a year ago

Where in the video was 3 TEs ever mentioned? I saw it said here, but I it wasn't ever said the video... in fact only place I hear offensive personnel mentioned, LaFleaur says Steelers are a big 11 personal which is only 1 TE, not 3 TEs.

82 year old women still lives in pre-2010 football, before those CBA rule changes, that changed the game.

LaFleaur knows exactly what he was talking about in modern football.

Nickel Defense are 4-2 defense with 4 down linemen, on all 32 teams across the league.

3-4 OLBers and 4-3 DE in the modern game are the almost the same exact roles, 3-4 OLBers MIGHT drop into coverage a bit more, depending on which version of the 3-4 it is.

The 3-4 Defense with the lighter OLBers and the totally two gapping up front got phased out with the 2010 CBA practice rule changes.

In the 3-4 DE one gap, which is still around, the OLBers needed to be heavier and the Packers OLBers are.

Those massive LDEs that were mainly to defend the run... they're not even a quarter as popular as they used to be and if they're good enough they're still around, but usually only as backups.

LaFleur knows exactly what he's talking about modern NFL

Originally Posted by: beast 

Don't sass me young man or I will grab you by the ear and twist it off!!!

I am of course joking. I love your posts Beast even when you are wrong, which is rare.

They may have changed rules, but the have not changed the rules of physics.

Although the points you are making are largely correct, they are not in sync with the gist of the suggestion in the question, or the to the game situation.

For MLF to insist that somehow it is ok to be in a 4 (light)-2-5, when an offense is in a 3 tight end set is simply moronic unless the situation is 2nd and long or 3rd and long situation, for all the reasons I provided above. Yes all teams across the league have this package, they don't run it against a 13 package.

Further, even if MLF will not acknowledge that he could have been heavier with the 4 linemen, at the very least he could have acknowledged that the 5 DB's were a mistake give their personnel package.

Go Packers!!!!
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
a year ago

For MLF to insist that somehow it is ok to be in a 4 (light)-2-5, when an offense is in a 3 tight end set is simply moronic

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 

You are correct IF they're talking about 13 personnel... but why does anyone assume they are talking about 13 personnel? Where is that in the conference conversation?

Earlier LaFleaur said the Steelers run mostly run 11 personnel which is 1 RB, 1 TE ... So I don't understand how we believe that LaFleaur was talking about 3 TEs. And the reporter didn't ask about 3 TE set...

Again, you are correct if you assume that LaFleaur is talking about 13 personnel, but I see no reason to assume LaFleaur is talking about 13... especially considering most teams rarely run 13 (other than the Ravens under their now former offensive coordinator). I think most teams run 11, which is what LaFleaur mentioned the Steelers run most of.


UserPostedImage
dfosterf
a year ago
LaFleur

He does not rate that a











Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (6h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (11h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (19h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (19h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (20h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (20h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (21h) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

14h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.