beast
a year ago

I can't stress this enough, not being a dick, but how the hell do you know this? lol I feel numbers should be so freaking easy, but each time I think 'EUREKA' it turns out I'm a confused as a three dollar bill!

I appreciate your patience and effort on this btw.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

That's like asking me how I know NFL rules. I watch the game, and learn the rules and research stuff when it doesn't make sense to me. It probably also helps that I work in accounting. Like how do you know how to set up and develop a website? Oh, you work.in tech.

The cap is simply an accounting system set up by the NFL to spread signing bonuses equally over the first 5 year of contract signed. (Or less if the contract is less than 5 years).

If a players is released or traded, then 100% of the unaccounted for signing bonus (that was spread into future years) must be fully accounted for in the next following year.

With the exception if they use a post June destination when cutting said players (teams get two post June destination per year) or if the team actually waits until post June, then it must be fully accounted for in the next two years.

The NFL accounting is a hell lot simpler than GAAP accounting.


The really hard part is when media and fans start talking about Dead cap and Cap Hits, because it involves money that's already been paid out in years past but has not been accounted for. 

People  understand paid money that's been accounted for and unpaid money that has not been accounted for... as that's basically cash basis which is simply dealing with cash money.

It the accrual basis that confuses the hell out of people, which is simply money that was paid out at a previous time, but they have not yet accounted for it being paid out.


I remember on here, Julius Peppers had a cap hit for like $15 million, and people were demanding he take a reduction. One person said he needed to come down to $12 million for this year.

But here the thing, he's contract call for only $12 millions in new money for that year, with accounting for an additional $3 million in dead money which he was already paid and was basically his first year pay.

So for long term contracts, the first year pay is usually mostly wrapped up in signing bonus, which is the spread equally over the first 5 years of however long the contract is, which is why the deals are backloaded and you don't need as much money for the first year of an extension.
​​​​​​
 
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago

That's like asking me how I know NFL rules. I watch the game, and learn the rules and research stuff when it doesn't make sense to me. It probably also helps that I work in accounting. Like how do you know how to set up and develop a website? Oh, you work.in tech.​ 

Originally Posted by: beast 



The rules are in a book that can be read, so that's how I'd guess you knew the rules. I know a lot of people who watch football and have zero clue about the rules. As for how do I know how to setup a website? I was doing it for fun far before professionally and the how is trial and error and reading. 

So, I really am not sure I understand how you know how the contract is going to work without seeing the contract itself. That is what confuses me most about these websites that have the contract numbers. They have a general principle to them -- I assume. You mentioned dead cap, cap hit, and all that. That's where the confusion is with me as well. I see many outlets saying X and then Y for the same exact thing. It's like they see a car and they call it a Pinto, and then someone else confidently calls it an Escort. And if you don't know the difference, you're just left thinking it's a tiny car. Granted, most probably couldn't give a damn. 

I've been reading things here and there, and I still think it's better to trade Aaron Rodgers post-June 1st.  If it's about paying this year vs next year, I'd rather post June. The numbers just look better for Packers. Couldn't they use that freed up cap space for signing bonus on the guys I mentioned before? Then again, our 2024 roster doesn't have too many players signed so maybe the pay me now approach is better than pay me later.

All in all here, I am glad I don't gotta do this crap for a living. The NFL makes things too complicated.
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago


I've been reading things here and there, and I still think it's better to trade Aaron Rodgers post-June 1st.  If it's about paying this year vs next year, I'd rather post June. The numbers just look better for Packers. Couldn't they use that freed up cap space for signing bonus on the guys I mentioned before? Then again, our 2024 roster doesn't have too many players signed so maybe the pay me now approach is better than pay me later.

All in all here, I am glad I don't gotta do this crap for a living. The NFL makes things too complicated.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

You're confusing cash vs accounting again.

Signing guys to extensions with signing bonus will cost the Packers a lot of cash but it'll actually free up accounting because the signing bonuses get spread over the first 5 years of the contract.

So no, we don't need more cap space for extensions, as the extensions themselves will free up the cap space (but get rid of cash).


Also, have you considered this, if you wait to June to trade Rodgers, that means the Packers don't get a single draft pick for Rodgers in 2023, because the draft happens before June.

The only reasons to wait post June are1) Too piss off the Jets and Rodgers and demand more.
2) Sign FAs in 2023
3) Sign 2023 draft picks (looks like they're going to cost about $11 million)


But considering the Packers don't seem to even be attempting to do #2... and they already have the cap space for #3 .... the question becomes is #1 worth it enough to miss out of additional 2023 draft picks?

And that depends on what the Jets are offering and if you truly believe you can squeeze out more from them.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago

You're confusing cash vs accounting again.

Originally Posted by: beast 


My friend, I assure you, there are much more things that I an confusing that just those two! I did however hear someone say the Post June 1 trade means Packers hit $15  million on 2023 and $24 million on 2024 which is what I think you were trying to get through my dumb skull. 

