Zero2Cool
3 years ago

I still think Savages best role might be the nickel role, as he seems much better in man coverage or directly following someone, then reading the field predicting where the ball might go.

But the Packers Safety depth sucks, so they can't move Savage out of the Safety role.

As a surprise pick, I'm thinking the Packers might be interesting in the Safety from Michigan with a high pick, as he is a very athletic Safety with nice upside just like Savage was. Though Savage might have a larger build body. But we need a decent third safety, both because 3rd Safeties often get on the field and because it allows us to move Savage and Amos to the nickel and dime positions if we feel like that would be more helpful.


Of course, Packers entire defense needs more depth, except maybe OLB, but if we release some guys (Smiths) then we might need it too.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I was thinking the OLB is the area the defense needs most attention to. We only have Rashan Gary. Preston Smith doesn't play lights out back-to-back seasons, and ZaDarius Smith cannot be brought back on his salary. Whitney Mercilus might re-sign with a friendly deal, but I think we need at least three or four guys there. Even if they are four average guys, you can cycle them in/out to keep them fresh and often times that.

I'm not sure what to make about Darnell Savage. I really thought he would turn into something in year three or four like Gary. Hindsight genius in my says maybe Marquise Brown should have been the pick. Or keep the two fourths and take Deebo at 30th. Okay, I'm done now.
UserPostedImage
beast
3 years ago

I was thinking the OLB is the area the defense needs most attention to. We only have Rashan Gary. Preston Smith doesn't play lights out back-to-back seasons, and ZaDarius Smith cannot be brought back on his salary. Whitney Mercilus might re-sign with a friendly deal, but I think we need at least three or four guys there. Even if they are four average guys, you can cycle them in/out to keep them fresh and often times that.

I'm not sure what to make about Darnell Savage. I really thought he would turn into something in year three or four like Gary. Hindsight genius in my says maybe Marquise Brown should have been the pick. Or keep the two fourths and take Deebo at 30th. Okay, I'm done now.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yeah, I saw that Deebo possiblity this year as well... too bad we didn't have an Adams and Deebo connection.

As for OLBer, it depends on what we're doing there... I wrote that statement based on the contracts we got, and Gary and the Smith brothers would be decent, also the Packers put a ton of OLBers on the IR.

Like we could be getting Ramsey back, whom was our #4 OLB before getting injured in training camp. While he's not a star, he's solid as a #4 guy, better than Garvin, whom we had start at times due to so many injuries.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
3 years ago
No move on Davante as yet.




“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nerdmann
3 years ago
Extending Preston , good sign.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
3 years ago
Amos - I think he is very solid

Turner - This is really a tough one - a good guy, versatile, but a jack of all trades and master of none. Would the money be better spent on a solid but unspectacular RT, like Villanueva

Lowry - agree with go.pack.go on this one...solid but inconsistent. If AR12 is back, you might get a Akeem Hicks or Fletcher Cox at an incentive laden low price

Cobb - Love 'em, but I just don't see it unless he really plays for the minimum with incentives. Availability is suspect.
Go Packers!!!!
nerdmann
3 years ago
Fuck this shit.

 FB_IMG_1646706262075.jpg You have insufficient rights to see the content.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Cheesey
3 years ago

Fuck this shit.

 FB_IMG_1646706262075.jpg You have insufficient rights to see the content.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


Where is there any proof of this?
UserPostedImage
earthquake
3 years ago
Douglas played his way to a mid-level contract as a starting CB, probably something like $7m a year. If the Packers had any cap space whatsoever they would sign him. But they don't, so they probably won't, unless he's overvaluing his market by a significant factor or something like that.

Honestly, if he does sign a contract that the Packers can't match, good for him. He played well beyond expectations, revived his career, and deserves it.
blank
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
3 years ago

Douglas played his way to a mid-level contract as a starting CB, probably something like $7m a year. If the Packers had any cap space whatsoever they would sign him. But they don't, so they probably won't, unless he's overvaluing his market by a significant factor or something like that.

Honestly, if he does sign a contract that the Packers can't match, good for him. He played well beyond expectations, revived his career, and deserves it.

Originally Posted by: earthquake 



Out of 31 other teams, somebody will pay him for his 3/4 of a season. Good for him.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
3 years ago

Douglas played his way to a mid-level contract as a starting CB, probably something like $7m a year. If the Packers had any cap space whatsoever they would sign him. But they don't, so they probably won't, unless he's overvaluing his market by a significant factor or something like that.

Honestly, if he does sign a contract that the Packers can't match, good for him. He played well beyond expectations, revived his career, and deserves it.

Originally Posted by: earthquake 



Rasul Douglas and DeVondre Campbell. Neither showed anything during their career and they have one good season with the Green Bay Packers. If teams are going to break the bank for either of them, good riddance. Those new teams will regret the massive contracts they offered and the player will be happy as heck to sign. This reminds me of that guy who got $100 million from the Redskins based off like one good season.

I would like both back because obviously the system we used on defense made the most of their talent. I just think other teams breaking the bank for them is a mistake.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (18h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (22h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (22h) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (23h) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (23h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (23h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (23h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (23h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (23h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (23h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (23h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (23h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
33m / Random Babble / dfosterf

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.