2 years ago
Just asking...contractually, what happens if he sits? Do the Packers retain his rights, and if so for how long? Does he face the same situation in a year?
Go Packers!!!!
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

Just asking...contractually, what happens if he sits? Do the Packers retain his rights, and if so for how long? Does he face the same situation in a year?

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



You can think of something like Leveon Bell. Sit out the whole season and then Packers can franchise him again. Adams can sit out until like Week X (not sure when) and get the season counted as one accrued and pocket some nice cash for about half the season. I think Packers can tag him again, but that's it. I think only to franchise tags back to back.
UserPostedImage
porky88
2 years ago
Why are people caught off guard with this? Most players don't want to play on the franchise tag. Look at what happened to Javon Walker. Now, granted he wasn't on the franchise tag, but he blew out his ACL and was never the same player. If Adams tears his ACL next season, then odds are strong he'll lose tens of millions of dollars. Yes, he's slated to get 20 million this season. However, he would garner $50 million guaranteed in bonuses on a long-term deal. This is a business decision for him as much as it is for the Packers.

Additionally, if the Packers do intend to move forward with Aaron Rodgers for the next 2 to 4 seasons, then locking up Adams on a third contract makes sense. Something along the lines of a 4 year extension would likely lower his cap hit for this year and reward him for being the greatest Packers WR since arguably Sterling Sharpe. He has shown little signs of slowing down and been an immensely healthy WR. I suspect he'll remain a the top of his game for at least 2 to 3 more years.

I believe Gutey mentioned in a press conference that they see the franchise tag as a bridge to get from Point A to Point B.

Point B is clearly a long-term contract extension agreement. I would be surprised if one doesn't happen between now and July.
Cheesey
2 years ago

Thankfully, he hasn't spoken like that at all. There have been some athletes who are like "I'm not holding out to hurt the team, you have to understand I have a family to support!" and I'm thinking, yeah, and $14 million isn't enough?

Anyhow, Davante Adams only issue is he wants to be the highest paid WR for his ego. He feels that's what he deserve because he feels there is no WR better than them and he wants to be paid accordingly. That's all it is. It's not about not having a enough money, it's not about the money, it's about the recognition that comes WITH the money. If that makes sense. I probably worded it crappy.

Basically, if the highest paid WR was getting $5 million a year, he'd be good with being paid $5.5 million per year. He just wants to be #1 paid WR.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Geez....but how much is enough? Ego? 20 million should be enough to "prove" his greatness. It's not like it's peanuts. More in one year then most likely everyone on this site would make in a lifetime of hard work.
Greed is destroying all major sports
Now........GET OFF MY LAWN!!!!
šŸ¤ŖšŸ˜
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
2 years ago

Why are people caught off guard with this? Most players don't want to play on the franchise tag. Look at what happened to Javon Walker. Now, granted he wasn't on the franchise tag, but he blew out his ACL and was never the same player. If Adams tears his ACL next season, then odds are strong he'll lose tens of millions of dollars. Yes, he's slated to get 20 million this season. However, he would garner $50 million guaranteed in bonuses on a long-term deal. This is a business decision for him as much as it is for the Packers.

Additionally, if the Packers do intend to move forward with Aaron Rodgers for the next 2 to 4 seasons, then locking up Adams on a third contract makes sense. Something along the lines of a 4 year extension would likely lower his cap hit for this year and reward him for being the greatest Packers WR since arguably Sterling Sharpe. He has shown little signs of slowing down and been an immensely healthy WR. I suspect he'll remain a the top of his game for at least 2 to 3 more years.

I believe Gutey mentioned in a press conference that they see the franchise tag as a bridge to get from Point A to Point B.

Point B is clearly a long-term contract extension agreement. I would be surprised if one doesn't happen between now and July.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



Overall I agree with Porky. This is his last chance to cash it. He has done the work and has earned the right to be the highest paid WR. It will only be for one season. Maybe not the whole year. Someone will come along and pass him up.

I have no doubt the Packers will work it out with him after they create enough cap space.

The issue is what constitutes the highest paid player. Tae and his agent feel they need to look at what DeAndre Hopkins' AAV at $27.250 million as the benchmark. The Packers counter that that was a two season extension to an existing contract so the money was spread out and watered down. They feel Amari Cooper's cap hit of $22 million is a better indicator of a player's salary. Look at the whole thing and not just a slice of it.

