Zero2Cool
a year ago
I have the benefit of sitting on my ass so keep note of that when I give my expert analysis!

This is the Packers first play of the game. You see Watson has to comeback and catch the ball. HOWEVER!! I think if Love wasn't looking off the Safety here and threw a zinger dart where my artistic throwing path is ... TOUCHDOWN!!! We'll have to keep an eye on this play because I think it'll get called more and I think Love will look the Safety off quicker and sling it sooner.

 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
a year ago
I've heard a lot of people complain the ball was under thrown. (It was) "If only Love hit Watson in stride ..." How realistic is it to expect a QB to hit a receiver in the hands 50 yards down the field? Over the years I have seen way too many balls over the receiver's head. Coming back and expecting Watson to make the catch doesn't seem to be an unreasonable request.

I'm sure they will call that play again. The only thing I think will be different is the receiver Love throws to. The defenses are going to key on Watson so look for Doubs or Reed to get the ball. Doubs was open deep. He stopped and came back toward the line bumping into the defender. He he kept going he could have been was open as Watson or more so.

Reed less so because he came over the middle and was running into the LB's zone. A few seconds later he cleared it but who knows how much time Love will have on any given play. With max protect and Doubs doing a hook he can be wide wide open over the deep middle.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago

I've heard a lot of people complain the ball was under thrown. (It was) "If only Love hit Watson in stride ..." How realistic is it to expect a QB to hit a receiver in the hands 50 yards down the field?

Originally Posted by: wpr 


It's realistic if he can throw it sooner. But as I pointed out in my observation... when I would want him to throw it he was busy (correctly) looking the safety off. He holds the ball long enough for Lions to get someone in his face and that's probably why he couldn't get it deeper.

As I've said in other topics, I'd like for him to make decisions quicker. I think it'll lead to more yards after catch. And also stated why he didn't due to looking the Safety off.

This play is encouraging to me because it was a huge gain and with some timing can be a helluva shot play! It's gonna be great!!

This is a positive observation. Not a complaint. Not from me anyway.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (20m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (20m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (20m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (28m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (28m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (49m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.