Really? I thought Kraft was doing better blocking in run downs that Musgrave did.
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool
Nope, they're scared of Musgrave's speed and don't crowd the line nearly as much with him, which allows them better numbers at the line and an easier job for Musgrave.
Not saying Musgrave is good as run blocking, but Kraft hasn't been good either (in order of their run blocking grade.
Screenshot_20231205-192902~2.png
You have insufficient rights to see the content.Notes: 65.0 is considered average, and all Packers TEs are below 59.0, Musgrave is the best.
Screenshot_20231205-192845~2.png
You have insufficient rights to see the content.One also should look at snap counts, as PFF does it based on big picture, not on pre-snap basis, so someone with a ton of snaps might have a worse grade but be better in a per-snap basis, like Kraft might be better than Dugara and Sims despite Kraft having a worse grade.
But Sims has a -12.2 grade (52.8-65.0) on 57 snaps which is a grade of -0.21 per run blocking play. Whole Kraft has a -16.7 grade on 149 snaps, which is a grade of -0.11 per run blocking play. And Dugara has a -0.14. So Kraft is better per play, than Sims and Dugara, despite having a worse grade.
But Musgrave and Kraft have a similar snap counts so that's not a factor.
Looking at Kraft grades per game
Screenshot_20231205-194827~2.png
You have insufficient rights to see the content.Kraft had 3 better games recently, but also 3 horrible games too. He's much more up and down from one game to the next.
Musgrave is more consistent from game to game. No games below 49.0 and only two games below 55.0. But also with three games above 65.0
I wouldn't be surprised if Kraft becomes the better blocker, but right now he's too inconsistent in that area.