Guys open all day. · PACKERSHOME

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

3 years ago

First video. That play on the last drive where Lazard was wide open, uncovered over the middle.

Guys open all day, not getting the ball.

There's no doubt that ST cost us heavily, but damn dude. Keep talking about how Aaron is "so good." What if Love just executes the system? Hit that open guy.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

3 years ago

First video. That play on the last drive where Lazard was wide open, uncovered over the middle.

Guys open all day, not getting the ball.

There's no doubt that ST cost us heavily, but damn dude. Keep talking about how Aaron is "so good." What if Love just executes the system? Hit that open guy.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Then we wouldn’t have been in the playoffs.

beast
Select Member

3 years ago

There's no doubt that ST cost us heavily, but damn dude. Keep talking about how Aaron is "so good." What if Love just executes the system? Hit that open guy.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I think you play Monday morning QB and wrongly assume it's that easy... lots of QBs would absolutely love to do what you're saying and they absolutely can't...

Just because you can say it, doesn't mean someone can do it. QBs aren't going to see everything, that's just a fact... this isn't video games or field view where you are able to see everything.

And just a QB, just playing within the system probably isn't worthy of holding Rodgers jock strap, much less starting over him.

packerfanoutwest
Member

3 years ago

Good videos..but that guy talked too much......that being said, it almost looks intentional on what #12 did or didn't do

beast
Select Member

3 years ago

Guys open all day

What proof do you have?

The videos?

The video openly stated that these are just a few plays, and that the Packers much bigger problem was that receivers we not getting open...

So your own proof states your conclusion is wrong.

Also some of those plays are 3rd and long, and the checkdown is open... but at least one of those, even if a QB hits it, there is no way the TE is getting a first down. Some others it's doubtful that it will create a 1st down.

But yes, there are at least two plays where Rodgers clearly missed something... but two plays in an entire game is extremely small. I much rather focus on the ST blocking two plays than the two plays Rodgers screwed up.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

3 years ago

Originally Posted by: beast

Yeah, 2 or 3 WRs aren't getting open, unlike the guy who's always uncovered. And yeah, these are just a few examples of what was happening all day.

And happening since 2015.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

3 years ago

Yeah, 2 or 3 WRs aren't getting open, unlike the guy who's always uncovered. And yeah, these are just a few examples of what was happening all day.

And happening since 2015.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

The guy on the video you posted as proof, said the opposite of what you are saying...

yooperfan
Veteran Member

3 years ago

What proof do you have?

The videos?

The video openly stated that these are just a few plays, and that the Packers much bigger problem was that receivers we not getting open...

So your own proof states your conclusion is wrong.

Also some of those plays are 3rd and long, and the checkdown is open... but at least one of those, even if a QB hits it, there is no way the TE is getting a first down. Some others it's doubtful that it will create a 1st down.

But yes, there are at least two plays where Rodgers clearly missed something... but two plays in an entire game is extremely small. I much rather focus and on the ST blocking two plays than the two plays Rodgers screwed up.

Originally Posted by: beast

But those two plays could have produced a win for the Packers!
Unfortunately Rodgers needs a seeing eye dog to play quarterback.
Hit the road Aaron, with your seeing eye dog and your tin cup.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

3 years ago

The guy on the video you posted as proof, said the opposite of what you are saying...

Originally Posted by: beast

He's putting some of the blame on ST. And he's saying you can make an argument that a guy wouldn't have gotten to the markers, etc.

He's also showing videos of guys uncovered, wide open. And saying, these are just a few of the times that happened.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

3 years ago

#10

But those two plays could have produced a win for the Packers!
Unfortunately Rodgers needs a seeing eye dog to play quarterback.
Hit the road Aaron, with your seeing eye dog and your tin cup.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Well you just proved you don't need a brain to make a post online...

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I believe he said this was a minor problem to the larger problem that the Packers WRs weren't getting opening for majority of the game.

I believe your own evidence says the opposite of your false conclusions

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (1h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (1h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (2h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (2h) : now 3

Zero2Cool (3h) : Who? What?

beast (11h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (16h) : meh

Zero2Cool (20h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (20h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (20h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (23h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (23h) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24