DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
16 years ago
Three points to make before I leave this thread and DD80 and Dhazer come in and ruin this beautiful day:

1. Aaron Rodgers is the least of my worries. He's shown so far that he is more than a capable quarterback. In ways he will be an improvement on Favre because I don't believe he will be as reckless. Being a gunslinger is storybook and romantic and and all that crap, but being responsible with the football wins football games.

2. Sherman and Favre are gone - get over it finally, please. Can we maybe start discussing the 09 Packers moving forward.

3. I believe the defense this year will be greatly improved just because of the coaches we have installed, but not to be overshadowed by personnel adjustments. I recommend some of you go over to (cough, cough) Chatters and read their articles and threads on the defensive coaches.

We're in for a good year boys, now lets quit the bickering and enjoy the ride.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
16 years ago

Three points to make before I leave this thread and DD80 and Dhazer come in and ruin this beautiful day:

1. Aaron Rodgers is the least of my worries. He's shown so far that he is more than a capable quarterback. In ways he will be an improvement on Favre because I don't believe he will be as reckless. Being a gunslinger is storybook and romantic and and all that crap, but being responsible with the football wins football games.

2. Sherman and Favre are gone - get over it finally, please. Can we maybe start discussing the 09 Packers moving forward.

3. I believe the defense this year will be greatly improved just because of the coaches we have installed, but not to be overshadowed by personnel adjustments. I recommend some of you go over to (cough, cough) Chatters and read their articles and threads on the defensive coaches.

We're in for a good year boys, now lets quit the bickering and enjoy the ride.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Great post + 1
TheOldMan
16 years ago

Big deal.

Two games.

He carried them for, what...how many seasons?

Get real.

"Coddling"?

"I just love the smell of delusional Ted Thompson apologists in the morning. Smells like victory.."

"longtimefan" wrote:



You dont get it?

Brett had the defense pick him up in those 2 games...Which to me means it is a TEAM game

Rodgers played a few bad games in my eyes last year just like Brett did in 07..

Rodgers didnt have the luxury to have a good defense behind him like Brett did.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Really? So you're saying that Aaron Rodgers is just as good as Brett Favre?

hahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks for the laugh. I needed that!
Truth be known, I'm TT's baby!
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago

Three points to make before I leave this thread and DD80 and Dhazer come in and ruin this beautiful day:

1. Aaron Rodgers is the least of my worries. He's shown so far that he is more than a capable quarterback. In ways he will be an improvement on Favre because I don't believe he will be as reckless. Being a gunslinger is storybook and romantic and and all that crap, but being responsible with the football wins football games.

2. Sherman and Favre are gone - get over it finally, please. Can we maybe start discussing the 09 Packers moving forward.

3. I believe the defense this year will be greatly improved just because of the coaches we have installed, but not to be overshadowed by personnel adjustments. I recommend some of you go over to (cough, cough) Chatters and read their articles and threads on the defensive coaches.

We're in for a good year boys, now lets quit the bickering and enjoy the ride.

"DakotaT" wrote:




Someone will characterize this optimism as baiting, but I'll just give it a +1.

Not to say I don't have some concerns, but at this point I can either just piss and moan because things didn't go exactly as I wished they would, or I can concentrate on what IS and root for my favorite football team.
blank
16 years ago

Big deal.

Two games.

He carried them for, what...how many seasons?

Get real.

"Coddling"?

"I just love the smell of delusional Ted Thompson apologists in the morning. Smells like victory.."

"TheOldMan" wrote:



You dont get it?

Brett had the defense pick him up in those 2 games...Which to me means it is a TEAM game

Rodgers played a few bad games in my eyes last year just like Brett did in 07..

Rodgers didnt have the luxury to have a good defense behind him like Brett did.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Really? So you're saying that Aaron Rodgers is just as good as Brett Favre?

hahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks for the laugh. I needed that!

"TheOldMan" wrote:



If you look at their entire body of work? Of course not.

Just looking at 2008? Or looking ahead to 2009? Not exactly a laugh-worthy argument.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago

Big deal.

Two games.

He carried them for, what...how many seasons?

Get real.

"Coddling"?

"I just love the smell of delusional Ted Thompson apologists in the morning. Smells like victory.."

"TheOldMan" wrote:



You dont get it?

Brett had the defense pick him up in those 2 games...Which to me means it is a TEAM game

Rodgers played a few bad games in my eyes last year just like Brett did in 07..

Rodgers didnt have the luxury to have a good defense behind him like Brett did.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Really? So you're saying that Aaron Rodgers is just as good as Brett Favre?

hahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks for the laugh. I needed that!

"TheOldMan" wrote:




He didn't say anything of the sort, and anyone without a transparent agenda can see that.

Seriously, is anyone aware that Rodgers could be a very good QB for the Packers with a very good career and still not achieve Brett's success? And the Packers could win that way? I'd like someone to explain why he has to be every bit as good as his predecessor, other than it's what some seriously delusional fans expect.
blank
dd80forever
16 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"TheOldMan" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was MM's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and MM said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.
blank
longtimefan
16 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"dd80forever" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was Mike McCarthy's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That was worth of a high 5 and chest bump D80


I cant disagree at all with what you said

You guys hate Ted .......AWESOME we get it and thats your choice

But like this post of yours, you were unbiased and said what I long to hear from people that are ted haters..Which is...

Treat Brett and Rodgers equally PER GAME/PER SEASON...

Brett has had the best career EVER..So you cant judge Rodgers agiasnt that



THANK YOU
wils0646
16 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"dd80forever" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was Mike McCarthy's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.

"TheOldMan" wrote:



That's a good post.

