nickb364
15 years ago
This to me is a stupid move.

We gave up 3 selections for THIS guy? Really?

This is a guy we could of got at 41 IMO.

I like the Raji selection, but THREE draft choices for a guy who wasn't even looked at as a top 10 pick. I also prefer Everette Brown.. and please don't tell me he's a clone of Jamal Reynolds only because they went to the same school..

Now we won't see ourselves picking until the fourth round.. great.

41,73,83 ... GREAT LINEUP.. GONE

NOT TO MENTION THE PICK WE GOT FOR A HALL OF FAME QUARTERBACK IS GOING TO THE PATRIOTS.

One of the stupidest moves I've ever seen. Sorry!
UserPostedImage
Dulak
15 years ago

This to me is a stupid move.

We gave up 3 selections for THIS guy? Really?

This is a guy we could of got at 41 IMO.

I like the Raji selection, but THREE draft choices for a guy who wasn't even looked at as a top 10 pick. I also prefer Everette Brown.. and please don't tell me he's a clone of Jamal Reynolds only because they went to the same school..

Now we won't see ourselves picking until the fourth round.. great.

41,73,83 ... GREAT LINEUP.. GONE

NOT TO MENTION THE PICK WE GOT FOR A HALL OF FAME QUARTERBACK IS GOING TO THE PATRIOTS.

One of the stupidest moves I've ever seen. Sorry!

"nickb364" wrote:



I'm with Nick - So this guy is worth 2 3rds? and ya we could of gotten him at 41 I bet.

We lost out on some good OTs in the 2nd and 3rd now. IMO Clint sintim would of been much better.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
People are being kind of stupid about this. One of those thirds we got for a QB who freaking retired. It was a free pick. Does that mean its okay to throw it away? No, but some retards are acting like we gave up a shit load to get that second 3rd rounder. We got it for a player who RETIRED!

With that said, I'd rather have had the trade go like this.
1st for our 2nd and highest 3rd.
or
1st, 3rd for our 2nd and both 3rds.


I don't like that we don't have a 2nd or 3rd round pick. Ted usually hits well on those. With this trade I'm thinking we have more going on behind the scenes. There will be more trades.

Also, let's keep this thread about Clay Matthews please.
UserPostedImage
millertime
15 years ago
Here's our chance to see who was left at 41 and later.

41. Darius Butler (CB) UConn
42. Jairus Byrd (CB) Oregon
43. Everette Brown (DE) Florida St
44. Pat White (WR) W Virginia
45. Clint Sintim (OLB) Virginia
46. Connor Barwin (DE) Cincy


Still Available at our positions of need:

Paul Kruger OLB UTAH
Cody Brown OLB UCONN
Tyrone McKenzie OLB S FLORIDA

Connor Barwin DE CINCY
Lawrence Sidbury DE RICHMOND
Michael Johnson DE GA TECH
David Veikune DE HAWAII

William Beatty OT UCONN
Phil Loadholt OT OKLAHOMA
Jamon Meredith OT S CAROLINA

Jarron Gilbert DT SAN JOSE ST
Fili Moala DT USC
Sen'Derrick Marks DT AUBURN



The guys in bold will be the ones that Matthews will probably be compared with in the future because they play the same position and were drafted where the Packers would have been in the second. I liked Everette Brown (high character, high productivity) even at 9 (YIKES!) but like the PACK I worry about his coverage skills. A ot of people hear like Sintim and Barwin so it should be fun to watch how this plays out.
all_about_da_packers
15 years ago

This to me is a stupid move.

We gave up 3 selections for THIS guy? Really?

One of the stupidest moves I've ever seen. Sorry!

"Dulak" wrote:



I'm with Nick - So this guy is worth 2 3rds? and ya we could of gotten him at 41 I bet.

We lost out on some good OTs in the 2nd and 3rd now. IMO Clint sintim would of been much better.

"nickb364" wrote:




Let's contextualize giving up three draft picks.

Colts GM Bill Polian, whose been scouting players for three decades, called this the weakest draft class he has ever seen.

Think about that for a minute. The man whose been doing this for 30+ years said this is the weakest draft class he's ever been a part of.

If I'm not mistaken, Phil Savage was also quoted as saying to Bob McGinn that this class really lacked solid prospects. I'm not sure if Savage said this too, but I remember reading some scout / personnel guy say that the increased number of 3-4 teams were going to cause a run of OLBs that would lead most OLBs to go higher than they deserved to.

Three draft picks are a lot, especially for Ted. But think about what others like Bill Polian have said about the (lack of) depth in this draft class, and realize that Ted making such a move is uncharacteristic as hell.

IMO Ted went and got value where he could.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
DarkaneRules
15 years ago
Agreed they wanted Matthews not Brown or anyone else at that point. This was their guy, so you get him.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago

This to me is a stupid move.

We gave up 3 selections for THIS guy? Really?

One of the stupidest moves I've ever seen. Sorry!

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



I'm with Nick - So this guy is worth 2 3rds? and ya we could of gotten him at 41 I bet.

We lost out on some good OTs in the 2nd and 3rd now. IMO Clint sintim would of been much better.

"Dulak" wrote:




Let's contextualize giving up three draft picks.

Colts GM Bill Polian, whose been scouting players for three decades, called this the weakest draft class he has ever seen.

Think about that for a minute. The man whose been doing this for 30+ years said this is the weakest draft class he's ever been a part of.

If I'm not mistaken, Phil Savage was also quoted as saying to Bob McGinn that this class really lacked solid prospects. I'm not sure if Savage said this too, but I remember reading some scout / personnel guy say that the increased number of 3-4 teams were going to cause a run of OLBs that would lead most OLBs to go higher than they deserved to.

Three draft picks are a lot, especially for Ted. But think about what others like Bill Polian have said about the (lack of) depth in this draft class, and realize that Ted making such a move is uncharacteristic as hell.

IMO Ted went and got value where he could.

"nickb364" wrote:



Interesting comments. I heard someone talking on NFL channel about how little the talent is in the draft. I did not see who was speaking so it could have been Polian. I do not know. His comment was the 1st thing I thought of when Ted made the move up instead of down like he usually does.
The Bears traded their 2nd for a 3rd and 4th. The way I see it is GB traded their 2nd and 3rd for Matthews which would appear to be the going rate. I said a few days ago that I would rather have 1 above average player who makes an impact than 2 or 3 average or roster fillers. I will jsut trust the GB Brass that Clay is since I don't know myself.

Since the "Brett pick" was acquired for a "retired" player it didn't matter to Ted if New England insisted on that pick as well. Getting the 5th in return still gave them something for a man who would never play in GB again.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

I can not imagine that a GM of any professional team would use a # 1 pick based on old family ties of any kind.

I am sure Clay can be a pass rush specialist. I do not know yet if he is an every down NFL type LB.

"wpr" wrote:



Of course it wasn't nepotism or cronyism - those who are inclined to bag on Thompson just have to complain about something. He traded up - he filled a position of need - he did several things today that they deride him for not doing. So what's left to criticize, you ask? They'll find it.

As for the pick, the more I think about it, the more I like it - he looks to be just the kind of versatile guy you want to compliment Kampman, and he's a high motor guy. Obviously they all must like him, and I would imagine they were pretty sure someone else did too and wanted to make sure they got him.

The scouts seem to like the pick, and we did need another OLB - I'm okay with it.
blank
Cheesey
15 years ago
I don't get it........TT gathers up draft picks, people rag on him for gathering up alot of picks.
He gives up some picks (opposite of what he has done in the past) to go after someone he wanted, and people rag on him.

What does all this prove?

Those that hate him, will hate him NO MATTER WHAT HE DOES.

As far as making the leap that he picked Matthews because he's the kid of someone he knows is proof how far some will go in their "conspiracy" theories.
Yeah......makes ALOT of sense, doesn't it? TT: "Hey......I'm gonna give up a bunch of picks cause i know old so-and-so! Who CARES if he will help our team, and help me keep my job!"
Lame.....just plain lame.
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
15 years ago
I find this effing funny..

1st we have people yelling and screaming at Ted and staff for not OVER SPENDING on players in free agency.

Now we have a player that Ted and staff believe is worth the price of draft picks and they "over pay" in draft picks to get him, and now people are pissed at Ted for doing that

Some people are never happy
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
    dfosterf (5h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
    beast (7h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
    Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
    beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
    beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
    wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
    wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
    wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
    beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
    beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
    beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
    beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
    beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
    wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
    beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
    beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
    beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.