You are correct. But then again they didn't stack the box lat week either. I don't remember if they did it the least or not but their defense was at the bottom.
Originally Posted by: wpr
Yes, it's a pick your poison, you can defend against the run (like the Vikings did) and get burned by the pass... or you can defend against the pass (like the Lions did) and get burned by the run. It's possible to defend against both, but you need to have the players talented enough, or you'll get burned by both.
Also so far the Packers have faced DL missing an important starting DL and had a rookie starting at CB starting in their first NFL game.
And Saints are missing their starting DE (which they traded two 1st round pick to the Packers for), he's got a foot injury.
Though their starting DBs are all veterans.
The Saints will be the toughest test for the Packers, as the Saints system will give the defense the best test, and the veteran DBs.
Also they have some former Packers in QB Taysom Hill, TE Jared Cook, and RB Ty Montgomery
Man if TE Cook's agent only didn't overvalue their market, or if the Packers just called their buff and waited for their price to go down, which if you call a buff, you better be willing to go without and they wanted a TE.
Also I still feel like RB Montgomery is the perfect RB/WR for the Packers current system style... too bad we didn't have Montgomery when we were actually using RBs in the passing game.