Just because a player lines up as a FB does not make him a FB. You can put Boyle in the spot where a FB would line up doesn't mean he is.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

When has a QB ever used as FB? Take those occurrences and compare them with the amount of times a TE was used as FB. Do you see how senseless the analogy you made was or do you just refuse to understand that I'm saying we're going to use a TE in the FB position? Should I have put him at TE and put FB in parentheses to indicate that I think he's a TE who's going to be used in the FB position?

The "true" FB the Packers had was officially changed to TE.
 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

*SIGH* Whatever you want Zero.

I said a long time ago that a TE can line up in the FB position. Still doesn't make him a FB. He's still a TE playing another position. If you want to call him a FB, I really don't care. Do it.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

I think the only reason they changed the FB was because they changed the depth chart to get rid of the FB all together.

Delontae Scott is still listed as a DL, even though at 6'5", 246lbs, he's thinner than some SS. I believe Scott is an OLBer with the Packers.

Originally Posted by: beast 

Or maybe they changed him to TE and since they didn't have a FB they removed the position? 😜🤓

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

I call him a TE that plays the FB position. Just as I slotted him in the original post. Still not sure why all the hassle about it.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool