dhazer
15 years ago

Signing Crabtree would be a cap nightmare.

Remember Jennings is not signed yet and those two agents would have a field day playing off each other because they both play the same position.

I personally think it would screw up Jennings and he would not re-sign with the Packers.

Crabtree will be special. Greg already is.

"RaiderPride" wrote:



you hit the nail on the head but for the opposite reason RP. If Crabtree is there you can't be that stupid and pass on him. The point you made on Jennings makes this obvious. Jennings is not signed to the extension so you never know he might not be staying with the Packers so you jump right away just to be safe (if drafting the best player in the draft is safe). As far as the cap have you not been paying attention? We have tons of money Ted Thompson don't spend so its not like we would be hurting for cap space.


If we get Crabtree i'll kiss TT's ass.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago

Signing Crabtree would be a cap nightmare.

Remember Jennings is not signed yet and those two agents would have a field day playing off each other because they both play the same position.

I personally think it would screw up Jennings and he would not re-sign with the Packers.

Crabtree will be special. Greg already is.

"dhazer" wrote:



you hit the nail on the head but for the opposite reason RP. If Crabtree is there you can't be that stupid and pass on him. The point you made on Jennings makes this obvious. Jennings is not signed to the extension so you never know he might not be staying with the Packers so you jump right away just to be safe (if drafting the best player in the draft is safe). As far as the cap have you not been paying attention? We have tons of money Ted Thompson don't spend so its not like we would be hurting for cap space.


If we get Crabtree i'll kiss Ted Thompson's ass.

"RaiderPride" wrote:



I wish I were in charge of the GB war room. It would be worth the pick for this alone. It would be worth it if GB had to trade up to get him. :sign5: :sign5: :sign5: :sign5: :sign5: :sign5: :sign5:
UserPostedImage
RaiderPride
15 years ago

If we get Crabtree i'll kiss Ted Thompson's ass.

"dhazer" wrote:



Do we get to pick the place and time....

I say it should be at half time, at center field.... And... I say we wait a few years and have you kiss Ted's ass just before the ceremony when the Packers retire Brett's Jersey.

Serious....

You make a good point Hazer.... Jennings is not signed and it would be a shame to pass on him if Greg has other plans (Which I Doubt though.)
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
warhawk
15 years ago
I would like to see Crabtree still there because it would give us more options. There would certainly be teams looking to trade up with us to get him, or, we can take him.

It looks like there will be some serious talent on the board when we come up so we should end up with a great player there or move back a few spots and end up with 5 picks in the first three rounds.

Either way I think we come out of this draft in a strong position.
"The train is leaving the station."
zombieslayer
15 years ago



So for me, the logical conclusion is either take Crabtree there or sell the pick to the highest / most value bidder on the phone lines.

"pack93z" wrote:



Agreed. I'd take him and see what I could get for him. Or keep him and deal Jordy or Jones.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Dulak
15 years ago
Seems like most of you guys like crabtree - I'm a bit surprised. And even over raji.

I do agree that getting smith (not andre) or monroe would be a gift - and I dont forsee it happening at all.

IMO the most likely people at 9 will be raji, brown, perhaps orakpo (although it seems like his stock is rising compared to brown), crabtree, jenkins, andre smith, perhaps sanchez ...

I personally dont want us to go for crabtree - although it depends whom is left. If raji and orakpo are off the board then ya I wouldnt mind - I just know that we need to make sure jennings gets paid.
Dulak
15 years ago



So for me, the logical conclusion is either take Crabtree there or sell the pick to the highest / most value bidder on the phone lines.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Agreed. I'd take him and see what I could get for him. Or keep him and deal Jordy or Jones.

"pack93z" wrote:



NOOOOO ... dont get rid of jones ... remember him in 07 he had some good plays there
DakotaT
15 years ago



So for me, the logical conclusion is either take Crabtree there or sell the pick to the highest / most value bidder on the phone lines.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Agreed. I'd take him and see what I could get for him. Or keep him and deal Jordy or Jones.

"pack93z" wrote:




How about we just keep them all and have a nightmare for the opposing Defensive Coordinators. When you have talent at the quarterback position, the best thing to do is keep talent around him, and try and keep his jersey clean in the process.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago
So with word leaking that many of the top 10 teams want to slide out of it.. that make the drama even more interesting if Crabtree is there..


Jags Trying Hard To Trade Out Of The Top Ten
Posted by Mike Florio on April 13, 2009, 4:42 p.m.

As the 2009 draft approaches, several teams in the top ten actively are trying to trade out of it.

Were hearing that this group includes the Lions, Chiefs, and Browns.

It also includes the Jaguars, whom were told are desperately trying to get out of the eighth overall spot in the draft.

But the Jags currently can find no takers.

Nor can any of the other teams in the top ten.

As one league source explained it, there are three issues making the top-ten teams want to get out, and keeping other teams from wanting to get in.

First, the money paid at the top of the draft has gotten out of hand. Even hard-core agent types who previously have argued with us about this issue are now admitting that the values of the contracts at the top of the process are too high.

Second, theres no bell cow in the draft no must-have player in the view of one or more teams.

Third, theres no real separation between the top players at each position. For example, Michael Crabtree isnt $20 million better than Hakeem Nicks. But if Crabtree goes within the first seven picks of the round and Nicks goes in the last ten, the dollar value of their respective contracts will entail a gap potentially that large, if not larger.

Ditto for the tackles and the quarterbacks.

So why take a guy at No. 2 when a comparable player can be gotten for much less money at No. 20?

In the end, this years experience could provide just enough ammunition to get a meaningful rookie wage scale implemented as part of the next CBA.

PFTALK" wrote:


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I am going to take a contrarian view and say that I think drafting Crabtree would be a powerful incentive for Jennings to sign an extension. Yes, he is currently The Man in Green Bay, and with Crabtree on the roster, Jennings would have to share catches, but think about the potential of that tandem! Defenses couldn't possibly game plan against both of them at once, particularly with Driver or Nelson in the slot. I have to think that Jennings' statistics would actually improve, if not in number of catches, then certainly in yards. And with opposing defenses having to cover the deep routes, they wouldn't be able to stuff the box, which would open up lanes for our running game.

Even with our defensive implosions, the Packers were in all but two games last season. This team doesn't need much to push it over the top. Why wouldn't Jennings want to stay around for that?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (17m) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (22h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (22h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
47m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.