Zero2Cool
a year ago
Apparently Washington Commanders new owner might be coming up with a new name out of need, not just a want.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
a year ago
Do you have more info on why?
TO me, the name was kind of lame anyway.  Didn't seem like a lot of thought went into it.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago

Do you have more info on why?
TO me, the name was kind of lame anyway.  Didn't seem like a lot of thought went into it.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



It seems like someone started buying up potential names when it was clear Redskins had to change their name. 


https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/05/24/commanders-trademark-application-is-denied/ 
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
a year ago
HAHAHAHAHA.
It's a horrible name.
I prefer to call them the Commodores.  
UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
a year ago
How about "The Washington career Politicians"? Making promises for decades and never coming through.
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago
I read they declined it because someone else had the trademark already (he was trying to guess the name), and because one of the College Military games where Military colleges go against each other is called the Commander.


BUT from something I read, the owner of the trademark claimed he would let the team have it at no cost (which is crazy as it cost him something to get it, at minimum, get reimbursed) but if true, that hurdle can be passed, and it's believed that a rebuttal argument might be able to get past the college game, as one college game per year is not likely to get directly confused with a Professional team. So it's potential to get around these hurdles.


My preferred method would be to rename them as Commanders isn't a great name (and currently it's an insult to real Commanders, at least as long as Snyder is running it) and the more we can erase Snyder from records books the better.

Fans wanted it to be Redwolves. But currently Arkansas State has that trademark, but the Washington team did not even ask if they could work out an arrangement to share it.... they just went that's taken... but really it's probably because Snyder knew what he wanted to name the team the entire time after reports he wanted to name it after the Military (check) and his favorite President (Commander and Chief... check).


But one of the NFL teams should be named after a canine... so many birds and cats, but no canines?

UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
a year ago
How about the tomahawks, destroyers, or swamp creatures?
Go Packers!!!!
beast
a year ago
With Magic Johnson on board, they could call it the

​​​​Washington Lakers

Yeah horrible name, but anyways, sounds like considering to rebrand is in their future discussions, not to do it, but to discuss possibly doing it.

They should either do Washington Redwolves or Wolves/Wolfpack or something that hasn't been discussed at all yet.

Like Washington Wolverines (though Wolverines were never in the DC area).

Probably bad, but Washington Woodpeckers 

Washington Cherry Blossoms? (Probably better for a Female Team)


UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage


UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage
 
UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
a year ago

With Magic Johnson on board, they could call it the

​​​​Washington Lakers

Yeah horrible name, but anyways, sounds like considering to rebrand is in their future discussions, not to do it, but to discuss possibly doing it.

They should either do Washington Redwolves or Wolves/Wolfpack or something that hasn't been discussed at all yet.

Like Washington Wolverines (though Wolverines were never in the DC area).

Probably bad, but Washington Woodpeckers 

Washington Cherry Blossoms? (Probably better for a Female Team)


UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage


UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage
 

Originally Posted by: beast 



I'm inclined to go with just Wolves since it rolls off the tongue better. Plus the team colors are red (or a shade of it anyway) so adding red to the name seems redundant. Is the name Hogs available? I feel like that would be a good one for them since it would tie back in to team history and fits the bill of an animal. Warthogs might fit better with the alliterative sound.  
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
dhazer
a year ago
Hey heres an idea and get off the woke agenda and go back to celebrating the Redskins
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
reed
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (4h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (5h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (5h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (5h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (6h) : Who? What?
beast (15h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (19h) : meh
Zero2Cool (23h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (23h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (23h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.