So, with that understood (cross fingers), I would suspect the Packers complete the trade in the month of MAY. Why you ask? My golly gosh I am so tickled you asked! I think the Packers want 2024 draft capital more than they want 2023 draft capital as they presumably know they will not get 13th overall. My reasoning is simple. Salary Cap space. I don't think they're tanking in 2023, however, I do feel they know they're gonna need a year of "meh" and not swing for the fences. And two 1st round draft picks? I mean ... money money money.


I'd like to bounce something else into this thread. Do you think it irks Aaron Rodgers that the Jets felt the likes of Chad Pennington, Mark Sanchez, Sam Darnold and 
Zach Wilson were all worth 1st round pick, but he isn't? I mean, assuming Packers want a first round and assuming Jets are refusing -- of course.  Do you also think Rodgers wants to be traded for a higher pick than Brett Favre was? I know it sounds trivial and stupid, but athletes are competitive as heck. And we all know Rodgers can hold a grudge. 

Something else flew between my ears. What if the trade compensation is completed/agreed but the hang up is the "adjustment" to Aaron Rodgers contract? Rodgers chose his words carefully when he told Pat McAfee that his decision to play was not what was hanging things up. I would have to listen to it again, but I believe he was focusing his words about him not being the issue pertaining to his desire to play/not play. Either way, it makes me curious.
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago


So, with that understood (cross fingers), I would suspect the Packers complete the trade in the month of MAY. Why you ask? My golly gosh I am so tickled you asked! I think the Packers want 2024 draft capital more than they want 2023 draft capital as they presumably know they will not get 13th overall. My reasoning is simple. Salary Cap space. I don't think they're tanking in 2023, however, I do feel they know they're gonna need a year of "meh" and not swing for the fences. And two 1st round draft picks? I mean ... money money money.


I'd like to bounce something else into this thread. Do you think it irks Aaron Rodgers that the Jets felt the likes of Chad Pennington, Mark Sanchez, Sam Darnold and Zach Wilson were all worth 1st round pick, but he isn't? I mean, assuming Packers want a first round and assuming Jets are refusing -- of course.  

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


That's assuming they can get better value from the Jets in 2024, which might be correct, but I'm not sure it is, and expect the Jets are refusing to give up a 1st in any year for a player that was 90% going to retire a month ago.

And I think Rodgers understands a team wanting to pay as little as possible. Fun fact: Jets are one of the few teams that did not pass on drafting him in 2005, of course they did draft a Kicker in round 2 ahead of Nick Collins and many others, so yeah.

I think the Packers are rebuilding (at least for a year), or reloading if you prefer, but I think they'd want those picks now as rookies often take at least a year to gel and this way they'll be ready to go next year.


Also, I'm wild guessing here, but I think the Packers are going to be drafting offense because both we need offensive players and to try to make Love look more successful.

  ​​​​​
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago
Nice nugget on Jets not skipping him in 2005, but I don't think Rodgers would have made it to 26 anyway so doubt that factors into anything. 

I think the Packers are rebuilding (at least for a year), or reloading if you prefer, but I think they'd want those picks now as rookies often take at least a year to gel and this way they'll be ready to go next year.

Also, I'm wild guessing here, but I think the Packers are going to be drafting offense because both we need offensive players and to try to make Love look more successful. ​​​​​

Originally Posted by: beast 

Yes, I've said that a few times that I think the Packers are knowingly taking their medicine in 2023.

As for wanting Jordan Love to be successful, I think this is a BS thing to say. The Packers couldn't care less how Love looks. They want to be successful, period. And the QB is a major part of that. The way that comment comes off is they'll sacrifice the team in favor of how Love looks. It's quite simple here. The Packers had elite QB so they felt they could get Tier 2 offensive talent and their elite QB would elevate that talent. Now they have a Tier 2 (optimistically speaking) so they will likely need to add more Tier 1 talent around him. 
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
a year ago

DID GUTE JUST BLINK?

Packers GM Brian Gutekunst just spoke at the NFL owners meetings in Phoenix…
Here’s a recap of what he had to say (per Tom Pelissero) 
⬇️
-There’s no timeline on trading QB Aaron Rodgers, hoping for soon 
-The Packers don’t necessarily need a first round pick in return from the Jets 
-Any chance Rodgers plays for GB again? It’s not trending that way, but “all options are on the table”
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Zero2Cool
a year ago

DID GUTE JUST BLINK?

Packers GM Brian Gutekunst just spoke at the NFL owners meetings in Phoenix…
Here’s a recap of what he had to say (per Tom Pelissero) 
⬇️
-There’s no timeline on trading QB Aaron Rodgers, hoping for soon 
-The Packers don’t necessarily need a first round pick in return from the Jets 
-Any chance Rodgers plays for GB again? It’s not trending that way, but “all options are on the table”

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 


Nicely laid out! I still hate this editor though.

