Guys open all day. · PACKERSHOME

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

First video. That play on the last drive where Lazard was wide open, uncovered over the middle.

Guys open all day, not getting the ball.

There's no doubt that ST cost us heavily, but damn dude. Keep talking about how Aaron is "so good." What if Love just executes the system? Hit that open guy.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

2 years ago

First video. That play on the last drive where Lazard was wide open, uncovered over the middle.

Guys open all day, not getting the ball.

There's no doubt that ST cost us heavily, but damn dude. Keep talking about how Aaron is "so good." What if Love just executes the system? Hit that open guy.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Then we wouldn’t have been in the playoffs.

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

There's no doubt that ST cost us heavily, but damn dude. Keep talking about how Aaron is "so good." What if Love just executes the system? Hit that open guy.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I think you play Monday morning QB and wrongly assume it's that easy... lots of QBs would absolutely love to do what you're saying and they absolutely can't...

Just because you can say it, doesn't mean someone can do it. QBs aren't going to see everything, that's just a fact... this isn't video games or field view where you are able to see everything.

And just a QB, just playing within the system probably isn't worthy of holding Rodgers jock strap, much less starting over him.

packerfanoutwest
Member

2 years ago

Good videos..but that guy talked too much......that being said, it almost looks intentional on what #12 did or didn't do

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

Guys open all day

What proof do you have?

The videos?

The video openly stated that these are just a few plays, and that the Packers much bigger problem was that receivers we not getting open...

So your own proof states your conclusion is wrong.

Also some of those plays are 3rd and long, and the checkdown is open... but at least one of those, even if a QB hits it, there is no way the TE is getting a first down. Some others it's doubtful that it will create a 1st down.

But yes, there are at least two plays where Rodgers clearly missed something... but two plays in an entire game is extremely small. I much rather focus on the ST blocking two plays than the two plays Rodgers screwed up.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

Originally Posted by: beast

Yeah, 2 or 3 WRs aren't getting open, unlike the guy who's always uncovered. And yeah, these are just a few examples of what was happening all day.

And happening since 2015.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

Yeah, 2 or 3 WRs aren't getting open, unlike the guy who's always uncovered. And yeah, these are just a few examples of what was happening all day.

And happening since 2015.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

The guy on the video you posted as proof, said the opposite of what you are saying...

yooperfan
Veteran Member

2 years ago

What proof do you have?

The videos?

The video openly stated that these are just a few plays, and that the Packers much bigger problem was that receivers we not getting open...

So your own proof states your conclusion is wrong.

Also some of those plays are 3rd and long, and the checkdown is open... but at least one of those, even if a QB hits it, there is no way the TE is getting a first down. Some others it's doubtful that it will create a 1st down.

But yes, there are at least two plays where Rodgers clearly missed something... but two plays in an entire game is extremely small. I much rather focus and on the ST blocking two plays than the two plays Rodgers screwed up.

Originally Posted by: beast

But those two plays could have produced a win for the Packers!
Unfortunately Rodgers needs a seeing eye dog to play quarterback.
Hit the road Aaron, with your seeing eye dog and your tin cup.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

The guy on the video you posted as proof, said the opposite of what you are saying...

Originally Posted by: beast

He's putting some of the blame on ST. And he's saying you can make an argument that a guy wouldn't have gotten to the markers, etc.

He's also showing videos of guys uncovered, wide open. And saying, these are just a few of the times that happened.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#10

But those two plays could have produced a win for the Packers!
Unfortunately Rodgers needs a seeing eye dog to play quarterback.
Hit the road Aaron, with your seeing eye dog and your tin cup.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Well you just proved you don't need a brain to make a post online...

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I believe he said this was a minor problem to the larger problem that the Packers WRs weren't getting opening for majority of the game.

I believe your own evidence says the opposite of your false conclusions

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Martha Careful (1h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (11h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (11h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (11h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (11h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (11h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (15h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (15h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (15h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (18h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (18h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (18h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (18h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (18h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (18h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (18h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (18h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (19h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (19h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (19h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (20h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (20h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (20h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (20h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (21h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (21h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (21h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (22h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS