Guys open all day. · PACKERSHOME

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

3 years ago

First video. That play on the last drive where Lazard was wide open, uncovered over the middle.

Guys open all day, not getting the ball.

There's no doubt that ST cost us heavily, but damn dude. Keep talking about how Aaron is "so good." What if Love just executes the system? Hit that open guy.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

3 years ago

First video. That play on the last drive where Lazard was wide open, uncovered over the middle.

Guys open all day, not getting the ball.

There's no doubt that ST cost us heavily, but damn dude. Keep talking about how Aaron is "so good." What if Love just executes the system? Hit that open guy.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Then we wouldn’t have been in the playoffs.

beast
Select Member

3 years ago

There's no doubt that ST cost us heavily, but damn dude. Keep talking about how Aaron is "so good." What if Love just executes the system? Hit that open guy.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I think you play Monday morning QB and wrongly assume it's that easy... lots of QBs would absolutely love to do what you're saying and they absolutely can't...

Just because you can say it, doesn't mean someone can do it. QBs aren't going to see everything, that's just a fact... this isn't video games or field view where you are able to see everything.

And just a QB, just playing within the system probably isn't worthy of holding Rodgers jock strap, much less starting over him.

packerfanoutwest
Member

3 years ago

Good videos..but that guy talked too much......that being said, it almost looks intentional on what #12 did or didn't do

beast
Select Member

3 years ago

Guys open all day

What proof do you have?

The videos?

The video openly stated that these are just a few plays, and that the Packers much bigger problem was that receivers we not getting open...

So your own proof states your conclusion is wrong.

Also some of those plays are 3rd and long, and the checkdown is open... but at least one of those, even if a QB hits it, there is no way the TE is getting a first down. Some others it's doubtful that it will create a 1st down.

But yes, there are at least two plays where Rodgers clearly missed something... but two plays in an entire game is extremely small. I much rather focus on the ST blocking two plays than the two plays Rodgers screwed up.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

3 years ago

Originally Posted by: beast

Yeah, 2 or 3 WRs aren't getting open, unlike the guy who's always uncovered. And yeah, these are just a few examples of what was happening all day.

And happening since 2015.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

3 years ago

Yeah, 2 or 3 WRs aren't getting open, unlike the guy who's always uncovered. And yeah, these are just a few examples of what was happening all day.

And happening since 2015.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

The guy on the video you posted as proof, said the opposite of what you are saying...

yooperfan
Veteran Member

3 years ago

What proof do you have?

The videos?

The video openly stated that these are just a few plays, and that the Packers much bigger problem was that receivers we not getting open...

So your own proof states your conclusion is wrong.

Also some of those plays are 3rd and long, and the checkdown is open... but at least one of those, even if a QB hits it, there is no way the TE is getting a first down. Some others it's doubtful that it will create a 1st down.

But yes, there are at least two plays where Rodgers clearly missed something... but two plays in an entire game is extremely small. I much rather focus and on the ST blocking two plays than the two plays Rodgers screwed up.

Originally Posted by: beast

But those two plays could have produced a win for the Packers!
Unfortunately Rodgers needs a seeing eye dog to play quarterback.
Hit the road Aaron, with your seeing eye dog and your tin cup.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

3 years ago

The guy on the video you posted as proof, said the opposite of what you are saying...

Originally Posted by: beast

He's putting some of the blame on ST. And he's saying you can make an argument that a guy wouldn't have gotten to the markers, etc.

He's also showing videos of guys uncovered, wide open. And saying, these are just a few of the times that happened.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

3 years ago

#10

But those two plays could have produced a win for the Packers!
Unfortunately Rodgers needs a seeing eye dog to play quarterback.
Hit the road Aaron, with your seeing eye dog and your tin cup.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Well you just proved you don't need a brain to make a post online...

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I believe he said this was a minor problem to the larger problem that the Packers WRs weren't getting opening for majority of the game.

I believe your own evidence says the opposite of your false conclusions

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

TheKanataThrilla (42m) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later

buckeyepackfan (43m) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!

buckeyepackfan (45m) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.

buckeyepackfan (51m) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.

packerfanoutwest (51m) : well, he was

TheKanataThrilla (56m) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL

Mucky Tundra (1h) : I think this games over

beast (1h) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs

Mucky Tundra (2h) : This game looks too big for Washington

packerfanoutwest (5h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns

packerfanoutwest (5h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts

packerfanoutwest (5h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,

beast (16h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)

beast (21h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab

Zero2Cool (23h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!

beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22