Guys open all day.· Page 2

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

3 years ago

But those two plays could have produced a win for the Packers!
Unfortunately Rodgers needs a seeing eye dog to play quarterback.
Hit the road Aaron, with your seeing eye dog and your tin cup.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Have you watched a Packers game in the last 14 years?

Cheesey
Preferred Member

3 years ago

#12

I see what Yoop is saying.
He’s right that had Rodgers hit even one of those open guys, it might have swung the game our way. It might have made the 49ers defense back off, opening up other plays.
How many games this season have the Packers scored 30 or more points?
It seems when Rodgers gets into the playoffs, he forgets everything that got them to that point, and chokes big time.
To me the turning point in the game was the Lewis fumble. They had the Niners on their heals, and did virtually nothing after that.
50 some yards in the second half? There’s no excuse for that. We were not playing the 1985 Bears defense.
Why didn’t they try a trick play like the Lions did to us, to get something going? Cobb was a QB. Why not toss him the ball and have him throw to someone? I bet he would have seen a wide open receiver.

yooperfan
Veteran Member

3 years ago

#13

Have you watched a Packers game in the last 14 years?

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go.

Yes young fellow, I attended my first Packers game in 1956 at old City Stadium.
I've attended scores of games at both Lambeau Field and County
Stadium in Milwaukee.
I have seen the good and the bad over those 65 years.
How many Packers games have you seen.

yooperfan
Veteran Member

3 years ago

#14

Well you just proved you don't need a brain to make a post online...

I believe he said this was a minor problem to the larger problem that the Packers WRs weren't getting opening for majority of the game.

I believe your own evidence says the opposite of your false conclusions

Originally Posted by: beast

It's clear to me that you aren't very smart.
You can root for Aaron Run at his next stop.
Which will probably result in another play off failure.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

3 years ago

#15

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Okay then you should realize that what you said is completely incorrect.

I see what Yoop is saying.
He’s right that had Rodgers hit even one of those open guys, it might have swung the game our way. It might have made the 49ers defense back off, opening up other plays.
How many games this season have the Packers scored 30 or more points?
It seems when Rodgers gets into the playoffs, he forgets everything that got them to that point, and chokes big time.
To me the turning point in the game was the Lewis fumble. They had the Niners on their heals, and did virtually nothing after that.
50 some yards in the second half? There’s no excuse for that. We were not playing the 1985 Bears defense.
Why didn’t they try a trick play like the Lions did to us, to get something going? Cobb was a QB. Why not toss him the ball and have him throw to someone? I bet he would have seen a wide open receiver.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

Is he used to throwing the ball in single digits? Seriously doubt that would’ve turned out well.

Also we point out all the bad plays he’s got, but never praise the good ones? Seems pretty biased (not directed straight at you Cheesey). He even said it in his post game interview that he missed Lazard on that play.

beast
Select Member

3 years ago

#16

It's clear to me that you aren't very smart.
You can root for Aaron Run at his next stop.
Which will probably result in another play off failure.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Apparently you're the one that needs the seeing eye dog...

I can root for Rodgers as a Packer, and yes 31 teams end in failure every year, that's not a surprise, but some of us are honest, and don't hate and create lies about what actually happened.

yooperfan
Veteran Member

3 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: beast

Now I know how dumb you are!!!

Cheesey
Preferred Member

3 years ago

#18

Gopackgo.....I praise Rodgers when he does good. The whole regular season, in fact the last 3 I praised his regular season play.
But I’m not blind to his constant playoff play. MVP in the regular season, and disappeared in the playoffs.
That seems to me like some kind of mental block. He had multiple chances this last game, and did nothing.

And for all the guys here.....it seems there is a lot of name calling here. Aren’t we all Packer fans? The attacks here make me sad. Just because of differing opinions, that shouldn’t be a reason to call people idiots and be nasty.
I think we all are frustrated by how the Packer season has ended the last several years. I know I’m still not over it (I want the Rams to bury the Niners!!!)
But like Rodney King said, “Can’t we all just get along?”😁

yooperfan
Veteran Member

3 years ago

#19

Sorry Cheesey, but it seems like like some of the kids here are Rodgers fans and not really Packers fans.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

3 years ago

#20

Sorry Cheesey, but it seems like like some of the kids here are Rodgers fans and not really Packers fans.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

What a joke lol

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (1h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (1h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (2h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (2h) : now 3

Zero2Cool (3h) : Who? What?

beast (11h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (16h) : meh

Zero2Cool (20h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (20h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (20h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (23h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (23h) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24