AJ Dillon had been fairly solid. But it seems Patrick Taylor adds a spark to the offense. Someone needs to tell that kid when to get his ass out of bounds. But his four carries were very impactful where as Dillon was less effective.

The carries should be more to Taylor than Dillon. I say he's earned it.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

If he is too stupid to get out of bounds, which most high schools know to do, he is probably too stupid to pick up blitzes or run any option routes. "Here Patrick, take the ball and run it that way" might be the extent of his capabilities.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 

He's actually the best RB at Pass Protection on the Packers roster, Aaron Jones included.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Says who? Based on what sample size?

And the fact of matter is the most teams have to/need to play 2 guys so unless you have Derek Henry (sp?) it is a mute point.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 

Says the Packers coaching staff.

What? Your second comment doesn't make sense to me.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

The Packers coaching staff says many things...some of which are true.

Re comment 2, the title of the thread is "Patrick Taylor or AJ Dillon" as if it is an either/or decision. My comment meant to say that most every team rotate 2 backs, ergo they are both going to see lots of reps. i.e. it is not one or the other.

And I don't think he has "earned it", a second back is a necessity and he is the tallest midget at this point.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful