rodgers could be a very good QB for the Packers with a very good career and still not achieve Brett's success? And the Packers could win that way? I'd like someone to explain why he has to be every bit as good as his predecessor, other than it's what some seriously delusional fans expect.
blank
dd80forever
15 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"TheOldMan" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was MM's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and MM said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.
blank
longtimefan
15 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"dd80forever" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was Mike McCarthy's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That was worth of a high 5 and chest bump D80


I cant disagree at all with what you said

You guys hate Ted .......AWESOME we get it and thats your choice

But like this post of yours, you were unbiased and said what I long to hear from people that are ted haters..Which is...

Treat Brett and Rodgers equally PER GAME/PER SEASON...

Brett has had the best career EVER..So you cant judge Rodgers agiasnt that



THANK YOU
wils0646
15 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"dd80forever" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was Mike McCarthy's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That's a good post.

I don't think you'll find a single person on here saying Rodgers wasn't at fault for the 6-10 record. I just don't think he was a problem that needed to be addressed. I also don't think he was even close to the main reason why we ended up 6-10.

The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.



I don't think that it is this simple. Remember, Brett's "good" gave us a 4-12 record. The other poor parts of the team played more of a factor than Brett or Aaron in '05 and '08, respectively.

The thing I don't like about this post is that you're basically giving no credit to Ted Thompson for the 13-3 record while Brett receives it all. It was you who basically said that the team as a whole contributes to the record. The person who built the 13-3 team is Ted Thompson. I just would like you to acknowledge that Ted Thompson had a lot to do with '07, as did Brett.
The Pack Will Be Back.
dfosterf
15 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"longtimefan" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was Mike McCarthy's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.

"dd80forever" wrote:



That was worth of a high 5 and chest bump D80


I cant disagree at all with what you said

You guys hate Ted .......AWESOME we get it and thats your choice

But like this post of yours, you were unbiased and said what I long to hear from people that are ted haters..Which is...

Treat Brett and Rodgers equally PER GAME/PER SEASON...

Brett has had the best career EVER..So you cant judge Rodgers agiasnt that



THANK YOU

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Lots of lessons in there.

Treat everyone with the dignity of a thoughtful post and it just might get read... and not jumped on .

I disagree strongly with several of Andy's points, but I certainly read and understood what he was trying to say, and further appreciated where he is coming from.
Fan Shout
beast (10h) : Technically, the I in FIB stands for Italian now, Si?
dfosterf (12h) : I never thought I'd live long enough to call a pope a FIB, but here we are
Martha Careful (13h) : Chicago produces a pope before it produces a 4000 yard passing quarterback
wpr (14h) : HAHAHA Mucky Comment of the day.
Mucky Tundra (14h) : According to reports, Mel Kiper is furious that Sanders wasn't selected as the new Pope
Zero2Cool (16h) : Time taken to get picked:
Zero2Cool (16h) : New Pope: 2 days | Shedeur Sanders: 3 days
Zero2Cool (17h) : Collin Whitchurch @cowhitchurch · 1h Chicago got a pope before it got a QB to throw for 4,000 yards in a season.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : New Pope from Chicago; in other words, the city produced a Pope before a 4000 yard passer
beast (7-May) : My first name starts with R and my beer belly is quite voluptuous! Thank you for noticing 😏
Zero2Cool (7-May) : beast, you're just one R from being voluptuous.
Zero2Cool (7-May) : And now some Packers blogger is like Doubs to Steelers makes sense!!!!
Zero2Cool (7-May) : You saw me Tweet???
beast (7-May) : Supposedly Steelers will be trading WR George Pickens to the Cowboys for a 3rd and late round pick swap
Zero2Cool (5-May) : Ravens release Justin Tucker, err D. Watson Jr?
Zero2Cool (5-May) : Cardinals have signed TE Josiah Deguara.
Zero2Cool (5-May) : If I were to "Google" it, then I wouldn't read it in your words.
Martha Careful (5-May) : Yes, in the military S2’s work on IPB, PERCEC, PHYSEC and IO
dfosterf (4-May) : FYI civilian companies swipe the S2 designation from the military. S2 is the intelligence branch up to brigade level. G2 is division level.
dfosterf (4-May) : Google it. Make sure to tack NFL on it or you will get the military meaning
Zero2Cool (4-May) : S2?
beast (4-May) : Seems like the S2 has a love/hate relationship with professional scouts.
beast (4-May) : In theory, the S2 test how quickly a QBs brain can solve game like issues and how quickly they can do it.
dfosterf (4-May) : Are you gentlemen and at least one lady familiar with the S2 cognition
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Maybe there isn't an issue.
beast (4-May) : NFL really needs to fix their position labeling issue, but I don't think they care
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Packers did not activate the fifth-year options for linebacker Quay Walker, with the goal of signing him to a contract extension.
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Matthew Golden spoke with Randall Cobb before draft. Looked like chance encounter.
packerfanoutwest (1-May) : from a head left turn?
packerfanoutwest (1-May) : someone drunk?
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Unlikely.
dfosterf (30-Apr) : How long until Jeff Sperbeck's family sues John Elway ?
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : Packers are exercising the fifth-year option on DT Devonte Wyatt, locking in a guaranteed $12.9M for the 2026 season.
beast (30-Apr) : Sounds like P Luke Elzinga has a rookie try out opportunity from the Titans
dfosterf (30-Apr) : Luke Elzinga Punter Oklahoma stil unsigned. Green Bay has been mentioned as good fit
beast (30-Apr) : The Packers re-signed three exclusive rights free agents WR Melton, P Whelan and RB Wilson.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : February 5, 2002 (age 23) ok no. packers.com is wrong
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Micah Robinson is only 19??
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : 6 first rounders on Packers defense now
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : LB Isaiah Simmons. Signed. Called it!!! Oh yeah!
Martha Careful (29-Apr) : ty bboystyle...fat fingers
bboystyle (29-Apr) : Tom*
Martha Careful (28-Apr) : RIP Packer Safety Tim Brown
beast (27-Apr) : Yeah, but also some of the wording suggestions Jax only pranked called the QB, not the others... and if he had an open spreadsheet & 3 calls
beast (27-Apr) : Thank goodness he's not leaving the Turtle in the Red Tide
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Cowboys 1st round pick Tyler Booker will indeed be bringing his pet turtle to Dallas with him
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : that contained all prospects info and contact
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : beast, according the Falcons statement Jax came across it on an ipad. If I had to guess, probably an open spread sheet or something
Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : Simmons put up an emoji with cheese.
beast (27-Apr) : Not sure anyone is interested in Isaiah Simmons... Collin Oliver might of taken his potential slot
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-May / Packers Draft Threads / Martha Careful

3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.