I don't think you'll find a single person on here saying Rodgers wasn't at fault for the 6-10 record. I just don't think he was a problem that needed to be addressed. I also don't think he was even close to the main reason why we ended up 6-10.

The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.



I don't think that it is this simple. Remember, Brett's "good" gave us a 4-12 record. The other poor parts of the team played more of a factor than Brett or Aaron in '05 and '08, respectively.

The thing I don't like about this post is that you're basically giving no credit to Ted Thompson for the 13-3 record while Brett receives it all. It was you who basically said that the team as a whole contributes to the record. The person who built the 13-3 team is Ted Thompson. I just would like you to acknowledge that Ted Thompson had a lot to do with '07, as did Brett.
The Pack Will Be Back.
dfosterf
16 years ago

Thanks Tripp.

You see, it's the "all or nothing mentality that gets me" on this site.

Well, NONE of it was AROD's fault because the defense would "always fold".

I happen to remember at least 2 GAME ENDING picks thrown by Rodgers last year, and there were times when his play was less than stellar. But no one want's to admit that. They point to his "stats", etc. Well, Jeff George had good stats too, but he was no winner in my book.

Favre, on the other hand, won games in '08 because of his ability to read defenses, and carve them up like the proverbial Christmas goose.

Favre was able to win and put games away, and AROD wasn't. Simple as that. Favre had no running game, and offensive line in '07, yet he was still able to win games, so the excuse that the team was injured, or not very good is invalid.

Favre was still able to win ball games, and AROD isn't, at this point in his career. If AROD will EVER able to put games on his back and win them, well...that remains to be seen. The jury is still out on that one.

But we know that Favre was/is able to do it.

"longtimefan" wrote:




There is so much content in here worth reading that will be passed over without thought because you, like myself, are labeled a Ted Thompson hater.


No single person is to blame for winning or losing games. I don't pin the 6-10 season on A-Rod, though like it or not, there were times when A-Rod made a negative play that impacted the team. I also am not naive enough to pin the 10 losses on "injuries" and then give A-Rod the credit for all 6 wins either.

He is a piece of the puzzle, he contributed. Brett Favre was the same way, he made bad plays that contributed to losses over 16 seasons. It's part of accepting responsibilty and not laying the blame at the feet of a single person in a TEAM sport.

It comes down to intangibles and things that you are not going to find on "stat sheets". If you make a bad throw on 2nd and 6 thats not as bad as making that same bad throw on 3rd and goal. There were times when A-Rod played it safe, or perhaps it was Mike McCarthy's playcalling, that Brett Favre may have threw a rocket into double coverage. Were those balls sometimes picked off, sure. Were they sometimes completed, yes.

No stat line is going to show you that. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy said Brett gave the Packers the best chance to win and I agree. It's not a knock on A-Rod but you give me a choice of Brett or A-Rod and I'll take the veteran proven QB, coming off a pro-bowl year, over the question mark.

A-Rod isn't Brett Favre, for better or worse. You may be thrilled that A-Rod doesn't heave up jump balls llike Brett did, in fact I am as well, but in the same breath, those plays are what made Brett one of the best ever. The fearlessness and never say die attitude can't be found in a box score.

We can argue all day long about which style is better and go nowhere. You have to have some "end result" to tell you the story. Like it or not the end result was substantially different when comparing Brett leading of a 13-3 team and A-Rod leading a 6-10 one.

It's like going back to the INT in the Giants game. We were in the NFC championship game. Brett made a bad throw, I'll agree, however he had us there. Is that worse than A-Rod throwing a bad INT in week 16 when we are already out of the playoffs? I hear how Brett choked when it mattered but in some peoples weird world that's worse than never putting yourself in a position to make that throw.

A-Rod made mistakes and Brett made mistakes. A-rod does good things, Brett does good things. The key is the balance between the two. I will take Brett's good over bad, over A-rods good over bad if the end result is 13-3 with Brett and 6-10 with A-Rod.

That's comparing the QB's contribution to the team. Now in know way am I saying 6-10 is all A-Rods fault or 13-3 is all Brett's doing. The team didn't play as well in 08' as it did in 07' but you can't give A-Rod a free pass either. I think Brett's intangibles over A-rods played a bigger role in the drop-off than most want to believe. It wasn't all the drop off-off in intangibles, nor was it all "injuries". It was a combination of the two, and not just at the QB position.

While A-Rod or Brett can't be held solely responsible, Ted Thompson can. He chooses the pieces to the puzzle. His job is to complete it. Thus far he has yet to find the right pieces to get it done, and I think moves like choosing A-rod over Brett in 08 has contributed to that.

"dd80forever" wrote:



That was worth of a high 5 and chest bump D80


I cant disagree at all with what you said

You guys hate Ted .......AWESOME we get it and thats your choice

But like this post of yours, you were unbiased and said what I long to hear from people that are ted haters..Which is...

Treat Brett and Rodgers equally PER GAME/PER SEASON...

Brett has had the best career EVER..So you cant judge Rodgers agiasnt that



THANK YOU

"TheOldMan" wrote:



Lots of lessons in there.

Treat everyone with the dignity of a thoughtful post and it just might get read... and not jumped on .

I disagree strongly with several of Andy's points, but I certainly read and understood what he was trying to say, and further appreciated where he is coming from.
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
    Zero2Cool (13h) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
    dfosterf (13h) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
    dfosterf (13h) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
    dfosterf (13h) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
    wpr (13h) : seems faster. yay
    dfosterf (14h) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
    Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
    Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
    Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
    Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
    dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
    Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
    Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
    Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
    Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
    beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
    beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
    Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
    Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
    beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
    Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
    Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
    Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
    Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
    Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
    Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
    Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    6-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

    6-Aug / Around The NFL / wpr

    5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.