I cant help but wonder.....did Hackett lose his ability to lead the Packers this last game, thinking more about where he would be coaching next year?
I think its wrong to allow teams to interview a coach while their team is still playing. It HAS to take their mind off the games.
JMO of course.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

While Hackett was the OC, they were running MLF's game plan. Matt even calls the plays so Hackett, who came up in a different system, was more of the feel good buddy to Aaron than the actual OC like so many others are.

To his credit he now has a few different systems to use as he create's the "Hackett Attack Plan".

Originally Posted by: wpr 

He's gonna let Aaron run the show out there. They are going to face plant.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

I don't know if Hacket likes Love or not, but if he wants him to join him with the Broncos, a trade QB Love for WR Jerry Jeudy would be interesting for both teams, and as long as Love doesn't suck both sides could claim victory as Jeudy had a down year with a sprained ankle and Broncos will still have two WRs and a receiver like receiving TE that they selected in the top 50 picks in recent years.

TE Noah Fant would also be interesting, but I think they would be less likely to trade him, as he's been consistent and he's their star TE.

Originally Posted by: beast 

What are the odds Hackett would trade for Love?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

The odds for Love being traded are probably the same as the odds of Rodgers being traded.

Originally Posted by: beast 

That, I simply DO NOT believe!!!

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 

So? The truth doesn't matter if one believes in it or not...

The decision to trade or not trade one of your QBs is probably equal, no matter which one you look at...

But your right, Rodgers being traded probably has a lesser chance as he could retire, where Love clearly isn't retiring. And LaFleur comments seem to suggest Rodgers and Adams will be back if they want to be.

Originally Posted by: beast