point of this thread was if the Pack got to the NFCCG in 2 years form going 6-10, why cant they get there in 2 years with what seems to be better over all talent?

And your going to take the 05 offense?

LOL

39 Td last year on offense..27 FG made in 08

31 TDs on offense in 05.......20 FG made in 05

"longtimefan" wrote:

good catch...Probably a mistake but also could be the only way his argument could look good

"Stevetarded" wrote:

If anyone is going out of their godforsaken way to make an argument look good it's LT. Let's find the worse record in the last 2 Decades and compare this team to it. Stunning.

The fact is if this team was winning you wouldn't have to dig up, manipulate, and twist the facts to support your feelings. You would know by what matters when all is said and done........Success

Whats so bad about comparing the worst record to the second worst record teams?

I can't read it for you LT

I said with no injuries I'd take the 05 offense. Throwing out stats when we were on a gazillionth string RB and throwing balls to a guy named Taco is really proving some kind of point

Brett, Javon, Donald Driver, Green, Henderson, Franks anyday over A-Rod, Grant, Kuhn, Jennings, Donald Driver and Lee

It's funny how you are getting on DH for selectively picking stats when you compared it to the 05 offense which was decimated beyond belief with injuries.


So go ahead and use 05 as a barometer when half the team was on IR. Funny you didn't choose to use 04 when GB racked up 45 TD's. Thats with the starters on the field

45 TD's > 39 TD'S
10-6 > 6-10
NFC North 1st > NFC North 3rd
Playoffs > No playoffs


If anyone is going out of their godforsaken way to make an argument look good it's LT. Let's find the worse record in the last 2 Decades and compare this team to it. Stunning.

The fact is if this team was winning you wouldn't have to dig up, manipulate, and twist the facts to support your feelings. You would know by what matters when all is said and done........Success

"longtimefan" wrote:

I'm not sure what the point of this thread is but it is eye-opening our Defense gave up more points than the 4-12 unit did last year. I would take our Offense in 05 with Favre, Donald Driver, Javon, Green, Henderson and Franks over what we have now. The O-Line is a wash to me. The only unit I can say was better last year was maybe WR.

If I had to choose overall, and were to include injuries, I'd go with 08. If you took away the injuries of 05' and the injuries of 08' and gave me a choice I'd go with 05'.

"dd80forever" wrote:

I just cant understand how anyone can say its better talent? We have guys that never make the field but yet are getting ranked higher than guys that played in 05. The opinion was the starters in 05 overall were better so people started trying to say we have better depth than back then. But how can you tell because the guys were forced to play back than and we have the potential players on our bench now.

"dhazer" wrote:

I just cant understand how anyone can say its better talent? We have guys that never make the field but yet are getting ranked higher than guys that played in 05. The opinion was the starters in 05 overall were better so people started trying to say we have better depth than back then. But how can you tell because the guys were forced to play back than and we have the potential players on our bench now.

"dhazer" wrote: