15 years ago

Well non i guess that means we shouldn't plan on the playoffs then for what another 3 years? ๐Ÿ˜› I think we can Mike McCarthy after this year and bring in a billacheat assistant and then we bring in there gm and we will be set :)

"dhazer" wrote:



The foremost Billacheat assistant couldn't even get it done at Notre fucking Dame.

Good luck grabbing a GM from an active GM spot at another team too.

I despise the way NE is run, no matter how successful they are... They reward their emerging players by letting them go (A. Samuel), they pay big money for FA's, they suck at drafting. Cheering for NE is like pimping out a leased car.
UserPostedImage
dd80forever
15 years ago

I expect to win every year with the likes of the Steelers, Pats, and Colts hows that for your answer.

"dhazer" wrote:




Exactly, 1 or 2 down years out of 10 is ok. 3 bad ones out of 4? Urghhhh
blank
dd80forever
15 years ago

Well non i guess that means we shouldn't plan on the playoffs then for what another 3 years? ๐Ÿ˜› I think we can Mike McCarthy after this year and bring in a billacheat assistant and then we bring in there gm and we will be set :)

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



The foremost Billacheat assistant couldn't even get it done at Notre fucking Dame.

Good luck grabbing a GM from an active GM spot at another team too.

I despise the way NE is run, no matter how successful they are... They reward their emerging players by letting them go (A. Samuel), they pay big money for FA's, they suck at drafting. Cheering for NE is like pimping out a leased car.

"dhazer" wrote:



Yet they win games........amazing huh
blank
15 years ago

I expect to win every year with the likes of the Steelers, Pats, and Colts hows that for your answer.

"dhazer" wrote:



NE should be fun to watch in the coming years. They realized they're in a bit of a pickle regarding their future, which was why they stockpiled so many picks this year.
UserPostedImage
15 years ago

Well non i guess that means we shouldn't plan on the playoffs then for what another 3 years? ๐Ÿ˜› I think we can Mike McCarthy after this year and bring in a billacheat assistant and then we bring in there gm and we will be set :)

"dd80forever" wrote:



The foremost Billacheat assistant couldn't even get it done at Notre fucking Dame.

Good luck grabbing a GM from an active GM spot at another team too.

I despise the way NE is run, no matter how successful they are... They reward their emerging players by letting them go (A. Samuel), they pay big money for FA's, they suck at drafting. Cheering for NE is like pimping out a leased car.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



Yet they win games........amazing huh

"dhazer" wrote:



I respect the fact that they win games. I just don't like how they do it, at all. I would feel cheap cheering for them. It's not nearly as much fun as watching a young team develop into perennial winners, like we're going to be able to do, imho.
And like I said, they are already starting to change their philosophy because they're aging and their depth is starting to suffer.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago

Well non i guess that means we shouldn't plan on the playoffs then for what another 3 years? ๐Ÿ˜› I think we can Mike McCarthy after this year and bring in a billacheat assistant and then we bring in there gm and we will be set :)

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



The foremost Billacheat assistant couldn't even get it done at Notre fucking Dame.

Good luck grabbing a GM from an active GM spot at another team too.

I despise the way NE is run, no matter how successful they are... They reward their emerging players by letting them go (A. Samuel), they pay big money for FA's, they suck at drafting. Cheering for NE is like pimping out a leased car.

"dd80forever" wrote:



Yet they win games........amazing huh

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



I respect the fact that they win games. I just don't like how they do it, at all. I would feel cheap cheering for them. It's not nearly as much fun as watching a young team develop into perennial winners, like we're going to be able to do, imho.
And like I said, they are already starting to change their philosophy because they're aging and their depth is starting to suffer.

"dhazer" wrote:



I really don't take issue with the Pats.. their pile of dung coach on the other hand. Classless pile of monkey feces.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

I will make this simple for people to understand. Mike McCarthy in 2007 had a seasoned vet that has seen every possible defense thrown at him so he would do alot of changing the plays at the line. Mike McCarthy stated last year that when Rodgers gets to the line he has a run/pass option on what he reads from the defense. It will be something Rodgers will have to learn to survive. But you people have to understand that. Brett did alot of play calling at the line in 2007 we saw tons of slants and last year we didn't see that many. Also i seen a poster say in the Texan game he didn't have time to throw by the time he got back and turned around the guy was there, in 2007 that play would have been one back step slant pass. So you guys can try and tear this apart all you want but it seems pretty simple to me. Brett made the line look alot better than it actually was, and in time who knows maybe Rodgers can do the same thing.

"dd80forever" wrote:





Perfectly put. It's not a dig on A-Rod but Brett had the experience to make split second decisions AND see things developing before the play started.

It's a 100% completely valid thing. Sure you can look at stats all day long but in the end there is that IT factor that Brett possessed.

"dhazer" wrote:




I know it'll sound crazy, but I totally agree with the both of you, here - I'm probably more optimistic that Rodgers can learn to do things like that (I mean, there aren't a lot of guys who have the kind of experience and dumb luck Favre has always enjoyed, but the kid's only seen a year of live ammo, so to me it's as likely that he will acquire that ability), but otherwise I very much agree. There's no sense in denying that Favre assisted the line play with his savvy.
blank
RaiderPride
15 years ago
IN HIS PRIME... Brett did more than make the line look good. He made everyone look good... Including the Defense that the press would have been focused on for poor play if not for his heroics, and a victory in so many games.

Give Aaron another year or two of game time experience and I expect he will do the same thing.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
DarkaneRules
15 years ago
Hell yeah that is why Favre is a first ballot Hall of Famer. Green Bay lucked out big time. :)

I hope Rodgers has similar success.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Pack93z
15 years ago
Every QB needs to start someplace in the progress to becoming an experienced NFL QB... sooner or later in Green Bay it had to happen.

Considering the track record of QB that followed legends in this league.. I think 08 proved to be highly successful. So why continue to bang on it.. sooner or later someone had to follow Favre.

Both Ted and Mike will have to answer the call if the Packers struggle again this season.. it will be upon Murphy to judge Ted and Ted to judge Mike.

Continuing this Brett saga again this season does nothing to prove it either way. Results this season will.. that there is da' facts.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Merry Christmas!
    beast (12h) : Merry Christmas ๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ
    beast (20h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

    21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23h / Random Babble / beast

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright ยฉ 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comโ„ข. All Rights Reserved.