You can only assume someone blinked if you believe the rumors. This is why rumors and hyperbole are stupid as hell. It sets expectations based on false narratives. Be careful what you believe!
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago
I think some of us already picked up on, unlikely to be a guaranteed 1st round pick. But question still is what's the overall comp amount.


Also, there better be something in there, where if the Jets win a Super Bowl with Rodgers in the next two years, then we do get a 2025 1st round pick, and I would try to also if he wins an MVP in there as well, to lower the bar a bit.


But there still be a bit difference if we're talking about multiple 2nds or just a single 3rd type compensation.

Being biased I'm hoping for multiple 2nds being the base guarantee and conditional picks on top of that.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago

I think some of us already picked up on, unlikely to be a guaranteed 1st round pick. But question still is what's the overall comp amount.

Also, there better be something in there, where if the Jets win a Super Bowl with Rodgers in the next two years, then we do get a 2025 1st round pick, and I would try to also if he wins an MVP in there as well, to lower the bar a bit.

But there still be a bit difference if we're talking about multiple 2nds or just a single 3rd type compensation.

Being biased I'm hoping for multiple 2nds being the base guarantee and conditional picks on top of that.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I've been hoping for 2023 first round, 2024 first round and 2025 first round. My expectations are much different and they're more around the Favre compensation. If Packers get more than that, yeehaw, if they get less than that, meh, I'll still destroy everyone in Madden either way.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (5h) : NFL told Bears that Packers’ blocked field goal was legal
packerfanoutwest (22h) : 49ers are underdogs at Packers, ending streak of 36 straight games as favorites
Zero2Cool (22-Nov) : 49ers might be down their QB, DL, TE and LT?
packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : Jaire Alexander says he has a torn PCL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : Even with the context it's ... what?
Mucky Tundra (20-Nov) : Matt LaFleur without context: “I don’t wanna pat you on the butt and you poop in my hand.”
beast (20-Nov) : We brought in a former Packers OL coach to help evaluate OL as a scout
beast (20-Nov) : Jets have been pretty good at picking DL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He landed good players thanks to high draft slot. He isn't good.
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He can shove his knowledge up his ass. He knows nothing.
beast (20-Nov) : More knowledge, just like bring in the Jets head coach
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : What? Why? Huh?
beast (19-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers might to try to bring Douglas in through Milt Hendrickson/Ravens connections
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : The Jets fired Joe Douglas, per sources
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Jets are a mess......
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Pretty sure Jets fired their scouting staff and just pluck former Packers.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Jets sign Anders Carlson to their 53.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : When you cycle the weeks, the total over remains for season. But you get your W/L for that selected week. Confusing.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the totals are accurate..nrvrtmind
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : I don't follow what you are saying. The totals are not the same as last week.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : ok so then wht are the totals the same as last week?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : NFL Pick'em is auto updated when NFL Scores tab is clicked
Martha Careful (19-Nov) : The offense was OK. Let's not forget the Bear defense is very very good.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Who updates the leaderboard on NFLPickem?
beast (19-Nov) : Has the Packers offense been worse since the former Jets coach joined the Packers?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Offense gets his ass in gear, this could be good.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Backup QB helped with three wins. Special Teams contributed to three wins.
bboystyle (18-Nov) : Lions played outside thats why. They scored 16 and 17 in the only 2 outside games this year
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : The rest of the NFL is catching up to Packers ... kicking is an issue throughout league
packerfanoutwest (18-Nov) : Packers DL Kenny Clark: We knew 'we were going to block' Bears' game-winning field goal attempt
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Lions seem to be throttling everyone, but only (only) got 24 lol maybe the rain is why
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Packers vs Lions game doesn't seem so bad.
beast (18-Nov) : Dennis Green "They are what we thought they were, and we let them off the hook!"
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : comment of the day Z2Cool "Bears better than we want to admit. Packers worse than we think. It's facts."
Mucky Tundra (17-Nov) : my worst case scenario: Bears fix their oline and get a coach like Johnson from the Lions and his scheme
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Bears get OL fixed amd we might have a problem
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Pretty sure they already have scouting reports on guys who aren't even starting for their college team. The future is now for me.
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : I tend to let Gute and Co. Worry about the future.
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Jaire and Evans Williams are both ACTIVE! Good news.
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : The badgers really need to change the whole offensive scheme. No draws no screens plus the quarterback is marginal
Cheesey (17-Nov) : If the Badgers had a decent QB, they would have won. The guy can't hit a wide open receiver
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : chop block
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : there was a very questionable job Block call that upon viewing replay was very borderline
beast (17-Nov) : How so? (I didn't watch)
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Badgers got hosed vs Oregon
packerfanoutwest (16-Nov) : damn,he hasn't played since week 2
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
13m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.