Those were the 2021 numbers when negotiations began. Now for 2022, Hopkins' cap hit has increased to $25 + million. In a way by dragging his feet Adams has won part of the battle. The Packers can talk about $23 or $24 million being the benchmark. They have to push it to $26. And as long as you are there, why not go all the way to $27.5 or $28? I don't blame Adams for trying to get all he can. Once he is done, he is done. It's over.

Yes he can sit out for the year. They will do it all again next year but the numbers will be higher. Tae will be a year older and he will be more likely not to live up to the full potential of the contract. Both sides lose.

Last season I thought $25 million was fair. Every time a WR signs for more than that, it will push it further down the list.

UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago
WR are seriously getting overpaid, and I doubt nessarily mean the top WRs, but some #2 or #3 WRs are getting paid better than some #1s...

Which is also why we're seeing a number of WRs released from their contracts before they finish them..

So we might as well give Adams his $28 million or whatever it is, as a long term deal, as soon WRs will be getting over $30 million... it's coming soon.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

Geez....but how much is enough? Ego? 20 million should be enough to "prove" his greatness. It's not like it's peanuts. More in one year then most likely everyone on this site would make in a lifetime of hard work.
Greed is destroying all major sports
Now........GET OFF MY LAWN!!!!
šŸ¤ŖšŸ˜

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Hey, I think it's kind of bogus we even are told their salaries. I think that creates so many headaches and issues. We have zero business knowing their earnings. All it does is create division and angst.

And you already know how much is enough. I just laid it all out for you. He wants to be the highest paid WR, whatever that takes, that is how much is enough. šŸ˜€

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

WR are seriously getting overpaid, and I doubt nessarily mean the top WRs, but some #2 or #3 WRs are getting paid better than some #1s...

Which is also why we're seeing a number of WRs released from their contracts before they finish them..

So we might as well give Adams his $28 million or whatever it is, as a long term deal, as soon WRs will be getting over $30 million... it's coming soon.

Originally Posted by: beast 



No, absolutely not. No WR is worth $28 million a year. I like Adams, but he's 29 years old and has had some concussions. You don't drop that kind of money on a WR if you want to win a Super Bowl.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
2 years ago

Hey, I think it's kind of bogus we even are told their salaries. I think that creates so many headaches and issues. We have zero business knowing their earnings. All it does is create division and angst.

And you already know how much is enough. I just laid it all out for you. He wants to be the highest paid WR, whatever that takes, that is how much is enough. šŸ˜€

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



It has always been this way. People questioned Babe Ruth for making more money that the President. His reply was that he had a better year than the President.

In January 1958 Stan Musial wanted to be the highest paid player in the National League. He got a contract to be the first to receive $100,000. This was after he won the batting title in 1957. All contracts were for 1 year. A few years later after struggling he had to accept a pay cut.

There is so much money in sports these days it's hard for the average person to comprehend. (Can anyone say they really know what a trillion dollars is? It's just a number that we toss around. As an example it would take 1 billion $1000 bills to make a trillion. It really has no meaning.)

The same for players salaries. $20 million a year is obscene. $30 million even more so. There is that much money in the system. Only a fraction of it comes from the fans in the form of ticket prices. Jersey or other memorabilia. Over the years I have been a strong advocate for ownership in all sports. The system is broke. Even if Adams agreed to "only" $10 million a year it would not change the runaway prices.


UserPostedImage
2 years ago
So Adams says he won't play on the franchise tag? Name one WR/TE that did better after leaving Rodgers...Jennings? Jones? Cobb?
Nelson had an ok year with the Raiders, but nothing spectacular. Without #12 tossin him the ball, he will look very pedestrian.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (9h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (9h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (13h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (13h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (13h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (15h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (15h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (15h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (15h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (16h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (16h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (16h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (16h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (17h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (17h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (17h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (17h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (18h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (18h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (18h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (18h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (19h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (19h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (19h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (21h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (21h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (22h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (22h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (22h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (22h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (22h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (22h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (22h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (22h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (22h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (22h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (22h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (22h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (22h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (22h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (22h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (22h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
31m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.