Poll Question: What word best describes President Obama? Discuss.

Total: 8

Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
I was surfing earlier today and spent time on a blog. (No I don't have the link -- I was surfing. Does the Big Kahuna take notes when he's riding the waves?)

Anyway, the blog in question was a conservative one, and debating the question of whether Obama was evil or just stupid.

I thought it suggested a possible topic for discussion. So since I make no pretense that I think our current Prez is a pinhead, I'm going to use Obama. (Others can feel free to start a similar poll for one of their least favorite politicos...)


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
I'm tempted to say "evil." I do think he's a manipulative sonuvabitch, a conman. And he is an Illinois politician after all.

And I definitely think his "ideas", especially his economic ones, are stupider than stupid. And his famed rhetorical skill is merely an ability to sell items without any real value -- Madison Avenue has thousands of stupid people with that sort of ability.

But I do think he has some "well-meaning" in him, too. So today I'll settle for incompetent. Well-meaning or not, intelligent or not, good man or not, he simply doesn't have what a President ought to have. He doesn't even have the abilities a "liberal" or "Democratic" President ought to have. At best he's a Casper Chocolatemilquetoast. And at worst he's a cross between Merkin Muffley, Ellsworth Toohey, and No. 2.



And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
12 years ago
The guy is the best President since Reagan. The guy can't catch a break because every clown with an internet connection knows everything. Everything done is twisted to a negative or positive depending on their own views.

Problem with this country is no one has respect for anyone anymore. See someone with power? They must be a power tripping ego maniac who's corrupt!! Foolish, pure foolish.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

The guy is the best President since Reagan. The guy can't catch a break because every clown with an internet connection knows everything. Everything done is twisted to a negative or positive depending on their own views.

Problem with this country is no one has respect for anyone anymore. See someone with power? They must be a power tripping ego maniac who's corrupt!! Foolish, pure foolish.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Gee. I think I'm going to have to rethink this Kevin-for-Prez idea.

Obama is merely the most rhetorically savvy president since Reagan.

And like Reagan, he is an expert at saying nothing while appearing to be profound and all the rest.

I admit I voted for Reagan twice. The first time I believed in him as 2008 Obamoids believed in Obama. The second time I was disillusioned, but I also still bought into the "lesser of two evils" philosophy of voting.

But apart from his first tax bill, and his recognition of Cold War realities, he was a mediocre President by historical standards. If Obama is no better than Reagan, he is, IMO, unworthy of the office for a second term.

And if the two parties can't come up with anyone better than mediocre, it's time for 'none of the above.' The country of Washington and Jefferson, Adams and Madison and even Hamilton, deserves better. If we have to settle for mediocre, then we might as well be France.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Since69
12 years ago

Problem with this country is no one has respect for anyone anymore. See someone with power? They must be a power tripping ego maniac who's corrupt!! Foolish, pure foolish.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Says the admin whose self-assigned forum rank is "Legend"...

My personal take on Obama is that he underestimated his own power. I believe he ran for office believing all that fluff he was shoveling, and I believe he thought he could make a difference. The problem is congress. Not just the Republicans. And not just the Democrats. Congress as a whole. The president can't do squat without congress' backing.

And that's how it should be, frankly. The authors of the constitution set strict limits on the president's power because they knew what it was like to live under a tyrant and they didn't want to have to do it again. If we really want change, we have to start with congress. Term limits would be a fine place to start, but the American people really need to get involved and hold their representatives accountable. There's too much lazy, uninformed party-line rubber-stamp voting going on in this country. And as a result, congress is infested with bloated, self-important, squabbling children who would rather make the other side of the aisle look bad than cooperate and get things done, while still managing to get reelected term after term.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
12 years ago
Unlike most people, I don't really buy into the "politicians are evil" thing. I'd definitely say that many are corrupt or straight-up out of touch with reality, but this isn't the movies, kids. There's a difference between out of touch and straight-up being a self-serving asshole that doesn't care what happens to anyone else. Not many people do things just to be a dick. I think Obama is well-meaning, and like any other politician he's prone to bouts of half-truths and distortions to combat the crap coming at him from the other side of the aisle not out of some supervillian need to be evil, but for self-preservation and in his eyes to combat people that are taking the country in the wrong direction. I'm not going to get into specific policy decisions since that horse has long since been beaten to a bloody pulp, but the presidency is one of the worst jobs in the world. We can't expect our politicians to be perfect, and I refuse to listen to the "Obama's trying to destroy the country/turn us into a socialist utopia!" crap any more than I put up with the constant "Bush planned 9/11 for oil and personal profit/herp derp Bush is dumb let's interpret and distort everything in a way that justifies our view" crap that went on during his terms.

People are judgmental, illogical assholes (typically with good intentions) to some extent whether they like to admit it or not, myself included. We're all too eager to scream and cry about someone we don't agree with doing X until someone we do like does something equivalent to X.
Zero2Cool
12 years ago
I was talking out of my ass about Reagan and his presidency, I don't know good from bad because I don't have any facts to support anything positive or negative about any of the past presidents.

I admit I voted for Reagan twice. The first time I believed in him as 2008 Obamoids believed in Obama. The second time I was disillusioned, but I also still bought into the "lesser of two evils" philosophy of voting.

Originally Posted by: Wade 


The lesser of two evils is what we're left with because of the direction of campaigns. I hate, absolutely HATE campaigns because everything is Candidate A downgrading Candidate B and vice versa. It's not a I'm going to tell the nation how I'm the best candidate, nope, its I'm gonna tell them how the other candidate is wrong for the nation. It might not sound like a difference, but to me it's huge. I want someone who doesn't have to knock someone down to appear better. I want someone who is going to say I will do this, this is where we need to go, this is where we need to be and I am the person to get us there!

We raise our children to treat others with respect and if nothing good to say, speak nothing at all. Yet when it comes to running for the most powerful position in the world, its no holds barred?


Says the admin whose self-assigned forum rank is "Legend"...

Originally Posted by: Since69 


And proving my statement that everyone with an internet connection feels they know everything without research. It's a rank and it's based off post count. Thanks for trying! 😣
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (13m) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (13m) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (13m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (21m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (22m) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (42m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
    beast (3h) : Packers will get in
    beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
    Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
    Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
    Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
    Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
    buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
    Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
    beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
    bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
    buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
    Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.